通过远程患者监控加强术后抗凝治疗:评估心脏手术随访中便携式凝血仪和聊天机器人的交叉试验研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2024-08-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076241269515
Federico Guede-Fernández, Tiago Silva Pinto, Helena Semedo, Clara Vital, Pedro Coelho, Maria Eduarda Oliosi, Salomé Azevedo, Pedro Dias, Ana Londral
{"title":"通过远程患者监控加强术后抗凝治疗:评估心脏手术随访中便携式凝血仪和聊天机器人的交叉试验研究。","authors":"Federico Guede-Fernández, Tiago Silva Pinto, Helena Semedo, Clara Vital, Pedro Coelho, Maria Eduarda Oliosi, Salomé Azevedo, Pedro Dias, Ana Londral","doi":"10.1177/20552076241269515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A crossover trial assigned participants to SOC-RPM or RPM-SOC, starting with the standard of care (SOC) for the first 6 months after surgery and using RPM for the following 6 months, or vice-versa, respectively. During RPM, patients used the Coaguchek<sup>©</sup> to accurately measure International Normalized Ratio values and a mobile text-based chatbot to report PROs and adjust the therapeutic dosage. The study assessed patients' and clinicians' experience with RPM and compared direct costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients participated. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) levels during RPM were 72.2% and 50.6% for the SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively, and during SOC, they were 49.4% and 58.4% for SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively. Patients and the clinical team reported high trust and satisfaction with the proposed digital service. Statistically significant differences were only found in the cost of RPM in the RPM-SOC, which was higher than SOC in the SOC-RPM arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Portable coagulometers and chatbots can enhance the remote management of patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy, improving patient experience. This presents a promising alternative to the current standard procedure. The results of this study seem to suggest that RPM may have a higher value when initiated after a SOC period rather than starting RPM immediately after surgery.<i>Trial registration:</i> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06423521.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing postoperative anticoagulation therapy with remote patient monitoring: A pilot crossover trial study to evaluate portable coagulometers and chatbots in cardiac surgery follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Guede-Fernández, Tiago Silva Pinto, Helena Semedo, Clara Vital, Pedro Coelho, Maria Eduarda Oliosi, Salomé Azevedo, Pedro Dias, Ana Londral\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076241269515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A crossover trial assigned participants to SOC-RPM or RPM-SOC, starting with the standard of care (SOC) for the first 6 months after surgery and using RPM for the following 6 months, or vice-versa, respectively. During RPM, patients used the Coaguchek<sup>©</sup> to accurately measure International Normalized Ratio values and a mobile text-based chatbot to report PROs and adjust the therapeutic dosage. The study assessed patients' and clinicians' experience with RPM and compared direct costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients participated. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) levels during RPM were 72.2% and 50.6% for the SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively, and during SOC, they were 49.4% and 58.4% for SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively. Patients and the clinical team reported high trust and satisfaction with the proposed digital service. Statistically significant differences were only found in the cost of RPM in the RPM-SOC, which was higher than SOC in the SOC-RPM arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Portable coagulometers and chatbots can enhance the remote management of patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy, improving patient experience. This presents a promising alternative to the current standard procedure. The results of this study seem to suggest that RPM may have a higher value when initiated after a SOC period rather than starting RPM immediately after surgery.<i>Trial registration:</i> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06423521.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319326/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241269515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241269515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:之前的研究尚未评估远程患者监护(RPM)系统对心脏手术后接受抗凝治疗的患者的价值。本研究旨在评估通过 RPM 进行临床随访是否能获得与标准方案相当的结果:一项交叉试验将参与者分配到 SOC-RPM 或 RPM-SOC,术后前 6 个月开始使用标准护理(SOC),随后 6 个月使用 RPM,反之亦然。在 RPM 期间,患者使用 Coaguchek© 准确测量国际标准化比率值,并使用基于移动文本的聊天机器人报告 PROs 和调整治疗剂量。研究评估了患者和临床医生使用 RPM 的体验,并比较了直接成本:27名患者参与了研究。在 RPM 期间,SOC-RPM 和 RPM-SOC 两组在治疗范围内的中位时间(TTR)分别为 72.2% 和 50.6%;在 SOC 期间,SOC-RPM 和 RPM-SOC 两组在治疗范围内的中位时间分别为 49.4% 和 58.4%。患者和临床团队对拟议的数字化服务表示高度信任和满意。只有在RPM-SOC中发现了统计学上的重大差异,在SOC-RPM臂中,RPM的成本高于SOC:便携式凝血仪和聊天机器人可加强对接受抗凝治疗患者的远程管理,改善患者体验。这为当前的标准程序提供了一个很有前景的替代方案。这项研究的结果似乎表明,如果在SOC期后启动RPM,而不是在手术后立即开始RPM,RPM的价值可能更高:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06423521。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing postoperative anticoagulation therapy with remote patient monitoring: A pilot crossover trial study to evaluate portable coagulometers and chatbots in cardiac surgery follow-up.

Objective: Prior research has not assessed the value of remote patient monitoring (RPM) systems for patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy after cardiac surgery. This study aims to assess whether the clinical follow-up through RPM yields comparable outcomes with the standard protocol.

Methods: A crossover trial assigned participants to SOC-RPM or RPM-SOC, starting with the standard of care (SOC) for the first 6 months after surgery and using RPM for the following 6 months, or vice-versa, respectively. During RPM, patients used the Coaguchek© to accurately measure International Normalized Ratio values and a mobile text-based chatbot to report PROs and adjust the therapeutic dosage. The study assessed patients' and clinicians' experience with RPM and compared direct costs.

Results: Twenty-seven patients participated. The median time in therapeutic range (TTR) levels during RPM were 72.2% and 50.6% for the SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively, and during SOC, they were 49.4% and 58.4% for SOC-RPM and RPM-SOC arms, respectively. Patients and the clinical team reported high trust and satisfaction with the proposed digital service. Statistically significant differences were only found in the cost of RPM in the RPM-SOC, which was higher than SOC in the SOC-RPM arm.

Conclusions: Portable coagulometers and chatbots can enhance the remote management of patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy, improving patient experience. This presents a promising alternative to the current standard procedure. The results of this study seem to suggest that RPM may have a higher value when initiated after a SOC period rather than starting RPM immediately after surgery.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06423521.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
期刊最新文献
A feasibility study on utilizing machine learning technology to reduce the costs of gastric cancer screening in Taizhou, China. Ageing well with tech: Exploring the determinants of e-healthcare services adoption in an emerging economy. Chinese colposcopists' attitudes toward the colposcopic artificial intelligence auxiliary diagnostic system (CAIADS): A nation-wide, multi-center survey. Digital leadership: Norwegian healthcare managers' attitudes towards using digital tools. Disease characteristics influence the privacy calculus to adopt electronic health records: A survey study in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1