产后会阴疼痛及其与二级裂伤和会阴创伤的关系--随机对照试验的后续研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1111/aogs.14938
Malin Edqvist, Gunilla Ajne, Pia Teleman, Gunilla Tegerstedt, Christine Rubertsson
{"title":"产后会阴疼痛及其与二级裂伤和会阴创伤的关系--随机对照试验的后续研究。","authors":"Malin Edqvist,&nbsp;Gunilla Ajne,&nbsp;Pia Teleman,&nbsp;Gunilla Tegerstedt,&nbsp;Christine Rubertsson","doi":"10.1111/aogs.14938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Postnatal perineal pain is prevalent following childbirth and can impact women both physically and emotionally. The aim of the study was to study the effect of collegial midwifery assistance on perineal pain and pain medication 1 month after birth and to investigate the associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of intercourse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A follow-up questionnaire was sent 1 month postpartum to women with a first spontaneous vaginal birth participating in a randomized controlled trial (Oneplus trial). Data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020. Differences in perineal pain between women attended by one or two midwives were analyzed according to intention-to-treat using bivariate analyses. Associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of sexual intercourse were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The category no tear/first-degree tear was compared separately to each of the other tear categories. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Out of 2233 women, 1762 responded within 30–60 days postpartum. Of women in the no tear/first-degree tear category, 27.7% reported perineal pain during the past week, in contrast to women with OASI, where 64.2% reported perineal pain. Women with OASI experienced the highest odds of perineal pain (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.72–7.47) compared to those with no tear/first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45–2.41), women with an episiotomy (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11–2.87), and those with minor second-degree tears (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06–1.94). Women with episiotomy reported the highest odds ratios for dissatisfaction with tear healing (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92–6.31). No significant differences in perineal pain and pain medication were observed between women allocated to collegial midwifery assistance and those allocated to standard care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Women with OASI reported the highest odds of perineal pain 30–60 days after birth compared to women with no tear or first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears. Women subjected to an episiotomy reported highest odds ratios of dissatisfaction with tear healing.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6990,"journal":{"name":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","volume":"103 11","pages":"2314-2323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma—A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Malin Edqvist,&nbsp;Gunilla Ajne,&nbsp;Pia Teleman,&nbsp;Gunilla Tegerstedt,&nbsp;Christine Rubertsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aogs.14938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Postnatal perineal pain is prevalent following childbirth and can impact women both physically and emotionally. The aim of the study was to study the effect of collegial midwifery assistance on perineal pain and pain medication 1 month after birth and to investigate the associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of intercourse.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A follow-up questionnaire was sent 1 month postpartum to women with a first spontaneous vaginal birth participating in a randomized controlled trial (Oneplus trial). Data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020. Differences in perineal pain between women attended by one or two midwives were analyzed according to intention-to-treat using bivariate analyses. Associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of sexual intercourse were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The category no tear/first-degree tear was compared separately to each of the other tear categories. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Out of 2233 women, 1762 responded within 30–60 days postpartum. Of women in the no tear/first-degree tear category, 27.7% reported perineal pain during the past week, in contrast to women with OASI, where 64.2% reported perineal pain. Women with OASI experienced the highest odds of perineal pain (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.72–7.47) compared to those with no tear/first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45–2.41), women with an episiotomy (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11–2.87), and those with minor second-degree tears (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06–1.94). Women with episiotomy reported the highest odds ratios for dissatisfaction with tear healing (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92–6.31). No significant differences in perineal pain and pain medication were observed between women allocated to collegial midwifery assistance and those allocated to standard care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Women with OASI reported the highest odds of perineal pain 30–60 days after birth compared to women with no tear or first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears. Women subjected to an episiotomy reported highest odds ratios of dissatisfaction with tear healing.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"103 11\",\"pages\":\"2314-2323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11502413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14938\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aogs.14938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介产后会阴疼痛是产后的常见病,会对妇女的身体和情绪造成影响。本研究的目的是研究助产士共同协助对产后 1 个月会阴疼痛和止痛药物的影响,并调查撕裂类型与会阴疼痛、愈合满意度和恢复性交之间的关联:对参与随机对照试验(Oneplus 试验)的首次自然阴道分娩的产妇进行产后 1 个月的随访问卷调查。数据收集时间为 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月。根据意向治疗,使用双变量分析法对由一名或两名助产士护理的产妇会阴疼痛的差异进行了分析。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析了撕裂类型与会阴疼痛、愈合满意度和恢复性交之间的关系。无撕裂/一级撕裂类别与其他撕裂类别分别进行了比较:试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962.Results:在 2233 名妇女中,有 1762 名妇女在产后 30-60 天内做出了反应。在无撕裂/一级撕裂的妇女中,27.7%的人在过去一周内报告过会阴疼痛,而在患有OASI的妇女中,64.2%的人报告过会阴疼痛。与无撕裂/一度撕裂的妇女相比,OASI 妇女发生会阴疼痛的几率最高(aOR 4.51,95% CI 2.72-7.47),其次是二度撕裂的妇女(aOR 1.87,95% CI 1.45-2.41)、进行过会阴切开术的妇女(aOR 1.78,95% CI 1.11-2.87)和二度轻微撕裂的妇女(aOR 1.43,95% CI 1.06-1.94)。接受外阴切开术的妇女对撕裂愈合不满意的几率最高(aOR 3.48,95% CI 1.92-6.31)。在会阴疼痛和止痛药物方面,接受联合助产协助的产妇与接受标准护理的产妇没有明显差异:结论:与无撕裂或一级撕裂的产妇相比,患有OASI的产妇在产后30-60天出现会阴疼痛的几率最高,其次是患有二级撕裂的产妇。接受会阴切开术的产妇对撕裂愈合不满意的几率最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postpartum perineal pain and its association with sub-classified second-degree tears and perineal trauma—A follow-up of a randomized controlled trial

