在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用远程医疗:安全网环境中初级保健临床医生的观点。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1
Amelie Foumena Nkodo, Martha M Gonzalez, Sarah Reves, Rebecca S Etz
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间采用远程医疗:安全网环境中初级保健临床医生的观点。","authors":"Amelie Foumena Nkodo, Martha M Gonzalez, Sarah Reves, Rebecca S Etz","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to describe the facilitators and barriers of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic for primary care clinicians in safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 5 surveys fielded between September 2020 and March 2023 from the national \"Quick COVID-19 Primary Care Survey\" by the Larry A. Green Center, with the Primary Care Collaborative. We used an explanatory sequential mixed method approach. We compared safety-net practices (free & charitable organization, federally qualified health center (FQHC), clinics with a 50% or greater Medicaid) to all other settings. We discuss: 1) telemedicine services provided; 2) clinician motivations; 3) and telemedicine access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinicians were similarly motivated to implement telemedicine. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to report use of phone visits. These clinicians felt less \"confident in my use of telemedicine\" (covariate-adjusted OR = 0.611, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.87) and were more likely to report struggles with televisits in March 2023 (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.57), particularly with physical examinations. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to endorse reductions in no-shows (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 - 2.68). Telemedicine increased access and new patient-facing demands including portal communications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enhances our understanding of the use of telemedicine within the safety-net setting. Clinician perceptions are important for identifying barriers to telemedicine following the end of the Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Clinicians highlighted significant limitations to its use including clinical appropriateness, quality of physical examinations, and added patient-facing workload.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"37 3","pages":"409-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine Adoption During COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from Primary Care Clinicians in Safety-Net Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Amelie Foumena Nkodo, Martha M Gonzalez, Sarah Reves, Rebecca S Etz\",\"doi\":\"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to describe the facilitators and barriers of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic for primary care clinicians in safety-net settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 5 surveys fielded between September 2020 and March 2023 from the national \\\"Quick COVID-19 Primary Care Survey\\\" by the Larry A. Green Center, with the Primary Care Collaborative. We used an explanatory sequential mixed method approach. We compared safety-net practices (free & charitable organization, federally qualified health center (FQHC), clinics with a 50% or greater Medicaid) to all other settings. We discuss: 1) telemedicine services provided; 2) clinician motivations; 3) and telemedicine access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinicians were similarly motivated to implement telemedicine. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to report use of phone visits. These clinicians felt less \\\"confident in my use of telemedicine\\\" (covariate-adjusted OR = 0.611, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.87) and were more likely to report struggles with televisits in March 2023 (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.57), particularly with physical examinations. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to endorse reductions in no-shows (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 - 2.68). Telemedicine increased access and new patient-facing demands including portal communications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study enhances our understanding of the use of telemedicine within the safety-net setting. Clinician perceptions are important for identifying barriers to telemedicine following the end of the Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Clinicians highlighted significant limitations to its use including clinical appropriateness, quality of physical examinations, and added patient-facing workload.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"409-417\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230339R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间,安全网环境中的初级保健临床医生使用远程医疗的促进因素和障碍:我们从 Larry A. Green 中心与初级医疗合作组织共同开展的全国 "COVID-19 初级医疗快速调查 "中选取了 2020 年 9 月至 2023 年 3 月间进行的 5 项调查。我们采用了解释性顺序混合方法。我们将安全网实践(免费和慈善组织、联邦合格医疗中心 (FQHC)、医疗补助比例为 50% 或以上的诊所)与所有其他环境进行了比较。我们讨论了1) 提供的远程医疗服务;2) 临床医生的动机;3) 远程医疗的可及性:结果:所有临床医生实施远程医疗的动机相似。安全网临床医生更倾向于使用电话访问。这些临床医生对 "我使用远程医疗的信心 "较弱(经协变量调整的 OR = 0.611,95% CI 0.43 - 0.87),并且更有可能在 2023 年 3 月报告与电视访问的斗争(经协变量调整的 OR = 1.73,95% CI 1.16 - 2.57),尤其是在体格检查方面。安全网临床医生更有可能赞同减少不就诊率(协变量调整 OR = 1.77,95% CI 1.17 - 2.68)。远程医疗增加了患者的就医机会和新的面向患者的需求,包括门户网站通信:这项研究加深了我们对在安全网环境中使用远程医疗的理解。临床医生的看法对于确定联邦 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急状况结束后远程医疗的障碍非常重要。临床医生强调了使用远程医疗的重大局限性,包括临床适宜性、体检质量以及增加面对患者的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedicine Adoption During COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from Primary Care Clinicians in Safety-Net Settings.

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe the facilitators and barriers of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic for primary care clinicians in safety-net settings.

Methods: We selected 5 surveys fielded between September 2020 and March 2023 from the national "Quick COVID-19 Primary Care Survey" by the Larry A. Green Center, with the Primary Care Collaborative. We used an explanatory sequential mixed method approach. We compared safety-net practices (free & charitable organization, federally qualified health center (FQHC), clinics with a 50% or greater Medicaid) to all other settings. We discuss: 1) telemedicine services provided; 2) clinician motivations; 3) and telemedicine access.

Results: All clinicians were similarly motivated to implement telemedicine. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to report use of phone visits. These clinicians felt less "confident in my use of telemedicine" (covariate-adjusted OR = 0.611, 95% CI 0.43 - 0.87) and were more likely to report struggles with televisits in March 2023 (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.16 - 2.57), particularly with physical examinations. Safety-net clinicians were more likely to endorse reductions in no-shows (covariate-adjusted OR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.17 - 2.68). Telemedicine increased access and new patient-facing demands including portal communications.

Conclusions: This study enhances our understanding of the use of telemedicine within the safety-net setting. Clinician perceptions are important for identifying barriers to telemedicine following the end of the Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Clinicians highlighted significant limitations to its use including clinical appropriateness, quality of physical examinations, and added patient-facing workload.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1