急性一氧化碳吸入和/或热水浸泡会短暂增加女性的促红细胞生成素,但不会增加男性的促红细胞生成素。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Experimental Physiology Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1113/EP091923
Kaitlyn G. DiMarco, Christopher L. Chapman, Natasha E. Weiser, Emma R. Matsell, Kathryn M. Lucernoni, Samantha Chacon, Margaret M. B. Grivette, John R. Halliwill, Andrew T. Lovering, Christopher T. Minson
{"title":"急性一氧化碳吸入和/或热水浸泡会短暂增加女性的促红细胞生成素,但不会增加男性的促红细胞生成素。","authors":"Kaitlyn G. DiMarco,&nbsp;Christopher L. Chapman,&nbsp;Natasha E. Weiser,&nbsp;Emma R. Matsell,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Lucernoni,&nbsp;Samantha Chacon,&nbsp;Margaret M. B. Grivette,&nbsp;John R. Halliwill,&nbsp;Andrew T. Lovering,&nbsp;Christopher T. Minson","doi":"10.1113/EP091923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of acute carbon monoxide inhalation (COi) and hot water immersion (HWI) are of growing interest as interventions to stimulate erythropoietin (EPO) production. However, whether EPO production is further augmented when combining these stressors and whether there are sex differences in this response are poorly understood. Therefore, we measured circulating EPO concentration in response to acute COi and HWI independently and in combination and determined whether the responses were altered by sex. Participants completed three study visits—COi, HWI, and combined COi and HWI—separated by 1 week in a randomized, balanced, crossover design. Renal blood velocity was measured during all interventions, and carboxyhaemoglobin was measured during and after COi. Serum samples were analysed every hour for 6 h post-intervention for EPO concentration. HWI decreased renal blood velocity (46.2 cm/s to 36.2 cm/s) (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.0001), and COi increased carboxyhaemoglobin (1.5%–12.8%) (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.0001) without changing renal blood velocity (46.4–45.2 cm/s) (<i>P</i> = 0.4456). All three interventions increased peak EPO concentration from baseline (COi: 6.02–9.74 mIU/mL; HWI: 6.80–11.10 mIU/mL; COi + HWI: 6.71–10.91 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0048) and to the same extent (<i>P</i> = 0.3505). On average, females increased EPO while males did not in response to COi (females: 6.17 mIU/mL; males: 1.27 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0010), HWI (females: 6.47 mIU/mL; males: 2.14 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0104), and COi and HWI (females: 6.65 mIU/mL; males: 1.76 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0256). These data emphasize that combining these interventions does not augment EPO secretion and that these interventions may work better in females.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":"109 10","pages":"1782-1795"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute exposure to carbon monoxide inhalation and/or hot water immersion transiently increases erythropoietin in females but not in males\",\"authors\":\"Kaitlyn G. DiMarco,&nbsp;Christopher L. Chapman,&nbsp;Natasha E. Weiser,&nbsp;Emma R. Matsell,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Lucernoni,&nbsp;Samantha Chacon,&nbsp;Margaret M. B. Grivette,&nbsp;John R. Halliwill,&nbsp;Andrew T. Lovering,&nbsp;Christopher T. Minson\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP091923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The use of acute carbon monoxide inhalation (COi) and hot water immersion (HWI) are of growing interest as interventions to stimulate erythropoietin (EPO) production. However, whether EPO production is further augmented when combining these stressors and whether there are sex differences in this response are poorly understood. Therefore, we measured circulating EPO concentration in response to acute COi and HWI independently and in combination and determined whether the responses were altered by sex. Participants completed three study visits—COi, HWI, and combined COi and HWI—separated by 1 week in a randomized, balanced, crossover design. Renal blood velocity was measured during all interventions, and carboxyhaemoglobin was measured during and after COi. Serum samples