探索实施环境、社会和治理活动的管理意图:UTAUT2框架中促进条件的作用

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Regional Science Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100126
Edin Hrnjica , Ljiljan Veselinovic, Merima Cinjarevic
{"title":"探索实施环境、社会和治理活动的管理意图:UTAUT2框架中促进条件的作用","authors":"Edin Hrnjica ,&nbsp;Ljiljan Veselinovic,&nbsp;Merima Cinjarevic","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research investigates the factors influencing managers' willingness to adopt Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) practices in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. As these practices are becoming increasingly important, it is crucial to understand what factors can increase managers' acceptance of them for both theory and practice. Our analysis was conducted on a sample of 306 managers from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Anchored in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), we tested three models to identify predictors of intention to adopt ESG practices and to explore the moderating role of facilitating conditions (FC) on the relationship between performance expectancy and intention to adopt ESG practices. Our findings indicate that there are consistent factors that predict the managers’ intention of adopt ESG practices, including Performance Expectancy (PE), Social Influence (SI), and Habitual Tendency (HT). We found that the FC negatively moderate the link between PE and intention to adopt social and governance practices within ESG framework. We argue that the nature of each domain within ESG, ceiling effect, and resource constraints and trade-offs might be possible explanations for these results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 100126"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003378/pdfft?md5=2ba04c17f23ca8bac20b1defbe984a9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003378-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring managerial intentions to implement ESG Activities: The role of facilitating conditions in the UTAUT2 framework\",\"authors\":\"Edin Hrnjica ,&nbsp;Ljiljan Veselinovic,&nbsp;Merima Cinjarevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research investigates the factors influencing managers' willingness to adopt Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) practices in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. As these practices are becoming increasingly important, it is crucial to understand what factors can increase managers' acceptance of them for both theory and practice. Our analysis was conducted on a sample of 306 managers from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Anchored in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), we tested three models to identify predictors of intention to adopt ESG practices and to explore the moderating role of facilitating conditions (FC) on the relationship between performance expectancy and intention to adopt ESG practices. Our findings indicate that there are consistent factors that predict the managers’ intention of adopt ESG practices, including Performance Expectancy (PE), Social Influence (SI), and Habitual Tendency (HT). We found that the FC negatively moderate the link between PE and intention to adopt social and governance practices within ESG framework. We argue that the nature of each domain within ESG, ceiling effect, and resource constraints and trade-offs might be possible explanations for these results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003378/pdfft?md5=2ba04c17f23ca8bac20b1defbe984a9e&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003378-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Science Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了影响波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那中小型企业(SMEs)管理人员采用环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)实践意愿的因素。随着这些实践变得越来越重要,了解哪些因素可以提高经理们对这些实践的接受程度,对于理论和实践都至关重要。我们对来自波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的 306 名管理人员进行了分析。以 "技术接受和使用统一理论 2"(UTAUT2)为基础,我们测试了三个模型,以确定采用环境、社会和公司治理做法的意向预测因素,并探索促进条件(FC)对绩效预期与采用环境、社会和公司治理做法的意向之间关系的调节作用。研究结果表明,绩效预期(PE)、社会影响(SI)和习惯倾向(HT)是预测管理者采用环境、社会和治理实践意向的一致因素。我们发现,在 ESG 框架内,FC 负向调节 PE 与采用社会和治理实践的意向之间的联系。我们认为,ESG 中各领域的性质、天花板效应以及资源限制和权衡可能是这些结果的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring managerial intentions to implement ESG Activities: The role of facilitating conditions in the UTAUT2 framework

This research investigates the factors influencing managers' willingness to adopt Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) practices in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. As these practices are becoming increasingly important, it is crucial to understand what factors can increase managers' acceptance of them for both theory and practice. Our analysis was conducted on a sample of 306 managers from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Anchored in the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2), we tested three models to identify predictors of intention to adopt ESG practices and to explore the moderating role of facilitating conditions (FC) on the relationship between performance expectancy and intention to adopt ESG practices. Our findings indicate that there are consistent factors that predict the managers’ intention of adopt ESG practices, including Performance Expectancy (PE), Social Influence (SI), and Habitual Tendency (HT). We found that the FC negatively moderate the link between PE and intention to adopt social and governance practices within ESG framework. We argue that the nature of each domain within ESG, ceiling effect, and resource constraints and trade-offs might be possible explanations for these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of speed limits on labour sheds in the mountain west United States Regional planning: A failed or flawed project for Africa? Taking advantage of big data science on the horizon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1