未显示状态的预测因素:对美国一家学术性眼科医院小儿眼科患者的分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3928/01913913-20240718-02
Rucha K Borkhetaria, Zain S Hussain, Vanna Giang, Amanda L Ely
{"title":"未显示状态的预测因素:对美国一家学术性眼科医院小儿眼科患者的分析。","authors":"Rucha K Borkhetaria, Zain S Hussain, Vanna Giang, Amanda L Ely","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20240718-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify pediatric patient and appointment characteristics associated with no-show status at a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology clinic within a U.S. academic ophthalmology department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was performed for all pediatric patients with a scheduled ophthalmology appointment at the Penn State Eye Center between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed associations between appointment nonattendance and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8,083 scheduled visits, 1,445 (17.9%) were no-shows. Factors associated with no-show status included appointment type (new vs return odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.63, <i>P</i> < .001); lower median household income (< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, <i>P</i> < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, <i>P</i> < .001); non-private insurance (self-pay vs private: OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, <i>P</i> < .001, Medicaid vs private: OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 2.32 to 3.16, <i>P</i> < .001); commute distance 10 to 30 miles vs < 5 miles (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.99, <i>P</i> = .008); race: unavailable vs White (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.85, <i>P</i> < .001), Black vs White (OR: 1.86, 95% CI:1.53 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001), Other vs White (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.70, <i>P</i> < .001); ethnicity: Hispanic vs non-Hispanic (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001); and language preference: Spanish vs English (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.32, <i>P</i> < .001), Nepali vs English (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.43, <i>P</i> = .027), other vs English (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.49, <i>P</i> < .001). Appointment reminders (phone call, <i>P</i> = .013); text message, <i>P</i> < .001; other, <i>P</i> = .013) all resulted in a greater propensity to show, but email communication alone did not (<i>P</i> = .674).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Certain patient and appointment characteristics that are linked to a higher rate of no-show status can inform targeted initiatives to improve health care outcomes, resource utilization, and clinical efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology community. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 20XX;X(XX):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of No-Show Status: An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Patients at an Academic Ophthalmology Department in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Rucha K Borkhetaria, Zain S Hussain, Vanna Giang, Amanda L Ely\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01913913-20240718-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify pediatric patient and appointment characteristics associated with no-show status at a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology clinic within a U.S. academic ophthalmology department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was performed for all pediatric patients with a scheduled ophthalmology appointment at the Penn State Eye Center between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed associations between appointment nonattendance and patient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 8,083 scheduled visits, 1,445 (17.9%) were no-shows. Factors associated with no-show status included appointment type (new vs return odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.63, <i>P</i> < .001); lower median household income (< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, <i>P</i> < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, <i>P</i> < .001); non-private insurance (self-pay vs private: OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, <i>P</i> < .001, Medicaid vs private: OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 2.32 to 3.16, <i>P</i> < .001); commute distance 10 to 30 miles vs < 5 miles (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.99, <i>P</i> = .008); race: unavailable vs White (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.85, <i>P</i> < .001), Black vs White (OR: 1.86, 95% CI:1.53 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001), Other vs White (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.70, <i>P</i> < .001); ethnicity: Hispanic vs non-Hispanic (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.27, <i>P</i> < .001); and language preference: Spanish vs English (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.32, <i>P</i> < .001), Nepali vs English (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.43, <i>P</i> = .027), other vs English (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.49, <i>P</i> < .001). Appointment reminders (phone call, <i>P</i> = .013); text message, <i>P</i> < .001; other, <i>P</i> = .013) all resulted in a greater propensity to show, but email communication alone did not (<i>P</i> = .674).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Certain patient and appointment characteristics that are linked to a higher rate of no-show status can inform targeted initiatives to improve health care outcomes, resource utilization, and clinical efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology community. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 20XX;X(XX):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240718-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240718-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在美国眼科学术部门的一家三级医疗机构的儿科眼科诊所中,确定与未就诊状态相关的儿科患者和预约特征:对 2022 年 4 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 31 日期间在宾夕法尼亚州立大学眼科中心预约眼科门诊的所有儿科患者进行了横断面回顾性病历审查。多变量逻辑回归分析评估了未赴约与患者特征之间的关联:在8083次预约就诊中,有1445次(17.9%)未到诊。与未赴约状态相关的因素包括预约类型(新预约与复诊的几率比 [OR]:1.43,95% CI:1.26 至 1.63,P < .001);较低的家庭收入中位数(< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR:1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, P < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, P < .001); 非私人保险(自费 vs 私人:OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, P < .001, Medicaid vs private. OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, P < .001:OR:2.17,95% CI:2.32 至 3.16,P < .001);通勤距离 10 至 30 英里 vs < 5 英里(OR:1.49,95% CI:1.11 至 1.99,P = .008);种族:不详 vs 白人(OR:2.18,95% CI:1.66 至 2.85,P < .001),黑人 vs 白人(OR:1.86,95% CI:1.53 至 2.27,P < .001),其他 vs 白人(OR:1.47,95% CI:1.27 至 1.70,P < .001);种族:西班牙裔 vs 非西班牙裔(OR:1.92,95% CI:1.62 至 2.27,P <.001);语言偏好:西班牙语 vs 英语(OR:1.86,95% CI:1.49 至 2.32,P < .001),尼泊尔语 vs 英语(OR:1.60,95% CI:1.06 至 2.43,P = .027),其他语言 vs 英语(OR:1.83,95% CI:1.35 至 2.49,P < .001)。预约提醒(电话,P = .013;短信,P < .001;其他,P = .013)都会导致更高的显示倾向,但仅靠电子邮件沟通则不会(P = .674):结论:某些患者和预约特征与较高的缺席率有关,这些特征可以为改善儿科眼科界的医疗效果、资源利用率和临床效率提供有针对性的信息。[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of No-Show Status: An Analysis of Pediatric Ophthalmology Patients at an Academic Ophthalmology Department in the United States.

