纳他珠单抗治疗的小儿多发性硬化症患者 NEDA 高而 PIRA 低。

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200303
Marco Puthenparampil, Marta Gaggiola, Marta Ponzano, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Margherita Nosadini, Alessandro Di Paola, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Francesca Bovis, Paolo Gallo
{"title":"纳他珠单抗治疗的小儿多发性硬化症患者 NEDA 高而 PIRA 低。","authors":"Marco Puthenparampil, Marta Gaggiola, Marta Ponzano, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Margherita Nosadini, Alessandro Di Paola, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Francesca Bovis, Paolo Gallo","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by a more rapid accumulation of CNS inflammation than adult-onset MS (AOMS), the therapeutic algorithms applied in POMS are usually based on AOMS therapeutic outcomes. To define a high-efficacy treatment (HET)-based strategy to treat POMS, we designed an observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS and AOMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Starting from 160 patients, we applied a 2:1 (adult:pediatric) matching on propensity scores and obtained 32 patients with NTZ-treated POMS and 64 with AOMS, estimated from a multivariable logistic regression model. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up every 6 months for a mean period of 46.0 ± 26.9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following re-baseline at month 6, no difference (log-rank test: <i>p</i> = 0.924) in new and enlarging T2 white matter lesions, postcontrast T1 lesions, and relapse rate were observed between POMS and AOMS throughout the study. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) was never observed in POMS, while 9 of 64 patients with AOMS (12.5%) had PIRA events during the follow-up (40.0 ± 25.9 months; log-rank <i>p</i> value 0.0156). JCV seroconversion rate during NTZ infusion did not differ between POMS and AOMS (log-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.3231). Finally, no serious adverse event was observed in both POMS and AOMS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The favorable outcomes observed on clinical, especially in PIRA, and radiologic parameters strongly support the use of NTZ as a first-choice HET in POMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"11 5","pages":"e200303"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High NEDA and No PIRA in Natalizumab-Treated Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Puthenparampil, Marta Gaggiola, Marta Ponzano, Giovanni Zanotelli, Alessandro Miscioscia, Margherita Nosadini, Alessandro Di Paola, Stefano Sartori, Paola Perini, Francesca Rinaldi, Francesca Bovis, Paolo Gallo\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by a more rapid accumulation of CNS inflammation than adult-onset MS (AOMS), the therapeutic algorithms applied in POMS are usually based on AOMS therapeutic outcomes. To define a high-efficacy treatment (HET)-based strategy to treat POMS, we designed an observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS and AOMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Starting from 160 patients, we applied a 2:1 (adult:pediatric) matching on propensity scores and obtained 32 patients with NTZ-treated POMS and 64 with AOMS, estimated from a multivariable logistic regression model. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up every 6 months for a mean period of 46.0 ± 26.9 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following re-baseline at month 6, no difference (log-rank test: <i>p</i> = 0.924) in new and enlarging T2 white matter lesions, postcontrast T1 lesions, and relapse rate were observed between POMS and AOMS throughout the study. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) was never observed in POMS, while 9 of 64 patients with AOMS (12.5%) had PIRA events during the follow-up (40.0 ± 25.9 months; log-rank <i>p</i> value 0.0156). JCV seroconversion rate during NTZ infusion did not differ between POMS and AOMS (log-rank test <i>p</i> = 0.3231). Finally, no serious adverse event was observed in both POMS and AOMS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The favorable outcomes observed on clinical, especially in PIRA, and radiologic parameters strongly support the use of NTZ as a first-choice HET in POMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e200303\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11379434/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200303\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200303","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:尽管小儿多发性硬化症(POMS)的特点是中枢神经系统炎症的积累比成人多发性硬化症(AOMS)更快,但应用于POMS的治疗算法通常基于AOMS的治疗结果。为了确定基于高疗效治疗(HET)的POMS治疗策略,我们设计了一项观察性回顾研究,旨在评估纳他珠单抗(NTZ)在新发POMS和AOMS中的疗效和安全性:从160名患者开始,我们根据倾向评分进行了2:1(成人:儿童)匹配,根据多变量逻辑回归模型估算,获得了32名经NTZ治疗的POMS患者和64名AOMS患者。所有患者每6个月接受一次临床和放射学随访,平均随访时间为(46.0 ± 26.9)个月:结果:在第6个月重新设定基线后,POMS和AOMS在新发和扩大的T2白质病变、对比后T1病变和复发率方面没有差异(对数秩检验:P = 0.924)。在 POMS 患者中从未观察到独立于复发活动的进展(PIRA),而在 64 名 AOMS 患者中,有 9 人(12.5%)在随访期间(40.0 ± 25.9 个月;log-rank p 值为 0.0156)出现了 PIRA 事件。输注 NTZ 期间的 JCV 血清转换率在 POMS 和 AOMS 之间没有差异(对数秩检验 p = 0.3231)。最后,POMS 和 AOMS 均未观察到严重不良事件:讨论:在临床(尤其是 PIRA)和放射学参数方面观察到的良好结果有力地支持了将 NTZ 作为 POMS 的首选 HET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High NEDA and No PIRA in Natalizumab-Treated Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and objectives: Although pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is characterized by a more rapid accumulation of CNS inflammation than adult-onset MS (AOMS), the therapeutic algorithms applied in POMS are usually based on AOMS therapeutic outcomes. To define a high-efficacy treatment (HET)-based strategy to treat POMS, we designed an observational retrospective study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (NTZ) in naïve POMS and AOMS.

Methods: Starting from 160 patients, we applied a 2:1 (adult:pediatric) matching on propensity scores and obtained 32 patients with NTZ-treated POMS and 64 with AOMS, estimated from a multivariable logistic regression model. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up every 6 months for a mean period of 46.0 ± 26.9 months.

Results: Following re-baseline at month 6, no difference (log-rank test: p = 0.924) in new and enlarging T2 white matter lesions, postcontrast T1 lesions, and relapse rate were observed between POMS and AOMS throughout the study. Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) was never observed in POMS, while 9 of 64 patients with AOMS (12.5%) had PIRA events during the follow-up (40.0 ± 25.9 months; log-rank p value 0.0156). JCV seroconversion rate during NTZ infusion did not differ between POMS and AOMS (log-rank test p = 0.3231). Finally, no serious adverse event was observed in both POMS and AOMS.

Discussion: The favorable outcomes observed on clinical, especially in PIRA, and radiologic parameters strongly support the use of NTZ as a first-choice HET in POMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
"Lupus Myelitis" Revisited: A Retrospective Single-Center Study of Myelitis Associated With Rheumatologic Disease. Missing Full Disclosures. Obesity Affects Disease Activity and Progression, Cognitive Functioning, and Quality of Life in People With Multiple Sclerosis. Proteomic Profiling and Pathophysiological Implications in Multiple Sclerosis. Proteomics Reveals Age as Major Modifier of Inflammatory CSF Signatures in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1