利用机器学习预测儿科肾移植受者的移植物存活率。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Nephrology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5
Gülşah Kaya Aksoy, Hüseyin Gökhan Akçay, Çağlar Arı, Mehtap Adar, Mustafa Koyun, Elif Çomak, Sema Akman
{"title":"利用机器学习预测儿科肾移植受者的移植物存活率。","authors":"Gülşah Kaya Aksoy, Hüseyin Gökhan Akçay, Çağlar Arı, Mehtap Adar, Mustafa Koyun, Elif Çomak, Sema Akman","doi":"10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplantation can increase graft survival and reduce mortality. Artificial intelligence modelling enables impartial evaluation of clinician bias. This study aimed to examine factors that affect the survival of grafts in paediatric kidney transplantation through the use of machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on records of paediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 2021 and had post-transplant follow-up > 12 months. The nearest neighbour method was used to impute missing fields from a total of 48 variables in the dataset. Models including Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron, and XGBoost were trained to predict graft survival. The study used 80% of the patients for training and the remaining 20% for testing. Modelling success was evaluated based on accuracy and F1 score metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analysed 465 kidney transplant recipients. Of these, 56.7% were male. The mean age at transplantation was 12.08 ± 5.01 years. Of the kidney transplants, 73.1% (n = 339) were from living donors, 34.5% (n = 160) were pre-emptive transplants, and 2.2% (n = 10) were second-time transplants. The machine learning model identified several features associated with graft survival, including antibody-mediated rejection (+ 0.7), acute cellular rejection (+ 0.66), eGFR at 3 years (+ 0.43), eGFR at 5 years (+ 0.34), pre-transplant peritoneal dialysis (+ 0.2), and cadaveric donor (+ 0.2). The successes of the logistic regression and SVM models were similar. The F1 score was 91.9%, and accuracy was 96.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning can be used to identify factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. By expanding similar studies, risk maps can be created prior to transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19735,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"203-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Gülşah Kaya Aksoy, Hüseyin Gökhan Akçay, Çağlar Arı, Mehtap Adar, Mustafa Koyun, Elif Çomak, Sema Akman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identification of factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplantation can increase graft survival and reduce mortality. Artificial intelligence modelling enables impartial evaluation of clinician bias. This study aimed to examine factors that affect the survival of grafts in paediatric kidney transplantation through the use of machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on records of paediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 2021 and had post-transplant follow-up > 12 months. The nearest neighbour method was used to impute missing fields from a total of 48 variables in the dataset. Models including Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron, and XGBoost were trained to predict graft survival. The study used 80% of the patients for training and the remaining 20% for testing. Modelling success was evaluated based on accuracy and F1 score metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analysed 465 kidney transplant recipients. Of these, 56.7% were male. The mean age at transplantation was 12.08 ± 5.01 years. Of the kidney transplants, 73.1% (n = 339) were from living donors, 34.5% (n = 160) were pre-emptive transplants, and 2.2% (n = 10) were second-time transplants. The machine learning model identified several features associated with graft survival, including antibody-mediated rejection (+ 0.7), acute cellular rejection (+ 0.66), eGFR at 3 years (+ 0.43), eGFR at 5 years (+ 0.34), pre-transplant peritoneal dialysis (+ 0.2), and cadaveric donor (+ 0.2). The successes of the logistic regression and SVM models were similar. The F1 score was 91.9%, and accuracy was 96.5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning can be used to identify factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. By expanding similar studies, risk maps can be created prior to transplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"203-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-024-06484-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:确定影响肾移植移植物存活率的因素可以提高移植物存活率并降低死亡率。人工智能建模可以公正地评估临床医生的偏差。本研究旨在通过使用机器学习,研究影响儿科肾移植移植物存活率的因素:对 1994 年至 2021 年期间接受肾移植且移植后随访时间超过 12 个月的儿科患者的记录进行了回顾性审查。数据集中共有 48 个变量,采用近邻法对缺失字段进行补偿。对包括 Naive Bayes、逻辑回归、支持向量机 (SVM)、多层感知器和 XGBoost 在内的模型进行了训练,以预测移植物存活率。研究使用 80% 的患者进行训练,其余 20% 的患者进行测试。根据准确率和 F1 分数指标评估建模的成功率:研究分析了 465 名肾移植受者。其中,56.7%为男性。移植时的平均年龄为 12.08 ± 5.01 岁。在肾移植患者中,73.1%(n = 339)来自活体捐献者,34.5%(n = 160)为抢救性移植,2.2%(n = 10)为二次移植。机器学习模型确定了与移植物存活率相关的几个特征,包括抗体介导的排斥反应(+ 0.7)、急性细胞排斥反应(+ 0.66)、3 年的 eGFR(+ 0.43)、5 年的 eGFR(+ 0.34)、移植前腹膜透析(+ 0.2)和尸体供体(+ 0.2)。逻辑回归模型和 SVM 模型的成功率相似。F1得分率为91.9%,准确率为96.5%:结论:机器学习可用于识别影响肾移植受者移植物存活率的因素。通过扩大类似研究,可以在移植前绘制风险图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting graft survival in paediatric kidney transplant recipients using machine learning.

Background: Identification of factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplantation can increase graft survival and reduce mortality. Artificial intelligence modelling enables impartial evaluation of clinician bias. This study aimed to examine factors that affect the survival of grafts in paediatric kidney transplantation through the use of machine learning.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on records of paediatric patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1994 and 2021 and had post-transplant follow-up > 12 months. The nearest neighbour method was used to impute missing fields from a total of 48 variables in the dataset. Models including Naive Bayes, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron, and XGBoost were trained to predict graft survival. The study used 80% of the patients for training and the remaining 20% for testing. Modelling success was evaluated based on accuracy and F1 score metrics.

Results: The study analysed 465 kidney transplant recipients. Of these, 56.7% were male. The mean age at transplantation was 12.08 ± 5.01 years. Of the kidney transplants, 73.1% (n = 339) were from living donors, 34.5% (n = 160) were pre-emptive transplants, and 2.2% (n = 10) were second-time transplants. The machine learning model identified several features associated with graft survival, including antibody-mediated rejection (+ 0.7), acute cellular rejection (+ 0.66), eGFR at 3 years (+ 0.43), eGFR at 5 years (+ 0.34), pre-transplant peritoneal dialysis (+ 0.2), and cadaveric donor (+ 0.2). The successes of the logistic regression and SVM models were similar. The F1 score was 91.9%, and accuracy was 96.5%.

Conclusion: Machine learning can be used to identify factors that affect graft survival in kidney transplant recipients. By expanding similar studies, risk maps can be created prior to transplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Nephrology
Pediatric Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Pediatric Nephrology Association Pediatric Nephrology publishes original clinical research related to acute and chronic diseases that affect renal function, blood pressure, and fluid and electrolyte disorders in children. Studies may involve medical, surgical, nutritional, physiologic, biochemical, genetic, pathologic or immunologic aspects of disease, imaging techniques or consequences of acute or chronic kidney disease. There are 12 issues per year that contain Editorial Commentaries, Reviews, Educational Reviews, Original Articles, Brief Reports, Rapid Communications, Clinical Quizzes, and Letters to the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent use of continuous kidney replacement therapy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: what pediatric nephrologists need to know-PCRRT-ICONIC practice points. Furosemide stress test to predict acute kidney injury progression in critically ill children. A better future for children with STEC-hemolytic uremic syndrome: news from Argentina. Acetaminophen induced high anion gap metabolic acidosis: a potentially under-recognized consequence from a common medication. Malnutrition management in children with chronic kidney disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1