杏仁核 fMRI--对现有文献的批判性评估。

IF 2.9 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Insights Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26331055241270591
Tim Varkevisser, Elbert Geuze, Jack van Honk
{"title":"杏仁核 fMRI--对现有文献的批判性评估。","authors":"Tim Varkevisser, Elbert Geuze, Jack van Honk","doi":"10.1177/26331055241270591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even before the advent of fMRI, the amygdala occupied a central space in the affective neurosciences. Yet this amygdala-centred view on emotion processing gained even wider acceptance after the inception of fMRI in the early 1990s, a landmark that triggered a goldrush of fMRI studies targeting the amygdala in vivo. Initially, this amygdala fMRI research was mostly confined to task-activation studies measuring the magnitude of the amygdala's response to emotional stimuli. Later, interest began to shift more towards the study of the amygdala's resting-state functional connectivity and task-based psychophysiological interactions. Later still, the test-retest reliability of amygdala fMRI came under closer scrutiny, while at the same time, amygdala-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback gained widespread popularity. Each of these major subdomains of amygdala fMRI research has left its marks on the field of affective neuroscience at large. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical assessment of this literature. By integrating the insights garnered by these research branches, we aim to answer the question: What part (if any) can amygdala fMRI still play within the current landscape of affective neuroscience? Our findings show that serious questions can be raised with regard to both the reliability and validity of amygdala fMRI. These conclusions force us to cast doubt on the continued viability of amygdala fMRI as a core pilar of the affective neurosciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36527,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amygdala fMRI-A Critical Appraisal of the Extant Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Varkevisser, Elbert Geuze, Jack van Honk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26331055241270591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Even before the advent of fMRI, the amygdala occupied a central space in the affective neurosciences. Yet this amygdala-centred view on emotion processing gained even wider acceptance after the inception of fMRI in the early 1990s, a landmark that triggered a goldrush of fMRI studies targeting the amygdala in vivo. Initially, this amygdala fMRI research was mostly confined to task-activation studies measuring the magnitude of the amygdala's response to emotional stimuli. Later, interest began to shift more towards the study of the amygdala's resting-state functional connectivity and task-based psychophysiological interactions. Later still, the test-retest reliability of amygdala fMRI came under closer scrutiny, while at the same time, amygdala-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback gained widespread popularity. Each of these major subdomains of amygdala fMRI research has left its marks on the field of affective neuroscience at large. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical assessment of this literature. By integrating the insights garnered by these research branches, we aim to answer the question: What part (if any) can amygdala fMRI still play within the current landscape of affective neuroscience? Our findings show that serious questions can be raised with regard to both the reliability and validity of amygdala fMRI. These conclusions force us to cast doubt on the continued viability of amygdala fMRI as a core pilar of the affective neurosciences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroscience Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325331/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroscience Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055241270591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055241270591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甚至在fMRI出现之前,杏仁核就已经占据了情感神经科学的中心位置。然而,这种以杏仁核为中心的情绪处理观点在 20 世纪 90 年代初的 fMRI 出现后得到了更广泛的认可,这一里程碑式的事件引发了针对杏仁核的体内 fMRI 研究热潮。最初,这种杏仁核 fMRI 研究主要局限于任务激活研究,测量杏仁核对情绪刺激的反应程度。后来,人们的兴趣开始更多地转向研究杏仁核的静息状态功能连接和基于任务的心理生理学相互作用。后来,杏仁核 fMRI 的测试重复可靠性受到了更严格的审查,与此同时,基于杏仁核的实时 fMRI 神经反馈技术也得到了广泛的普及。杏仁核 fMRI 研究的每一个主要子领域都在整个情感神经科学领域留下了自己的印记。本综述旨在对这些文献进行批判性评估。通过整合这些研究分支所获得的见解,我们旨在回答以下问题:杏仁核 fMRI 在当前情感神经科学领域还能发挥什么作用(如果有的话)?我们的研究结果表明,杏仁核 fMRI 的可靠性和有效性都存在严重问题。这些结论迫使我们对杏仁核 fMRI 作为情感神经科学的核心支柱是否仍然可行表示怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amygdala fMRI-A Critical Appraisal of the Extant Literature.

Even before the advent of fMRI, the amygdala occupied a central space in the affective neurosciences. Yet this amygdala-centred view on emotion processing gained even wider acceptance after the inception of fMRI in the early 1990s, a landmark that triggered a goldrush of fMRI studies targeting the amygdala in vivo. Initially, this amygdala fMRI research was mostly confined to task-activation studies measuring the magnitude of the amygdala's response to emotional stimuli. Later, interest began to shift more towards the study of the amygdala's resting-state functional connectivity and task-based psychophysiological interactions. Later still, the test-retest reliability of amygdala fMRI came under closer scrutiny, while at the same time, amygdala-based real-time fMRI neurofeedback gained widespread popularity. Each of these major subdomains of amygdala fMRI research has left its marks on the field of affective neuroscience at large. The purpose of this review is to provide a critical assessment of this literature. By integrating the insights garnered by these research branches, we aim to answer the question: What part (if any) can amygdala fMRI still play within the current landscape of affective neuroscience? Our findings show that serious questions can be raised with regard to both the reliability and validity of amygdala fMRI. These conclusions force us to cast doubt on the continued viability of amygdala fMRI as a core pilar of the affective neurosciences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Insights
Neuroscience Insights Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The 3D Genome in Brain Development: An Exploration of Molecular Mechanisms and Experimental Methods. Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiology and Evolving Treatment Approaches. Increased Resting-State BOLD Turnover (TBOLD) is Associated With Decreased Cognitive Performance During Aging. Cerebral Proteomic Changes in the rTg-D Rat Model of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy Type-2 With Cortical Microhemorrhages and Cognitive Impairments. Neuroimaging and the Investigation of Drug-Drug Interactions Involving Psychedelics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1