使用点自助终端改善医疗机构 N95/P2 呼吸器密合度的评估:随机对照试验

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008
Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Prabhpreet Kaur, Anand N Ganesan
{"title":"使用点自助终端改善医疗机构 N95/P2 呼吸器密合度的评估:随机对照试验","authors":"Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Prabhpreet Kaur, Anand N Ganesan","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical. No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard \"fit-check\" and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9, P < .001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-7.9, P < .001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, P < .001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a point-of-use kiosk for improving the fit of N95/P2 respirators in health care settings: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Darius Chapman, Campbell Strong, Prabhpreet Kaur, Anand N Ganesan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical. No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard \\\"fit-check\\\" and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9, P < .001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-7.9, P < .001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, P < .001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:验证一次性 N95/P2 半面式呼吸器是否合适至关重要。目前还没有客观的方法来评估使用时的执行情况。方法:使用四种不同款式的呼吸器,对 166 名受试者进行了 657 次密合度定量测试。进行了随机分组;对照组采用标准的 "密合度检查",干预组采用定制的红外线视频亭。主要结果是定量密合度合格率,次要结果是呼吸器类型、性别、种族和以往经验:结果:与对照组(30.8%)相比,干预组的通过率(50.6%)明显更高。与对照组相比,使用 IR Kiosk 的通过率为 2.3(OR 2.3 95%CI 1.8 至 2.9,p):与参与者的人口统计学特征无关,定制的使用点自助服务终端提高了常见呼吸机款式的合格几率。这些发现为解决呼吸保护计划中的一个关键缺口打开了大门,即在风险最高的时候提供个体评估和干预措施,从而提高工人的安全:支持本研究结果的数据可向通讯作者索取。由于数据中包含的信息可能会损害研究参与者的隐私,因此不对外公开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of a point-of-use kiosk for improving the fit of N95/P2 respirators in health care settings: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Fit of N95/P2 half-face respirators is critical. No objective ways exist to evaluate their implementation at use. Previously, we showed 26% of health care workers achieve appropriate fit at point of use.

Methods: 657 quantitative fits were conducted on 166 subjects, using 4 different respirator styles. Randomization was performed; controls employing standard "fit-check" and intervention using a infrared video kiosk. Primary outcome was passing rates of quantitative fit, with secondary outcomes of respirator type, gender, race, and previous experience.

Results: Intervention demonstrated significantly higher pass rate (50.6%) compared with controls (30.8%). Odds of passing with kiosk was 2.3 (odds ratios [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.8-2.9, P < .001). Duckbill style improved the greatest (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-7.9, P < .001), and Tri-fold also showing substantial benefit (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.4-5.2, P < .001). Gender and race did not influence outcomes when using the kiosk, nor did previous experience.

Conclusions: A custom point-of-use kiosk improved odds of achieving a satisfactory fit of common respirator styles, independent of participant demographics. These findings open the door to addressing a gap in respiratory protection programs by providing individual assessment and interventions that improve worker safety at the time of highest risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor on National trends and disparities in herpes zoster vaccination among US older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 2008 to 2022. Response to the letter to the editor on "National trends and disparities in herpes zoster vaccination among US older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2008 to 2022". Response to the letter to the editor regarding "The efficacy of an alcohol-based nasal antiseptic versus mupirocin or an iodophor for preventing SSIs using a meta-analysis". Clinical impact of active screening cultures for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A survey of infection prevention and animal-assisted activity policies in health care facilities-United States, 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1