使用分层语音分析法进行组织干预是否能有效解决呼叫中心接线员的心理健康问题?随机对照试验。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Occupational Health Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1093/joccuh/uiae047
Naomichi Tani, Yoshihiro Takao, Sakihito Noro, Hiroaki Fujihara, Hisashi Eguchi, Kazuki Sakai, Takeshi Ebara
{"title":"使用分层语音分析法进行组织干预是否能有效解决呼叫中心接线员的心理健康问题?随机对照试验。","authors":"Naomichi Tani, Yoshihiro Takao, Sakihito Noro, Hiroaki Fujihara, Hisashi Eguchi, Kazuki Sakai, Takeshi Ebara","doi":"10.1093/joccuh/uiae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To verify the effects of organizational interventions on mental health using Layered Voice Analysis (LVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with call center operators. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 26), an LVA intervention group (n = 20), or a one-on-one intervention group (n = 20). The control group received general self-care information about preventing mental health problems from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan website. The organizational LVA intervention involved group sessions using participants' voice calls with customers, whereas the one-on-one intervention consisted of meetings or consultations with participants and their supervisors to discuss preventing mental health issues at work. To verify the effectiveness of the intervention program, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was administered 4 times (baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) as the primary outcome, and the data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. The intervention of LVA was subdivided and analyzed into LVA ≥5 times and LVA ≤4 times out of the total 6 interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, a significant CES-D reduction effect was observed at 8/12 weeks for the difference of coefficients (DOC; [βint - βctrl]) for the intervention of LVA ≥5 times (DOC -1.86 and -2.36, respectively). Similarly, even intervention LVA ≤4 times also showed a significant decrease of CES-D scores at 8/12 weeks (DOC -2.20 and -2.38, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An organizational intervention using LVA has the potential to reduce the risk of depression among call center operators.</p>","PeriodicalId":16632,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is organizational intervention using Layered Voice Analysis effective in addressing operator mental health in call centers? A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Naomichi Tani, Yoshihiro Takao, Sakihito Noro, Hiroaki Fujihara, Hisashi Eguchi, Kazuki Sakai, Takeshi Ebara\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joccuh/uiae047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To verify the effects of organizational interventions on mental health using Layered Voice Analysis (LVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 12-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with call center operators. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 26), an LVA intervention group (n = 20), or a one-on-one intervention group (n = 20). The control group received general self-care information about preventing mental health problems from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan website. The organizational LVA intervention involved group sessions using participants' voice calls with customers, whereas the one-on-one intervention consisted of meetings or consultations with participants and their supervisors to discuss preventing mental health issues at work. To verify the effectiveness of the intervention program, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was administered 4 times (baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) as the primary outcome, and the data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. The intervention of LVA was subdivided and analyzed into LVA ≥5 times and LVA ≤4 times out of the total 6 interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, a significant CES-D reduction effect was observed at 8/12 weeks for the difference of coefficients (DOC; [βint - βctrl]) for the intervention of LVA ≥5 times (DOC -1.86 and -2.36, respectively). Similarly, even intervention LVA ≤4 times also showed a significant decrease of CES-D scores at 8/12 weeks (DOC -2.20 and -2.38, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An organizational intervention using LVA has the potential to reduce the risk of depression among call center operators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joccuh/uiae047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用分层语音分析法(LVA)验证组织干预措施对心理健康的影响:使用分层语音分析法(LVA)验证组织干预对心理健康的影响:对呼叫中心接线员进行了为期 12 周的单盲随机对照试验。66 名参与者被随机分配到对照组(26 人)、LVA 干预组(20 人)或一对一干预组(20 人)。对照组从日本厚生劳动省的网站上获取有关心理健康预防的一般自我保健信息。组织 LVA 干预包括利用参与者与客户的语音通话进行小组会议,而一对一干预则包括与参与者及其主管进行会议或协商,讨论如何预防工作中的心理健康问题。为了验证干预计划的有效性,我们对流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行了四次施测(基线、4 周、8 周和 12 周),作为主要结果,并使用线性混合模型对数据进行了分析。在总共六次干预中,将LVA干预细分为LVA≥5次和LVA≤4次进行分析:与对照组相比,LVA ≥5次干预的系数差(DOC [βint - βctrl])在8/12周时观察到显著的CES-D降低效果(DOC分别为-1.86和-2.36)。同样,即使干预LVA≤4次,8/12周时CES-D得分也有显著下降(DOC分别为-2.20和-2.38):使用 LVA 进行组织干预有可能降低呼叫中心操作员患抑郁症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is organizational intervention using Layered Voice Analysis effective in addressing operator mental health in call centers? A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To verify the effects of organizational interventions on mental health using Layered Voice Analysis (LVA).

Methods: A 12-week single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with call center operators. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 26), an LVA intervention group (n = 20), or a one-on-one intervention group (n = 20). The control group received general self-care information about preventing mental health problems from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan website. The organizational LVA intervention involved group sessions using participants' voice calls with customers, whereas the one-on-one intervention consisted of meetings or consultations with participants and their supervisors to discuss preventing mental health issues at work. To verify the effectiveness of the intervention program, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was administered 4 times (baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks) as the primary outcome, and the data were analyzed using a linear mixed model. The intervention of LVA was subdivided and analyzed into LVA ≥5 times and LVA ≤4 times out of the total 6 interventions.

Results: Compared with the control group, a significant CES-D reduction effect was observed at 8/12 weeks for the difference of coefficients (DOC; [βint - βctrl]) for the intervention of LVA ≥5 times (DOC -1.86 and -2.36, respectively). Similarly, even intervention LVA ≤4 times also showed a significant decrease of CES-D scores at 8/12 weeks (DOC -2.20 and -2.38, respectively).

Conclusions: An organizational intervention using LVA has the potential to reduce the risk of depression among call center operators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Health
Journal of Occupational Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal is broad, covering toxicology, ergonomics, psychosocial factors and other relevant health issues of workers, with special emphasis on the current developments in occupational health. The JOH also accepts various methodologies that are relevant to investigation of occupational health risk factors and exposures, such as large-scale epidemiological studies, human studies employing biological techniques and fundamental experiments on animals, and also welcomes submissions concerning occupational health practices and related issues.
期刊最新文献
The impact of overseas assignments on metabolic factors: Panasonic cohort study 23. Associations of physical activity and sedentary time with psychological distress among Japan self-defense forces personnel dispatched overseas: a prospective cohort study. Association between physical activity patterns of working-age adults and social jetlag, depressive symptoms, and presenteeism. Are there compensatory behaviors in response to a sit-stand desk intervention? Comment on "Occupational Health Staff's Involvement Contributes to Supervisor's Perceived Organizational Support in Japanese Workforce: A Prospective Cohort Study".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1