were analysed every hour for 6 h post-intervention for EPO concentration. HWI decreased renal blood velocity (46.2 cm/s to 36.2 cm/s) (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.0001), and COi increased carboxyhaemoglobin (1.5%–12.8%) (<i>P </i>&lt; 0.0001) without changing renal blood velocity (46.4–45.2 cm/s) (<i>P</i> = 0.4456). All three interventions increased peak EPO concentration from baseline (COi: 6.02–9.74 mIU/mL; HWI: 6.80–11.10 mIU/mL; COi + HWI: 6.71–10.91 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0048) and to the same extent (<i>P</i> = 0.3505). On average, females increased EPO while males did not in response to COi (females: 6.17 mIU/mL; males: 1.27 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0010), HWI (females: 6.47 mIU/mL; males: 2.14 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0104), and COi and HWI (females: 6.65 mIU/mL; males: 1.76 mIU/mL) (<i>P</i> = 0.0256). These data emphasize that combining these interventions does not augment EPO secretion and that these interventions may work better in females.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\"109 10\",\"pages\":\"1782-1795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11442759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1113/EP091923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用急性一氧化碳吸入(COi)和热水浸泡(HWI)作为刺激促红细胞生成素(EPO)产生的干预措施越来越受到关注。然而,人们对结合使用这些应激源时 EPO 的生成是否会进一步增加以及这种反应是否存在性别差异还知之甚少。因此,我们分别测量了急性 COi 和 HWI 反应时的循环 EPO 浓度,并确定了这些反应是否会因性别而改变。在随机、平衡、交叉设计中,参与者完成了三次研究访问--COi、HWI、COi 和 HWI 合并访问,每次间隔 1 周。在所有干预期间都测量了肾血流速度,在 COi 期间和之后测量了碳氧血红蛋白。在干预后的 6 小时内,每隔一小时对血清样本进行一次 EPO 浓度分析。HWI 降低了肾脏血流速度(从 46.2 厘米/秒降至 36.2 厘米/秒)(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute exposure to carbon monoxide inhalation and/or hot water immersion transiently increases erythropoietin in females but not in males

The use of acute carbon monoxide inhalation (COi) and hot water immersion (HWI) are of growing interest as interventions to stimulate erythropoietin (EPO) production. However, whether EPO production is further augmented when combining these stressors and whether there are sex differences in this response are poorly understood. Therefore, we measured circulating EPO concentration in response to acute COi and HWI independently and in combination and determined whether the responses were altered by sex. Participants completed three study visits—COi, HWI, and combined COi and HWI—separated by 1 week in a randomized, balanced, crossover design. Renal blood velocity was measured during all interventions, and carboxyhaemoglobin was measured during and after COi. Serum samples were analysed every hour for 6 h post-intervention for EPO concentration. HWI decreased renal blood velocity (46.2 cm/s to 36.2 cm/s) (< 0.0001), and COi increased carboxyhaemoglobin (1.5%–12.8%) (< 0.0001) without changing renal blood velocity (46.4–45.2 cm/s) (P = 0.4456). All three interventions increased peak EPO concentration from baseline (COi: 6.02–9.74 mIU/mL; HWI: 6.80–11.10 mIU/mL; COi + HWI: 6.71–10.91 mIU/mL) (P = 0.0048) and to the same extent (P = 0.3505). On average, females increased EPO while males did not in response to COi (females: 6.17 mIU/mL; males: 1.27 mIU/mL) (P = 0.0010), HWI (females: 6.47 mIU/mL; males: 2.14 mIU/mL) (P = 0.0104), and COi and HWI (females: 6.65 mIU/mL; males: 1.76 mIU/mL) (P = 0.0256). These data emphasize that combining these interventions does not augment EPO secretion and that these interventions may work better in females.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Physiology
Experimental Physiology 医学-生理学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged. Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
My journey from an early researcher to an aspiring medic: A dance from bench to bedside. Brown and beige adipose tissue-derived metabokine and lipokine inter-organ signalling in health and disease. Imaging the large-scale and cellular response to focal traumatic brain injury in mouse neocortex. Inhibition of TrkB kinase activity impairs autophagy in cervical motor neurons of young but not old mice. Measuring position sense.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1