Purpose: To identify pediatric patient and appointment characteristics associated with no-show status at a tertiary care pediatric ophthalmology clinic within a U.S. academic ophthalmology department.

Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective chart review was performed for all pediatric patients with a scheduled ophthalmology appointment at the Penn State Eye Center between April 1, 2022 and March 31, 2023. A multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed associations between appointment nonattendance and patient characteristics.

Results: Of 8,083 scheduled visits, 1,445 (17.9%) were no-shows. Factors associated with no-show status included appointment type (new vs return odds ratio [OR]: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.63, P < .001); lower median household income (< $41,374 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.55, P < .001; $41,374 to $68,957 vs > $68,957 OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.44, P < .001); non-private insurance (self-pay vs private: OR: 5.65, 95% CI: 3.87 to 8.24, P < .001, Medicaid vs private: OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 2.32 to 3.16, P < .001); commute distance 10 to 30 miles vs < 5 miles (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.99, P = .008); race: unavailable vs White (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66 to 2.85, P < .001), Black vs White (OR: 1.86, 95% CI:1.53 to 2.27, P < .001), Other vs White (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.27 to 1.70, P < .001); ethnicity: Hispanic vs non-Hispanic (OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.27, P < .001); and language preference: Spanish vs English (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.32, P < .001), Nepali vs English (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.43, P = .027), other vs English (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.49, P < .001). Appointment reminders (phone call, P = .013); text message, P < .001; other, P = .013) all resulted in a greater propensity to show, but email communication alone did not (P = .674).

Conclusions: Certain patient and appointment characteristics that are linked to a higher rate of no-show status can inform targeted initiatives to improve health care outcomes, resource utilization, and clinical efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology community. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(XX):XXX-XXX.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
期刊最新文献
Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Horizontal Nystagmus: Effect on the Frequency of the Oscillation on a Pediatric Population. Incidence, Risk Factors and Development of Retinopathy of Prematurity in Mid-Preterm and Late-Preterm Infants. Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria. Long-term Ocular Alignment and Sensory Outcomes After Medial Rectus Recession for High AC/A Ratio Esotropia. Long-term, Low-Dose Oral Azithromycin Treatment for Chronic Severe Bilateral Blepharokeratoconjunctivitis in Pediatric Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1