B 型主动脉夹层患者胸腔内血管主动脉修复术后胸腔主动脉生长的预测因素。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/17085381241273233
Yonghui Chen, Jianli Ren, Zongwei Liu, Dongsheng Cui, Shuaishuai Wang, Jiaxue Bi, Xiangchen Dai
{"title":"B 型主动脉夹层患者胸腔内血管主动脉修复术后胸腔主动脉生长的预测因素。","authors":"Yonghui Chen, Jianli Ren, Zongwei Liu, Dongsheng Cui, Shuaishuai Wang, Jiaxue Bi, Xiangchen Dai","doi":"10.1177/17085381241273233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify independent predictors of thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD or intramural hematoma (IMH) from April 2014 to April 2023 was performed. The baseline morphological data of TBAD was established through computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge. Patients were divided into two groups based on aortic growth: growth and no growth. Aortic growth defined as an increase ≥5 mm in thoracic maximal aortic diameter during any serial follow-up CTA measurement. Logistic regression following propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify independent predictors for aortic growth. Receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff value of independent predictors were calculated. Linear regression was used to establish a correlation between anatomical variables and follow-up aortic diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 patients with TBAD (<i>n</i> = 122) or IMH (<i>n</i> = 23) undergoing TEVAR were included, with a male of 83.4% and a mean age of 56 ± 14.1 years. Patients in growth group and no growth group was 26 (17.9%) and 119 (80.1%), respectively. After using PSM method, matched regression analysis showed residual maximal tear diameter (OR = 0.889, 95% CI 0.830-0.952, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and follow-up aortic diameter (OR = 0.977, 95% CI 0.965-0.989, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independent predictors for aortic growth. The cutoff value was 8.55 mm for residual tear diameter and 40.65 mm for follow-up maximal aortic diameter. The residual maximal tear diameter showed a linear correlation with follow-up aortic diameter (DW = 1.74, R2 = 6.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that residual maximal tear diameter >8.55 mm and follow-up aortic diameter >40.65 mm could predict aortic growth in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors for thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.\",\"authors\":\"Yonghui Chen, Jianli Ren, Zongwei Liu, Dongsheng Cui, Shuaishuai Wang, Jiaxue Bi, Xiangchen Dai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381241273233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify independent predictors of thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD or intramural hematoma (IMH) from April 2014 to April 2023 was performed. The baseline morphological data of TBAD was established through computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge. Patients were divided into two groups based on aortic growth: growth and no growth. Aortic growth defined as an increase ≥5 mm in thoracic maximal aortic diameter during any serial follow-up CTA measurement. Logistic regression following propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify independent predictors for aortic growth. Receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff value of independent predictors were calculated. Linear regression was used to establish a correlation between anatomical variables and follow-up aortic diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 patients with TBAD (<i>n</i> = 122) or IMH (<i>n</i> = 23) undergoing TEVAR were included, with a male of 83.4% and a mean age of 56 ± 14.1 years. Patients in growth group and no growth group was 26 (17.9%) and 119 (80.1%), respectively. After using PSM method, matched regression analysis showed residual maximal tear diameter (OR = 0.889, 95% CI 0.830-0.952, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and follow-up aortic diameter (OR = 0.977, 95% CI 0.965-0.989, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independent predictors for aortic growth. The cutoff value was 8.55 mm for residual tear diameter and 40.65 mm for follow-up maximal aortic diameter. The residual maximal tear diameter showed a linear correlation with follow-up aortic diameter (DW = 1.74, R2 = 6.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggested that residual maximal tear diameter >8.55 mm and follow-up aortic diameter >40.65 mm could predict aortic growth in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241273233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241273233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要确定接受胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)的 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者胸主动脉生长的独立预测因素:方法:对2014年4月至2023年4月期间因TBAD或壁内血肿(IMH)接受TEVAR手术的患者进行回顾性分析。出院前通过计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)确定 TBAD 的基线形态学数据。根据主动脉生长情况将患者分为两组:生长组和无生长组。主动脉生长是指在任何连续随访的CTA测量中,胸主动脉最大直径增加≥5毫米。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)后的逻辑回归来确定主动脉生长的独立预测因素。计算了接收者操作特征曲线和独立预测因子的临界值。线性回归用于建立解剖变量与随访主动脉直径之间的相关性:共纳入145例接受TEVAR手术的TBAD(122例)或IMH(23例)患者,其中男性占83.4%,平均年龄(56±14.1)岁。生长组和无生长组患者分别为 26 人(17.9%)和 119 人(80.1%)。使用 PSM 方法后,匹配回归分析显示残余最大撕裂直径(OR = 0.889,95% CI 0.830-0.952,P = 0.001)和随访主动脉直径(OR = 0.977,95% CI 0.965-0.989,P < 0.001)是主动脉生长的独立预测因素。残留撕裂直径的临界值为 8.55 毫米,随访主动脉最大直径的临界值为 40.65 毫米。残余最大撕裂直径与随访主动脉直径呈线性相关(DW = 1.74,R2 = 6.2%,P = 0.033):这项研究表明,残余最大撕裂直径>8.55毫米和随访主动脉直径>40.65毫米可以预测接受TEVAR的TBAD患者的主动脉生长情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors for thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Objective: To identify independent predictors of thoracic aortic growth in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD or intramural hematoma (IMH) from April 2014 to April 2023 was performed. The baseline morphological data of TBAD was established through computed tomography angiography (CTA) before discharge. Patients were divided into two groups based on aortic growth: growth and no growth. Aortic growth defined as an increase ≥5 mm in thoracic maximal aortic diameter during any serial follow-up CTA measurement. Logistic regression following propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify independent predictors for aortic growth. Receiver operating characteristic curve and cutoff value of independent predictors were calculated. Linear regression was used to establish a correlation between anatomical variables and follow-up aortic diameter.

Results: A total of 145 patients with TBAD (n = 122) or IMH (n = 23) undergoing TEVAR were included, with a male of 83.4% and a mean age of 56 ± 14.1 years. Patients in growth group and no growth group was 26 (17.9%) and 119 (80.1%), respectively. After using PSM method, matched regression analysis showed residual maximal tear diameter (OR = 0.889, 95% CI 0.830-0.952, p = 0.001) and follow-up aortic diameter (OR = 0.977, 95% CI 0.965-0.989, p < 0.001) were independent predictors for aortic growth. The cutoff value was 8.55 mm for residual tear diameter and 40.65 mm for follow-up maximal aortic diameter. The residual maximal tear diameter showed a linear correlation with follow-up aortic diameter (DW = 1.74, R2 = 6.2%, p = 0.033).

Conclusions: This study suggested that residual maximal tear diameter >8.55 mm and follow-up aortic diameter >40.65 mm could predict aortic growth in patients with TBAD undergoing TEVAR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Comparative outcomes of surgical and conservative management in carotid artery dissection. Physician-modified funnel-shaped covered stent for selective false lumen exclusion in chronic type B aortic dissection. Embolization of a ruptured cystic artery pseudoaneurysm by percutaneous injection. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with development of surgical site infection after lower-limb revascularization surgery. Malnutrition is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1