美国不同人口、社会和行为特征的 HIV 感染者对 HIV 治疗的偏好模式。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1097/QAI.0000000000003509
Elizabeth S Russell, Mo Zhou, Yan Song, Narquis Barak, Yipeng Gao, T Christopher Mast
{"title":"美国不同人口、社会和行为特征的 HIV 感染者对 HIV 治疗的偏好模式。","authors":"Elizabeth S Russell, Mo Zhou, Yan Song, Narquis Barak, Yipeng Gao, T Christopher Mast","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New dosage form and frequency options may improve HIV treatment outcomes and reduce disparities in access and use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with HIV (PWH) in the US completed a demographic and discrete choice experiment survey of preference for 13 hypothetical HIV treatment options: daily and weekly oral tablets; 1-, 3-, or 6-monthly injections by self or a health care provider; yearly implant; or combinations. Best-worst scaling and a latent class model were used to analyze overall preference choices and for groups of individuals with similar patterns of preferences; the model also predicted uptake of products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the diverse 829 respondents, weekly oral tablets and 6-monthly injections by an HCP were significantly more favored than daily oral tablets. Convenience of the treatment and being tired of taking pills were the top drivers of preference responses. Latent class analysis identified four groups of respondents with distinct preference patterns; approximately two-thirds belonged to groups strongly preferring products other than daily oral tablets. The modelled uptake of a monthly pill, yearly implant, 6-monthly Health Care Provider (HCP) injection, oral daily pill, and 3-monthly HCP injection were 24%, 24%, 24%, 18%, and 11%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patterns of HIV medication preference can inform development of new forms of HIV therapy products as the majority of patients do not prefer the currently most available treatment option of daily oral tablets. Looking beyond population-level preferences and into similar groups of PWH increases the ability to develop patient-centered products to fill gaps in care and increase treatment effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of HIV treatment preferences among people with diverse demographic, social, and behavioral characteristics who are living with HIV in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth S Russell, Mo Zhou, Yan Song, Narquis Barak, Yipeng Gao, T Christopher Mast\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New dosage form and frequency options may improve HIV treatment outcomes and reduce disparities in access and use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with HIV (PWH) in the US completed a demographic and discrete choice experiment survey of preference for 13 hypothetical HIV treatment options: daily and weekly oral tablets; 1-, 3-, or 6-monthly injections by self or a health care provider; yearly implant; or combinations. Best-worst scaling and a latent class model were used to analyze overall preference choices and for groups of individuals with similar patterns of preferences; the model also predicted uptake of products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the diverse 829 respondents, weekly oral tablets and 6-monthly injections by an HCP were significantly more favored than daily oral tablets. Convenience of the treatment and being tired of taking pills were the top drivers of preference responses. Latent class analysis identified four groups of respondents with distinct preference patterns; approximately two-thirds belonged to groups strongly preferring products other than daily oral tablets. The modelled uptake of a monthly pill, yearly implant, 6-monthly Health Care Provider (HCP) injection, oral daily pill, and 3-monthly HCP injection were 24%, 24%, 24%, 18%, and 11%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patterns of HIV medication preference can inform development of new forms of HIV therapy products as the majority of patients do not prefer the currently most available treatment option of daily oral tablets. Looking beyond population-level preferences and into similar groups of PWH increases the ability to develop patient-centered products to fill gaps in care and increase treatment effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003509\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新的剂型和频率选择可能会改善 HIV 治疗效果,并减少获得和使用方面的差异:美国的艾滋病病毒感染者(PWH)完成了一项人口统计学和离散选择实验调查,调查了他们对 13 种假设的艾滋病治疗方案的偏好:每日和每周口服片剂;1、3 或 6 个月由自己或医疗保健提供者进行注射;每年植入;或组合。采用最佳-最差比例和潜类模型分析总体偏好选择和具有相似偏好模式的群体;该模型还预测了产品的使用情况:结果:在 829 位不同的受访者中,每周口服片剂和由保健医生每 6 个月注射一次的受访者明显多于每天口服片剂的受访者。治疗的便利性和厌倦服药是受访者首选的原因。潜类分析确定了四组具有不同偏好模式的受访者;约三分之二的受访者属于强烈偏好每日口服片剂以外的产品的群体。根据模型计算出的每月一次药片、每年一次植入、每6个月一次医护人员(HCP)注射、每天一次口服药片和每3个月一次医护人员注射的服用率分别为24%、24%、24%、18%和11%:艾滋病药物偏好模式可为开发新形式的艾滋病治疗产品提供信息,因为大多数患者并不偏好目前最常见的每日口服片剂治疗方案。跳出人群层面的偏好,对类似的艾滋病感染者群体进行研究,可以提高开发以患者为中心的产品的能力,从而填补医疗空白并提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of HIV treatment preferences among people with diverse demographic, social, and behavioral characteristics who are living with HIV in the United States.

Background: New dosage form and frequency options may improve HIV treatment outcomes and reduce disparities in access and use.

Methods: People with HIV (PWH) in the US completed a demographic and discrete choice experiment survey of preference for 13 hypothetical HIV treatment options: daily and weekly oral tablets; 1-, 3-, or 6-monthly injections by self or a health care provider; yearly implant; or combinations. Best-worst scaling and a latent class model were used to analyze overall preference choices and for groups of individuals with similar patterns of preferences; the model also predicted uptake of products.

Results: Among the diverse 829 respondents, weekly oral tablets and 6-monthly injections by an HCP were significantly more favored than daily oral tablets. Convenience of the treatment and being tired of taking pills were the top drivers of preference responses. Latent class analysis identified four groups of respondents with distinct preference patterns; approximately two-thirds belonged to groups strongly preferring products other than daily oral tablets. The modelled uptake of a monthly pill, yearly implant, 6-monthly Health Care Provider (HCP) injection, oral daily pill, and 3-monthly HCP injection were 24%, 24%, 24%, 18%, and 11%, respectively.

Conclusions: Patterns of HIV medication preference can inform development of new forms of HIV therapy products as the majority of patients do not prefer the currently most available treatment option of daily oral tablets. Looking beyond population-level preferences and into similar groups of PWH increases the ability to develop patient-centered products to fill gaps in care and increase treatment effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Injection Visit Adherence in Those Receiving Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine. Real-world comparative Analysis of Liposomal Doxorubicin versus Paclitaxel as First-Line Therapy for Kaposi Sarcoma. Immune Activation Is Associated With Neurocognitive Performance in Ugandan Adolescents Living With HIV. Beyond Viral Suppression-The Impact of Cumulative Violence on Health-Related Quality of Life Among a Cohort of Virally Suppressed Patients: Erratum. Brief Report: Alternative Pulmonary Function Measures of Emphysema in People With HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1