Introduction

Postnatal perineal pain is prevalent following childbirth and can impact women both physically and emotionally. The aim of the study was to study the effect of collegial midwifery assistance on perineal pain and pain medication 1 month after birth and to investigate the associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of intercourse.

Material and Methods

A follow-up questionnaire was sent 1 month postpartum to women with a first spontaneous vaginal birth participating in a randomized controlled trial (Oneplus trial). Data were collected from December 2019 to May 2020. Differences in perineal pain between women attended by one or two midwives were analyzed according to intention-to-treat using bivariate analyses. Associations between the type of tear and perineal pain, satisfaction with healing, and resumption of sexual intercourse were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. The category no tear/first-degree tear was compared separately to each of the other tear categories. Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03770962.

Results

Out of 2233 women, 1762 responded within 30–60 days postpartum. Of women in the no tear/first-degree tear category, 27.7% reported perineal pain during the past week, in contrast to women with OASI, where 64.2% reported perineal pain. Women with OASI experienced the highest odds of perineal pain (aOR 4.51, 95% CI 2.72–7.47) compared to those with no tear/first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears (aOR 1.87, 95% CI 1.45–2.41), women with an episiotomy (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.11–2.87), and those with minor second-degree tears (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.06–1.94). Women with episiotomy reported the highest odds ratios for dissatisfaction with tear healing (aOR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92–6.31). No significant differences in perineal pain and pain medication were observed between women allocated to collegial midwifery assistance and those allocated to standard care.

Conclusions

Women with OASI reported the highest odds of perineal pain 30–60 days after birth compared to women with no tear or first-degree tear, followed by women with major second-degree tears. Women subjected to an episiotomy reported highest odds ratios of dissatisfaction with tear healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
180
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Published monthly, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica is an international journal dedicated to providing the very latest information on the results of both clinical, basic and translational research work related to all aspects of women’s health from around the globe. The journal regularly publishes commentaries, reviews, and original articles on a wide variety of topics including: gynecology, pregnancy, birth, female urology, gynecologic oncology, fertility and reproductive biology.
期刊最新文献
Hospital obstetric volume and maternal outcomes: Does hospital size matter? Prediction of uterine rupture in singleton pregnancies with one prior cesarean birth undergoing TOLAC: A cross-sectional study. Maternal asthma during pregnancy and the likelihood of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study. The interplay of body mass index, gestational weight gain, and birthweight over 3800 g in vaginal breech birth: A retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1