医院降低成本和提高质量的策略:对医院领导的调查。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Managed Care Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593
Gmerice Hammond, Tierney Lanter, Fengxian Wang, R J Waken, Jie Zheng, Arnold M Epstein, E John Orav, Karen E Joynt Maddox
{"title":"医院降低成本和提高质量的策略:对医院领导的调查。","authors":"Gmerice Hammond, Tierney Lanter, Fengxian Wang, R J Waken, Jie Zheng, Arnold M Epstein, E John Orav, Karen E Joynt Maddox","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hospitals in the US operate under various value-based payment programs, but little is known regarding the strategies they use in this context to improve quality and reduce costs, overall or in voluntary programs including Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A survey was administered to hospital leaders at 588 randomly selected acute care hospitals, with oversampling of BPCI-A participants, from November 2020 to June 2021. Twenty strategies and 20 barriers were queried in 4 domains: inpatient, postacute, outpatient, and community resources for vulnerable patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Summary statistics were tabulated, and responses were adjusted for sampling strategy and nonresponse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 203 respondents (35%), of which 159 (78%) were BPCI-A participants and 44 (22%) were nonparticipants. On average, respondents reported implementing 89% of queried strategies in the inpatient domain, such as care pathways or predictive analytics; 65% of postacute strategies, such as forming partnerships with skilled nursing facilities; 84% of outpatient strategies, such as scheduling close follow-up to prevent emergency department visits/hospitalizations; and 82% of strategies aimed at high-risk populations, such as building connections with community resources. There were no differences between BPCI-A and non-BPCI-A hospitals in 19 of 20 care redesign strategies queried. However, 78.3% of BPCI-A-participating hospitals reported programs aimed at reducing utilization of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities compared with 37.6% of non-BPCI-A hospitals (P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitals pursue a broad range of efforts to improve quality. BPCI-A hospitals have attempted to reduce use of postacute care, but otherwise the strategies they pursue are similar to other hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospitals' strategies to reduce costs and improve quality: survey of hospital leaders.\",\"authors\":\"Gmerice Hammond, Tierney Lanter, Fengxian Wang, R J Waken, Jie Zheng, Arnold M Epstein, E John Orav, Karen E Joynt Maddox\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hospitals in the US operate under various value-based payment programs, but little is known regarding the strategies they use in this context to improve quality and reduce costs, overall or in voluntary programs including Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A survey was administered to hospital leaders at 588 randomly selected acute care hospitals, with oversampling of BPCI-A participants, from November 2020 to June 2021. Twenty strategies and 20 barriers were queried in 4 domains: inpatient, postacute, outpatient, and community resources for vulnerable patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Summary statistics were tabulated, and responses were adjusted for sampling strategy and nonresponse.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 203 respondents (35%), of which 159 (78%) were BPCI-A participants and 44 (22%) were nonparticipants. On average, respondents reported implementing 89% of queried strategies in the inpatient domain, such as care pathways or predictive analytics; 65% of postacute strategies, such as forming partnerships with skilled nursing facilities; 84% of outpatient strategies, such as scheduling close follow-up to prevent emergency department visits/hospitalizations; and 82% of strategies aimed at high-risk populations, such as building connections with community resources. There were no differences between BPCI-A and non-BPCI-A hospitals in 19 of 20 care redesign strategies queried. However, 78.3% of BPCI-A-participating hospitals reported programs aimed at reducing utilization of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities compared with 37.6% of non-BPCI-A hospitals (P < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hospitals pursue a broad range of efforts to improve quality. BPCI-A hospitals have attempted to reduce use of postacute care, but otherwise the strategies they pursue are similar to other hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:美国的医院在各种基于价值的支付计划下运营,但对于医院在此背景下为提高质量和降低成本而采用的策略,无论是整体策略还是包括 "改善医疗服务捆绑支付高级计划"(BPCI-A)在内的自愿性计划,人们知之甚少:研究设计:2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,对随机抽取的 588 家急症护理医院的医院领导进行了调查,其中包括 BPCI-A 参与者。共调查了 4 个领域中的 20 项策略和 20 项障碍:住院患者、急性期后患者、门诊患者和弱势患者的社区资源:方法:列出简要统计数据,并根据抽样策略和无回复情况对回复进行调整:共有 203 位受访者(35%),其中 159 位(78%)为 BPCI-A 参与者,44 位(22%)为非参与者。平均而言,受访者报告实施了 89% 的住院领域策略,如护理路径或预测分析;65% 的急性期后策略,如与专业护理机构建立合作关系;84% 的门诊策略,如安排密切随访以防止急诊就诊/住院;以及 82% 的针对高风险人群的策略,如与社区资源建立联系。在所调查的 20 项护理重新设计策略中,有 19 项在 BPCI-A 医院和非 BPCI-A 医院之间没有差异。但是,78.3% 的 BPCI-A 参与医院报告了旨在减少专业护理和住院康复设施使用的计划,而非 BPCI-A 医院的这一比例为 37.6%(P 结论:BPCI-A 参与医院和非 BPCI-A 医院在减少专业护理和住院康复设施使用方面开展了广泛的工作:医院为提高质量做出了广泛的努力。BPCI-A 医院已尝试减少急性期后护理的使用,但除此之外,他们所采取的策略与其他医院类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospitals' strategies to reduce costs and improve quality: survey of hospital leaders.

Objectives: Hospitals in the US operate under various value-based payment programs, but little is known regarding the strategies they use in this context to improve quality and reduce costs, overall or in voluntary programs including Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Advanced (BPCI-A).

Study design: A survey was administered to hospital leaders at 588 randomly selected acute care hospitals, with oversampling of BPCI-A participants, from November 2020 to June 2021. Twenty strategies and 20 barriers were queried in 4 domains: inpatient, postacute, outpatient, and community resources for vulnerable patients.

Methods: Summary statistics were tabulated, and responses were adjusted for sampling strategy and nonresponse.

Results: There were 203 respondents (35%), of which 159 (78%) were BPCI-A participants and 44 (22%) were nonparticipants. On average, respondents reported implementing 89% of queried strategies in the inpatient domain, such as care pathways or predictive analytics; 65% of postacute strategies, such as forming partnerships with skilled nursing facilities; 84% of outpatient strategies, such as scheduling close follow-up to prevent emergency department visits/hospitalizations; and 82% of strategies aimed at high-risk populations, such as building connections with community resources. There were no differences between BPCI-A and non-BPCI-A hospitals in 19 of 20 care redesign strategies queried. However, 78.3% of BPCI-A-participating hospitals reported programs aimed at reducing utilization of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities compared with 37.6% of non-BPCI-A hospitals (P < .0001).

Conclusions: Hospitals pursue a broad range of efforts to improve quality. BPCI-A hospitals have attempted to reduce use of postacute care, but otherwise the strategies they pursue are similar to other hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Clinical perspectives in bronchiectasis management. A machine learning technology for addressing medication-related risk in older, multimorbid patients. Adherence patterns 1 year after initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors: results of a national cohort study. An efficient approach to expand equitable access to antiobesity medications: deprescribing after weight loss plateau. Care management improves total cost of care for patients with dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1