儿科住院医生中的冒名顶替现象:基于经验的模拟教育研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Turkish archives of pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23210
Bahadır M Samur, Furkan Maraşlı, İsmail Dursun
{"title":"儿科住院医生中的冒名顶替现象:基于经验的模拟教育研究。","authors":"Bahadır M Samur, Furkan Maraşlı, İsmail Dursun","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The imposter phenomenon (IP) may have a negative impact on the ability of healthcare providers to make difficult and accurate decisions. This study presents an empirical approach, segregating the real imposters based on a simulation, and aims to investigate the prevalence and severity of IP and evaluate the attitude in the decision-making process of pediatric residents with impostorism. A simulation-based case study with the 113 pediatric residents was performed with the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale to identify IP scores and appropriate management skills for the case. The collected data were divided and combined into different categories based on the IP scale scores and the success of case management to further detect how real imposters were affected. Our study revealed that 24 (21.2%) of residents have moderate, 33 (25.7%) of residents have frequent, and 29 (29.2%) of residents have intense impostorism feelings. The imposter scores were found to be higher among female participants (P = .006). However, when considering the prevalence of significant impostorism (defined as both frequent and intense), there was no statistically significant difference between females and males (P = .088). The data indicated that an increase in IP scores was associated with a higher likelihood of delayed pressing the help button for both the overall and post-exclusion groups (P < .001). The analysis also revealed a significant correlation and a monotonic-linear trend between IP scores and the decision-making process, even after excluding the unsuccessful participants (P < .001). This is the first study to demonstrate the prevalence of IP among pediatric residents, potentially leading to challenges in patient care and resulting in delayed decisionmaking and self-doubt with feelings of inadequacy. The findings support the claim that higher imposter scores are associated with a greater tendency to seek help from more experienced individuals, even when fully capable of managing cases independently. This emphasizes the importance of awareness about the IP, as these factors can directly impact both the well-being of trainees and patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imposter Phenomenon in Pediatric Residency: An Empirical Simulation-Based Educational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bahadır M Samur, Furkan Maraşlı, İsmail Dursun\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The imposter phenomenon (IP) may have a negative impact on the ability of healthcare providers to make difficult and accurate decisions. This study presents an empirical approach, segregating the real imposters based on a simulation, and aims to investigate the prevalence and severity of IP and evaluate the attitude in the decision-making process of pediatric residents with impostorism. A simulation-based case study with the 113 pediatric residents was performed with the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale to identify IP scores and appropriate management skills for the case. The collected data were divided and combined into different categories based on the IP scale scores and the success of case management to further detect how real imposters were affected. Our study revealed that 24 (21.2%) of residents have moderate, 33 (25.7%) of residents have frequent, and 29 (29.2%) of residents have intense impostorism feelings. The imposter scores were found to be higher among female participants (P = .006). However, when considering the prevalence of significant impostorism (defined as both frequent and intense), there was no statistically significant difference between females and males (P = .088). The data indicated that an increase in IP scores was associated with a higher likelihood of delayed pressing the help button for both the overall and post-exclusion groups (P < .001). The analysis also revealed a significant correlation and a monotonic-linear trend between IP scores and the decision-making process, even after excluding the unsuccessful participants (P < .001). This is the first study to demonstrate the prevalence of IP among pediatric residents, potentially leading to challenges in patient care and resulting in delayed decisionmaking and self-doubt with feelings of inadequacy. The findings support the claim that higher imposter scores are associated with a greater tendency to seek help from more experienced individuals, even when fully capable of managing cases independently. This emphasizes the importance of awareness about the IP, as these factors can directly impact both the well-being of trainees and patient care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish archives of pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

冒名顶替现象(IP)可能会对医护人员做出困难而准确的决策产生负面影响。本研究采用实证方法,在模拟的基础上分离出真正的冒名顶替者,旨在调查冒名顶替现象的发生率和严重程度,并评估儿科住院医师在决策过程中对冒名顶替现象的态度。研究人员对 113 名儿科住院医师进行了模拟病例研究,采用克兰斯冒名顶替现象量表来确定 IP 评分和适当的病例管理技能。根据 IP 量表得分和病例管理的成功率,将收集到的数据分为不同的类别,以进一步检测真正的冒名顶替者是如何受到影响的。我们的研究显示,24(21.2%)名居民有中度的冒名情绪,33(25.7%)名居民有频繁的冒名情绪,29(29.2%)名居民有强烈的冒名情绪。研究发现,女性参与者的冒名得分更高(P = .006)。然而,当考虑到明显的冒名顶替现象(定义为频繁和强烈)的发生率时,女性和男性之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P = .088)。数据显示,IP 分数的增加与总体组和排除后组延迟按下帮助按钮的可能性增加有关(P < .001)。分析还显示,IP 分数与决策过程之间存在明显的相关性和单调线性趋势,即使在排除不成功的参与者之后也是如此(P < .001)。这是第一项证明 IP 在儿科住院医师中普遍存在的研究,IP 有可能导致患者护理中的挑战,并导致决策延迟和自我怀疑,产生不安全感。研究结果支持这样一种说法,即冒名顶替者得分越高,越倾向于向更有经验的人寻求帮助,即使完全有能力独立处理病例。这就强调了提高对 IP 认识的重要性,因为这些因素会直接影响受训者的健康和病人护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Imposter Phenomenon in Pediatric Residency: An Empirical Simulation-Based Educational Study.

The imposter phenomenon (IP) may have a negative impact on the ability of healthcare providers to make difficult and accurate decisions. This study presents an empirical approach, segregating the real imposters based on a simulation, and aims to investigate the prevalence and severity of IP and evaluate the attitude in the decision-making process of pediatric residents with impostorism. A simulation-based case study with the 113 pediatric residents was performed with the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale to identify IP scores and appropriate management skills for the case. The collected data were divided and combined into different categories based on the IP scale scores and the success of case management to further detect how real imposters were affected. Our study revealed that 24 (21.2%) of residents have moderate, 33 (25.7%) of residents have frequent, and 29 (29.2%) of residents have intense impostorism feelings. The imposter scores were found to be higher among female participants (P = .006). However, when considering the prevalence of significant impostorism (defined as both frequent and intense), there was no statistically significant difference between females and males (P = .088). The data indicated that an increase in IP scores was associated with a higher likelihood of delayed pressing the help button for both the overall and post-exclusion groups (P < .001). The analysis also revealed a significant correlation and a monotonic-linear trend between IP scores and the decision-making process, even after excluding the unsuccessful participants (P < .001). This is the first study to demonstrate the prevalence of IP among pediatric residents, potentially leading to challenges in patient care and resulting in delayed decisionmaking and self-doubt with feelings of inadequacy. The findings support the claim that higher imposter scores are associated with a greater tendency to seek help from more experienced individuals, even when fully capable of managing cases independently. This emphasizes the importance of awareness about the IP, as these factors can directly impact both the well-being of trainees and patient care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Alarming Sign of Nebulized Ipratropium Bromide in a Case Series: Anisocoria. Clinical and Prognostic Characteristics in Childhood Osteosarcoma: A Single-Center Experience in Türkiye. Clinical Outcomes of Oral Antibiotic Switch in Children with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Cholestatic Infants with Biliary Atresia. Evaluation of Children with Aortic Coarctation: A Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1