拔除基牙后的疼痛控制策略:随机临床试验的系统回顾。

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Current Pediatric Reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.2174/0115733963292710240725051920
Janina Rodrigues, Luiz Felipe Palma, Gabriela Seabra da Silva, Lucas Santiago França, Lívia Araújo Alves, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Tamara Kerber Tedesco
{"title":"拔除基牙后的疼痛控制策略:随机临床试验的系统回顾。","authors":"Janina Rodrigues, Luiz Felipe Palma, Gabriela Seabra da Silva, Lucas Santiago França, Lívia Araújo Alves, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Tamara Kerber Tedesco","doi":"10.2174/0115733963292710240725051920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In dental extractions, particularly when local anesthesia is used, it usually offers analgesic relief for a few hours. However, pain can become a notable concern in the immediate postoperative period due to the trauma experienced by both soft and hard oral tissues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the most effective strategies for managing postoperative pain in primary tooth extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two examiners conducted a search across five electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and OpenGray. Studies were included if they met the following criteria after reviewing their titles and abstracts: they involved children and evaluated pain management following primary tooth extraction. Subsequently, articles that described extractions performed under any form of sedation, were not conducted under local anesthesia, in an outpatient setting, and in children aged 0 to 12 years, or were not randomized controlled trials, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 374 relevant articles, of which 9 were included. Among these, 5 utilized preoperative medications as a pain management strategy, one evaluated low-level laser therapy (LLLT) postoperatively, one assessed calendula drops postoperatively, and another explored virtual reality during the procedure and arnica in solution both pre and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among all the strategies evaluated, the strategy involving analgesics administered 30 minutes before tooth extractions was supported by better-designed studies. However, there is a high risk of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":11175,"journal":{"name":"Current Pediatric Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for Pain Management after Extraction of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Janina Rodrigues, Luiz Felipe Palma, Gabriela Seabra da Silva, Lucas Santiago França, Lívia Araújo Alves, Daniela Prócida Raggio, Tamara Kerber Tedesco\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115733963292710240725051920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In dental extractions, particularly when local anesthesia is used, it usually offers analgesic relief for a few hours. However, pain can become a notable concern in the immediate postoperative period due to the trauma experienced by both soft and hard oral tissues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the most effective strategies for managing postoperative pain in primary tooth extractions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two examiners conducted a search across five electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and OpenGray. Studies were included if they met the following criteria after reviewing their titles and abstracts: they involved children and evaluated pain management following primary tooth extraction. Subsequently, articles that described extractions performed under any form of sedation, were not conducted under local anesthesia, in an outpatient setting, and in children aged 0 to 12 years, or were not randomized controlled trials, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 374 relevant articles, of which 9 were included. Among these, 5 utilized preoperative medications as a pain management strategy, one evaluated low-level laser therapy (LLLT) postoperatively, one assessed calendula drops postoperatively, and another explored virtual reality during the procedure and arnica in solution both pre and postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among all the strategies evaluated, the strategy involving analgesics administered 30 minutes before tooth extractions was supported by better-designed studies. However, there is a high risk of bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pediatric Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pediatric Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733963292710240725051920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pediatric Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115733963292710240725051920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在牙科拔牙手术中,尤其是使用局部麻醉时,通常可在数小时内缓解疼痛。然而,由于口腔软组织和硬组织受到的创伤,疼痛可能会在术后立即成为一个值得关注的问题:本系统综述旨在评估处理基牙拔除术后疼痛的最有效策略:方法: 两名审查员对五个电子数据库进行了检索:方法: 两名审查员在五个电子数据库中进行了检索:MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CENTRAL 和 OpenGray。在审阅了研究的标题和摘要后,符合以下标准的研究均被纳入:涉及儿童并评估了拔除原牙后的疼痛管理。随后,排除了描述在任何形式的镇静剂下进行拔牙、未在局部麻醉下进行拔牙、在门诊环境下进行拔牙、拔牙对象为 0 至 12 岁儿童或非随机对照试验的文章:结果:搜索结果显示有 374 篇相关文章,其中 9 篇被纳入。其中,5 篇文章采用术前用药作为疼痛管理策略,1 篇文章评估了术后低强度激光疗法(LLLT),1 篇文章评估了术后金盏花滴剂,另一篇文章探讨了手术过程中的虚拟现实技术以及术前和术后的山金车溶液:结论:在所有评估策略中,拔牙前 30 分钟使用镇痛剂的策略得到了设计较好的研究的支持。然而,存在偏倚的风险很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategies for Pain Management after Extraction of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background: In dental extractions, particularly when local anesthesia is used, it usually offers analgesic relief for a few hours. However, pain can become a notable concern in the immediate postoperative period due to the trauma experienced by both soft and hard oral tissues.

Objectives: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the most effective strategies for managing postoperative pain in primary tooth extractions.

Methods: Two examiners conducted a search across five electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and OpenGray. Studies were included if they met the following criteria after reviewing their titles and abstracts: they involved children and evaluated pain management following primary tooth extraction. Subsequently, articles that described extractions performed under any form of sedation, were not conducted under local anesthesia, in an outpatient setting, and in children aged 0 to 12 years, or were not randomized controlled trials, were excluded.

Results: The search yielded 374 relevant articles, of which 9 were included. Among these, 5 utilized preoperative medications as a pain management strategy, one evaluated low-level laser therapy (LLLT) postoperatively, one assessed calendula drops postoperatively, and another explored virtual reality during the procedure and arnica in solution both pre and postoperatively.

Conclusion: Among all the strategies evaluated, the strategy involving analgesics administered 30 minutes before tooth extractions was supported by better-designed studies. However, there is a high risk of bias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Current Pediatric Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances in pediatric medicine. The journal’s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in pediatric medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Newborn Pulse Oximetry Screening for Detecting Critical Congenital Heart Defects: A Narrative Review. Cardiology Consult for the General Pediatrician after Cardiac Manifestations from a SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Current Understanding and Challenges for the Future. Practical Way to Use Supraglottic Airway Device. A Quantitative Review of Un-licensed and Off-label Medicines Use in Children Aged 0-2 Years in the Private Sector in South Africa: Extent, Challenges, and Implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1