增强视觉评估[视觉检查]对宫颈癌筛查阳性妇女分诊的诊断效果。

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Mid-life Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.4103/jmh.jmh_204_23
Saritha Shamsunder, Archana Mishra, Anita Kumar, Rajni Beriwal, Charanjeet Ahluwalia, Sujata Das
{"title":"增强视觉评估[视觉检查]对宫颈癌筛查阳性妇女分诊的诊断效果。","authors":"Saritha Shamsunder, Archana Mishra, Anita Kumar, Rajni Beriwal, Charanjeet Ahluwalia, Sujata Das","doi":"10.4103/jmh.jmh_204_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colposcopy is important for triaging any abnormal cervical screening test. Scarcity of trained colposcopists and colposcopy centers is a big hurdle to screening programs in low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Objectives of the study: </strong>The objective was to assess the performance of the artificial intelligence incorporated into the mobile optical device technologies (ODT) Enhanced Visual Assessment (EVA visual check) against physician colposcopic diagnosis and the gold standard of histopathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>It was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on women referred to a colposcopy clinic following an abnormal screening test. Colposcopic examination was performed by colposcopists using the MobileODT EVA system. Physician's impression and Visual Check analysis were compared with the final histopathological analysis or cytology. Cases with normal cytology and normal colposcopy did not undergo biopsy, and these were considered normal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2050 women were screened, and 147 screen-positive women were recruited in the study. EVA Visual Check had a sensitivity of 86.8% (75-95), specificity of 28.7% (20-39), positive predictive value (PPV) of 40.7% (32-50), negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.4% (62-91), and diagnostic accuracy of 49.7% (41-58) for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1+ lesions. EVA Visual Check has a sensitivity of 89.3% (72-98), specificity of 26.1% (18-35), PPV of 22.1% (15-31), NPV of 91.2% (76-98), and diagnostic accuracy of 38.1% (30-46) for CIN 2+ lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MobileODT EVA colposcope with AI has sensitivity comparable to physician's diagnosis, whereas specificity, PPV, and NPV were less than that of physician's diagnosis. It could prove valuable for triage of screen-positive women for further management.</p>","PeriodicalId":37717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mid-life Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Efficacy of Enhanced Visual Assessment [Visual Check] for Triaging Cervical Cancer Screen Positive Women.\",\"authors\":\"Saritha Shamsunder, Archana Mishra, Anita Kumar, Rajni Beriwal, Charanjeet Ahluwalia, Sujata Das\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmh.jmh_204_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Colposcopy is important for triaging any abnormal cervical screening test. Scarcity of trained colposcopists and colposcopy centers is a big hurdle to screening programs in low- and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Objectives of the study: </strong>The objective was to assess the performance of the artificial intelligence incorporated into the mobile optical device technologies (ODT) Enhanced Visual Assessment (EVA visual check) against physician colposcopic diagnosis and the gold standard of histopathology.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>It was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on women referred to a colposcopy clinic following an abnormal screening test. Colposcopic examination was performed by colposcopists using the MobileODT EVA system. Physician's impression and Visual Check analysis were compared with the final histopathological analysis or cytology. Cases with normal cytology and normal colposcopy did not undergo biopsy, and these were considered normal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2050 women were screened, and 147 screen-positive women were recruited in the study. EVA Visual Check had a sensitivity of 86.8% (75-95), specificity of 28.7% (20-39), positive predictive value (PPV) of 40.7% (32-50), negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.4% (62-91), and diagnostic accuracy of 49.7% (41-58) for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1+ lesions. EVA Visual Check has a sensitivity of 89.3% (72-98), specificity of 26.1% (18-35), PPV of 22.1% (15-31), NPV of 91.2% (76-98), and diagnostic accuracy of 38.1% (30-46) for CIN 2+ lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MobileODT EVA colposcope with AI has sensitivity comparable to physician's diagnosis, whereas specificity, PPV, and NPV were less than that of physician's diagnosis. It could prove valuable for triage of screen-positive women for further management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mid-life Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mid-life Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_204_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mid-life Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmh.jmh_204_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:阴道镜检查对于宫颈筛查异常情况的分流非常重要。缺乏训练有素的阴道镜医生和阴道镜检查中心是中低收入国家筛查项目的一大障碍:研究目的:评估移动光学设备技术(ODT)中的人工智能增强视觉评估(EVA 视觉检查)与医生阴道镜诊断和组织病理学金标准的性能:这是一项横断面观察研究,研究对象是筛查异常后转诊到阴道镜诊所的妇女。阴道镜检查由阴道镜医师使用 MobileODT EVA 系统进行。医生的印象和视觉检查分析与最终的组织病理学分析或细胞学结果进行了比较。细胞学检查和阴道镜检查均正常的病例不进行活组织检查,这些病例被视为正常病例:共有 2050 名妇女接受了筛查,其中 147 名筛查阳性妇女被纳入研究。EVA Visual Check 诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)1+病变的灵敏度为 86.8%(75-95),特异性为 28.7%(20-39),阳性预测值(PPV)为 40.7%(32-50),阴性预测值(NPV)为 79.4%(62-91),诊断准确率为 49.7%(41-58)。EVA Visual Check 对 CIN 2+ 病变的敏感性为 89.3%(72-98),特异性为 26.1%(18-35),PPV 为 22.1%(15-31),NPV 为 91.2%(76-98),诊断准确性为 38.1%(30-46):结论:带有人工智能的移动 ODT EVA 阴道镜的灵敏度与医生诊断相当,但特异性、PPV 和 NPV 均低于医生诊断。事实证明,它对筛查阳性妇女的分流和进一步治疗很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Efficacy of Enhanced Visual Assessment [Visual Check] for Triaging Cervical Cancer Screen Positive Women.

