基于单细胞RNA测序数据集的膀胱癌肿瘤微环境相关基因预后模型的鉴定与验证

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1200/PO.23.00661
Imran Safder, Henkel Valentine, Nicole Uzzo, John Sfakianos, Robert Uzzo, Shilpa Gupta, Jason Brown, Daniel Ranti, Elizabeth Plimack, George Haber, Christopher Weight, Alexander Kutikov, Philip Abbosh, Laura Bukavina
{"title":"基于单细胞RNA测序数据集的膀胱癌肿瘤微环境相关基因预后模型的鉴定与验证","authors":"Imran Safder, Henkel Valentine, Nicole Uzzo, John Sfakianos, Robert Uzzo, Shilpa Gupta, Jason Brown, Daniel Ranti, Elizabeth Plimack, George Haber, Christopher Weight, Alexander Kutikov, Philip Abbosh, Laura Bukavina","doi":"10.1200/PO.23.00661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cellular diversity in bladder cancer (BLCA) progression, leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data to identify potential prognostic biomarkers and construct a prognostic model for BLCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed scRNA-seq data of normal and tumor bladder cells from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to uncover crucial markers within the bladder TME. The study compared gene expression in normal versus tumor bladder cells, identifying differentially expressed genes. These genes were subsequently assessed for their prognostic significance using patient follow-up data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Prognostic models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and multivariate Cox regression analyses, focusing on eight genes of interest. The predictive performance of the model was also tested against additional GEO data sets (GSE31684, GSE13507, and GSE32894).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prognostic model demonstrated reliable prediction of patient outcomes. Validation through gene set enrichment analysis and immune cell infiltration assessment supported the model's efficacy. The results from both the univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that the risk score is an independent prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 2.97 (95% CI, 2.28 to 3.9, <i>P</i> < .001). In the validation cohort, the AUC at 1, 2, and 3 years is 0.74, 0.74, and 0.72, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings proposed biomarkers with prognostic potential, laying the groundwork for future in vitro validation and therapeutic exploration. This contributes to a deeper understanding of the genes associated with bladder TME and may improve prognostic precision in BLCA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2300661"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371085/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification and Validation of Prognostic Model for Tumor Microenvironment-Associated Genes in Bladder Cancer Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Sets.\",\"authors\":\"Imran Safder, Henkel Valentine, Nicole Uzzo, John Sfakianos, Robert Uzzo, Shilpa Gupta, Jason Brown, Daniel Ranti, Elizabeth Plimack, George Haber, Christopher Weight, Alexander Kutikov, Philip Abbosh, Laura Bukavina\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.23.00661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cellular diversity in bladder cancer (BLCA) progression, leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data to identify potential prognostic biomarkers and construct a prognostic model for BLCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed scRNA-seq data of normal and tumor bladder cells from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to uncover crucial markers within the bladder TME. The study compared gene expression in normal versus tumor bladder cells, identifying differentially expressed genes. These genes were subsequently assessed for their prognostic significance using patient follow-up data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Prognostic models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and multivariate Cox regression analyses, focusing on eight genes of interest. The predictive performance of the model was also tested against additional GEO data sets (GSE31684, GSE13507, and GSE32894).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prognostic model demonstrated reliable prediction of patient outcomes. Validation through gene set enrichment analysis and immune cell infiltration assessment supported the model's efficacy. The results from both the univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that the risk score is an independent prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 2.97 (95% CI, 2.28 to 3.9, <i>P</i> < .001). In the validation cohort, the AUC at 1, 2, and 3 years is 0.74, 0.74, and 0.72, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings proposed biomarkers with prognostic potential, laying the groundwork for future in vitro validation and therapeutic exploration. This contributes to a deeper understanding of the genes associated with bladder TME and may improve prognostic precision in BLCA management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2300661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371085/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00661\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.23.00661","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在阐明肿瘤微环境(TME)与膀胱癌(BLCA)进展过程中细胞多样性之间的关系,利用单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)数据确定潜在的预后生物标志物,并构建BLCA的预后模型:我们分析了基因表达总库(GEO)数据库中正常和肿瘤膀胱细胞的scRNA-seq数据,以发现膀胱TME中的关键标记物。研究比较了正常膀胱细胞和肿瘤膀胱细胞的基因表达,确定了不同表达的基因。随后,利用癌症基因组图谱(The Cancer Genome Atlas)中的患者随访数据对这些基因的预后意义进行了评估。利用最小绝对缩减和选择操作器以及多变量考克斯回归分析构建了预后模型,重点分析了八个相关基因。该模型的预测性能还通过其他 GEO 数据集(GSE31684、GSE13507 和 GSE32894)进行了测试:结果:预后模型对患者的预后进行了可靠的预测。通过基因组富集分析和免疫细胞浸润评估验证了该模型的有效性。单变量和多变量分析结果表明,风险评分是一个独立的预后因素,其危险比为 2.97(95% CI,2.28 至 3.9,P < .001)。在验证队列中,1年、2年和3年的AUC分别为0.74、0.74和0.72:我们的研究结果提出了具有预后潜力的生物标志物,为未来的体外验证和治疗探索奠定了基础。这有助于加深对膀胱TME相关基因的理解,并可提高BLCA管理的预后精确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification and Validation of Prognostic Model for Tumor Microenvironment-Associated Genes in Bladder Cancer Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Sets.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the relationship between the tumor microenvironment (TME) and cellular diversity in bladder cancer (BLCA) progression, leveraging single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data to identify potential prognostic biomarkers and construct a prognostic model for BLCA.

Methods: We analyzed scRNA-seq data of normal and tumor bladder cells from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to uncover crucial markers within the bladder TME. The study compared gene expression in normal versus tumor bladder cells, identifying differentially expressed genes. These genes were subsequently assessed for their prognostic significance using patient follow-up data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Prognostic models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator and multivariate Cox regression analyses, focusing on eight genes of interest. The predictive performance of the model was also tested against additional GEO data sets (GSE31684, GSE13507, and GSE32894).

Results: The prognostic model demonstrated reliable prediction of patient outcomes. Validation through gene set enrichment analysis and immune cell infiltration assessment supported the model's efficacy. The results from both the univariate and multivariate analyses suggest that the risk score is an independent prognostic factor with a hazard ratio of 2.97 (95% CI, 2.28 to 3.9, P < .001). In the validation cohort, the AUC at 1, 2, and 3 years is 0.74, 0.74, and 0.72, respectively.

Conclusion: Our findings proposed biomarkers with prognostic potential, laying the groundwork for future in vitro validation and therapeutic exploration. This contributes to a deeper understanding of the genes associated with bladder TME and may improve prognostic precision in BLCA management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
期刊最新文献
DNA Damage Response Alterations Predict for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Correlative Analysis of the SWOG S1314 Trial. Erratum: Tumor Characteristics Associated With Preoperatively Detectable Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With Renal Masses Suspicious for Renal Cell Carcinoma. DNA Methylation Classes of Stage II and III Primary Melanomas and Their Clinical and Prognostic Significance. KRASG12D-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Clinical, Molecular, Immunologic, and Prognostic Features of a New Emerging Targeted Alteration. Neo-wt-RAS in ctDNA: Is It Worth Using Anti-EGFR Therapies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1