直接面向消费者的测试是由消费者发起的测试:对测试过程的妥协和提高质量的机会。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1515/cclm-2024-0876
Patti Shih, Sverre Sandberg, Jan Balla, Banu Isbilen Basok, Jennifer J Brady, Bernard Croal, Nathalie De Vos, Mathias Karlsson, Piret Kedars, Tomris Ozben, Marina Pijanovic, Mario Plebani, Matthias Orth
{"title":"直接面向消费者的测试是由消费者发起的测试:对测试过程的妥协和提高质量的机会。","authors":"Patti Shih, Sverre Sandberg, Jan Balla, Banu Isbilen Basok, Jennifer J Brady, Bernard Croal, Nathalie De Vos, Mathias Karlsson, Piret Kedars, Tomris Ozben, Marina Pijanovic, Mario Plebani, Matthias Orth","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-0876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) refers to commercial laboratory tests initiated by laypersons without the involvement of healthcare professionals. As this market grows in size and variety of products, a clear definition of DTCT to ground the conceptualization of their harms and benefits is needed. We describe how three different modalities of DTCT (home self-testing, self-sampled tests, and direct access tests) present caveats to the traditional testing process ('brain-to-brain loop'), and how this might differ between medical vs. non-medical laboratories. We make recommendations for ways to improve quality and reduce errors with respect to DTCT. The potential benefits and harms of DTCT will invariably depend on the context and situation of individual consumers and the types of tests involved. Importantly, implications for both consumers and the healthcare system should be considered, such as the effects on improving health outcomes and reducing unnecessary testing and use of clinical resources. 'Consumer initiation' must be a central defining characteristic of DTCT, to clearly demarcate the key drawbacks as well as opportunities of this type of testing from a laboratory specialists' perspective. The concept of 'consumer initiated testing' should also help define DTCT regulation, and provide a locus of efforts to support consumers as the main decision-makers in the purchasing and conducting of these tests in the absence of clinician gatekeeping.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct-to-consumer testing as consumer initiated testing: compromises to the testing process and opportunities for quality improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Patti Shih, Sverre Sandberg, Jan Balla, Banu Isbilen Basok, Jennifer J Brady, Bernard Croal, Nathalie De Vos, Mathias Karlsson, Piret Kedars, Tomris Ozben, Marina Pijanovic, Mario Plebani, Matthias Orth\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-0876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) refers to commercial laboratory tests initiated by laypersons without the involvement of healthcare professionals. As this market grows in size and variety of products, a clear definition of DTCT to ground the conceptualization of their harms and benefits is needed. We describe how three different modalities of DTCT (home self-testing, self-sampled tests, and direct access tests) present caveats to the traditional testing process ('brain-to-brain loop'), and how this might differ between medical vs. non-medical laboratories. We make recommendations for ways to improve quality and reduce errors with respect to DTCT. The potential benefits and harms of DTCT will invariably depend on the context and situation of individual consumers and the types of tests involved. Importantly, implications for both consumers and the healthcare system should be considered, such as the effects on improving health outcomes and reducing unnecessary testing and use of clinical resources. 'Consumer initiation' must be a central defining characteristic of DTCT, to clearly demarcate the key drawbacks as well as opportunities of this type of testing from a laboratory specialists' perspective. The concept of 'consumer initiated testing' should also help define DTCT regulation, and provide a locus of efforts to support consumers as the main decision-makers in the purchasing and conducting of these tests in the absence of clinician gatekeeping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0876\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-0876","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接面向消费者检测(DTCT)是指由非专业人员在没有医疗保健专业人员参与的情况下发起的商业实验室检测。随着这一市场规模的扩大和产品种类的增多,需要对 DTCT 进行明确的定义,以便将其危害和益处概念化。我们描述了三种不同的 DTCT 模式(家庭自我检测、自我采样检测和直接获取检测)如何对传统检测过程("脑-脑循环")提出警告,以及医疗实验室与非医疗实验室之间的区别。我们就如何提高 DTCT 的质量和减少错误提出了建议。DTCT 的潜在益处和害处无一例外地取决于消费者个人的背景和情况以及所涉及的检测类型。重要的是,应考虑对消费者和医疗系统的影响,如对改善健康结果、减少不必要的检查和临床资源使用的影响。消费者发起 "必须成为 DTCT 的一个核心定义特征,以便从实验室专家的角度明确划分这类检测的主要缺点和机遇。消费者主动检测 "的概念也应有助于界定 DTCT 的监管,并提供一个努力的方向,以支持消费者在没有临床医生把关的情况下作为购买和进行这些检测的主要决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct-to-consumer testing as consumer initiated testing: compromises to the testing process and opportunities for quality improvement.

Direct-to-consumer testing (DTCT) refers to commercial laboratory tests initiated by laypersons without the involvement of healthcare professionals. As this market grows in size and variety of products, a clear definition of DTCT to ground the conceptualization of their harms and benefits is needed. We describe how three different modalities of DTCT (home self-testing, self-sampled tests, and direct access tests) present caveats to the traditional testing process ('brain-to-brain loop'), and how this might differ between medical vs. non-medical laboratories. We make recommendations for ways to improve quality and reduce errors with respect to DTCT. The potential benefits and harms of DTCT will invariably depend on the context and situation of individual consumers and the types of tests involved. Importantly, implications for both consumers and the healthcare system should be considered, such as the effects on improving health outcomes and reducing unnecessary testing and use of clinical resources. 'Consumer initiation' must be a central defining characteristic of DTCT, to clearly demarcate the key drawbacks as well as opportunities of this type of testing from a laboratory specialists' perspective. The concept of 'consumer initiated testing' should also help define DTCT regulation, and provide a locus of efforts to support consumers as the main decision-makers in the purchasing and conducting of these tests in the absence of clinician gatekeeping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
期刊最新文献
A vision to the future: value-based laboratory medicine Inaccuracy definition of Bence Jones proteinuria in the EFLM Urinalysis Guideline 2023. Construction of platelet count-optical method reflex test rules using Micro-RBC#, Macro-RBC%, "PLT clumps?" flag, and "PLT abnormal histogram" flag on the Mindray BC-6800plus hematology analyzer in clinical practice. Why is single sample rule out of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T safe when analytical imprecision is so high? A joint statistical and clinical demonstration. Circulating tumor DNA measurement: a new pillar of medical oncology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1