Introduction: Colposcopy is important for triaging any abnormal cervical screening test. Scarcity of trained colposcopists and colposcopy centers is a big hurdle to screening programs in low- and middle-income countries.

Objectives of the study: The objective was to assess the performance of the artificial intelligence incorporated into the mobile optical device technologies (ODT) Enhanced Visual Assessment (EVA visual check) against physician colposcopic diagnosis and the gold standard of histopathology.

Materials and methods: It was a cross-sectional observational study conducted on women referred to a colposcopy clinic following an abnormal screening test. Colposcopic examination was performed by colposcopists using the MobileODT EVA system. Physician's impression and Visual Check analysis were compared with the final histopathological analysis or cytology. Cases with normal cytology and normal colposcopy did not undergo biopsy, and these were considered normal.

Results: A total of 2050 women were screened, and 147 screen-positive women were recruited in the study. EVA Visual Check had a sensitivity of 86.8% (75-95), specificity of 28.7% (20-39), positive predictive value (PPV) of 40.7% (32-50), negative predictive value (NPV) of 79.4% (62-91), and diagnostic accuracy of 49.7% (41-58) for diagnosing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1+ lesions. EVA Visual Check has a sensitivity of 89.3% (72-98), specificity of 26.1% (18-35), PPV of 22.1% (15-31), NPV of 91.2% (76-98), and diagnostic accuracy of 38.1% (30-46) for CIN 2+ lesions.

Conclusion: MobileODT EVA colposcope with AI has sensitivity comparable to physician's diagnosis, whereas specificity, PPV, and NPV were less than that of physician's diagnosis. It could prove valuable for triage of screen-positive women for further management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mid-life Health
Journal of Mid-life Health Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
43 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of mid-life health is the official journal of the Indian Menopause society published Quarterly in January, April, July and October. It is peer reviewed, scientific journal of mid-life health and its problems. It includes all aspects of mid-life health, preventive as well as curative. The journal publishes on subjects such as gynecology, neurology, geriatrics, psychiatry, endocrinology, urology, andrology, psychology, healthy ageing, cardiovascular health, bone health, quality of life etc. as relevant of men and women in their midlife. The Journal provides a visible platform to the researchers as well as clinicians to publish their experiences in this area thereby helping in the promotion of mid-life health leading to healthy ageing, growing need due to increasing life expectancy. The Editorial team has maintained high standards and published original research papers, case reports and review articles from the best of the best contributors both national & international, consistently so that now, it has become a great tool in the hands of menopause practitioners.
期刊最新文献
A Diagnosis of Sheehan's Syndrome: Better Late Than Never. Angiolipoleiomyoma of the Uterus with a Dermoid Cyst in the Right Ovary: An Unusual Association. Balance Problems in the Elderly with Diabetes Mellitus: A Literature Review. Carcinoma Endometrium Coexisting in Huge Procidentia. Clinical Validation of Calf Circumference with DEXA Scans as a Measure of Muscle Mass to Assess Sarcopenia in Community Settings in Indian Postmenopausal Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1