患者报告的吞咽结果测量方法:建议的核对表。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00403
Yael Shapira-Galitz, Amber Anderson, Matina Balou
{"title":"患者报告的吞咽结果测量方法:建议的核对表。","authors":"Yael Shapira-Galitz, Amber Anderson, Matina Balou","doi":"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important tool both in clinical practice and research involving patients with swallowing disorders. There are several challenges to be overcome and methodological details to be adequately reported to ensure rigor and transparency in studies utilizing PROMs in dysphagia research. For this reason, the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a critical appraisal tool developed to ensure rigor and transparency in dysphagia research, has devoted a domain to PROMs. The aim of this current article, as part of a larger forum of articles, is to present the PROM section of FRONTIERS and describe its development.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was carried out on PROMs in the field of dysphagia by three members of the FRONTIERS collaborative to identify items that were necessary for the rigorous application and transparent reporting of PROMs utilized in research of swallowing disorders in human subjects. Framework items were then subjected to an iterative process of feedback and consensus among the three members of the working group as well as all members of the FRONTIERS collaborative. Items were flagged for review and revised as needed until consensus was achieved on the final list. The final item list was compared to existing critical appraisal tools for PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final checklist for the PROMs domain included 20 \"Yes/No\" questions that can be broadly divided into three categories: (a) development and validation, (b) patient population, and (c) PROM administration method. Each item is presented with a rationale for its inclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the FRONTIERS Framework will serve researchers and those appraising quality of research involving PROMs. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist.\",\"authors\":\"Yael Shapira-Galitz, Amber Anderson, Matina Balou\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important tool both in clinical practice and research involving patients with swallowing disorders. There are several challenges to be overcome and methodological details to be adequately reported to ensure rigor and transparency in studies utilizing PROMs in dysphagia research. For this reason, the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a critical appraisal tool developed to ensure rigor and transparency in dysphagia research, has devoted a domain to PROMs. The aim of this current article, as part of a larger forum of articles, is to present the PROM section of FRONTIERS and describe its development.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was carried out on PROMs in the field of dysphagia by three members of the FRONTIERS collaborative to identify items that were necessary for the rigorous application and transparent reporting of PROMs utilized in research of swallowing disorders in human subjects. Framework items were then subjected to an iterative process of feedback and consensus among the three members of the working group as well as all members of the FRONTIERS collaborative. Items were flagged for review and revised as needed until consensus was achieved on the final list. The final item list was compared to existing critical appraisal tools for PROMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final checklist for the PROMs domain included 20 \\\"Yes/No\\\" questions that can be broadly divided into three categories: (a) development and validation, (b) patient population, and (c) PROM administration method. Each item is presented with a rationale for its inclusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the FRONTIERS Framework will serve researchers and those appraising quality of research involving PROMs. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00403\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_AJSLP-23-00403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在涉及吞咽障碍患者的临床实践和研究中,患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)都是一种重要的工具。要确保在吞咽困难研究中使用 PROMs 的严谨性和透明度,需要克服一些挑战并充分报告方法细节。因此,为确保吞咽困难研究的严谨性和透明度而开发的批判性评估工具--"吞咽困难研究的严谨性和透明度框架"(Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing,简称 FRONTIERS)专门设立了一个 PROMs 领域。本文是更大范围文章论坛的一部分,旨在介绍 FRONTIERS 的 PROM 部分并描述其发展情况:方法:FRONTIERS 合作小组的三位成员对吞咽困难领域的 PROMs 进行了文献综述,以确定在人体吞咽障碍研究中严格应用和透明报告 PROMs 所必需的项目。然后,工作小组的三位成员以及 FRONTIERS 合作小组的所有成员对框架项目进行反复反馈并达成共识。在就最终清单达成共识之前,会对项目进行标记审查,并根据需要进行修订。将最终的项目清单与现有的 PROMs 关键评估工具进行比较:PROMs 领域的最终核对表包括 20 个 "是/否 "问题,可大致分为三类:(a) 开发与验证,(b) 患者群体,(c) PROM 管理方法。每个项目均附有纳入理由:结论:FRONTIERS 框架的使用将为研究人员和涉及 PROMs 的研究质量评估人员提供服务。更广泛地说,FRONTIERS 框架将有助于提高吞咽困难研究的严谨性和透明度。本文还讨论了特别注意事项和未来目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist.

Purpose: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are an important tool both in clinical practice and research involving patients with swallowing disorders. There are several challenges to be overcome and methodological details to be adequately reported to ensure rigor and transparency in studies utilizing PROMs in dysphagia research. For this reason, the Framework for RigOr aNd Transparency In REseaRch on Swallowing (FRONTIERS), a critical appraisal tool developed to ensure rigor and transparency in dysphagia research, has devoted a domain to PROMs. The aim of this current article, as part of a larger forum of articles, is to present the PROM section of FRONTIERS and describe its development.

Method: A literature review was carried out on PROMs in the field of dysphagia by three members of the FRONTIERS collaborative to identify items that were necessary for the rigorous application and transparent reporting of PROMs utilized in research of swallowing disorders in human subjects. Framework items were then subjected to an iterative process of feedback and consensus among the three members of the working group as well as all members of the FRONTIERS collaborative. Items were flagged for review and revised as needed until consensus was achieved on the final list. The final item list was compared to existing critical appraisal tools for PROMs.

Results: The final checklist for the PROMs domain included 20 "Yes/No" questions that can be broadly divided into three categories: (a) development and validation, (b) patient population, and (c) PROM administration method. Each item is presented with a rationale for its inclusion.

Conclusions: The use of the FRONTIERS Framework will serve researchers and those appraising quality of research involving PROMs. More broadly, the FRONTIERS Framework will facilitate improved rigor and transparency across dysphagia research. Special considerations and future goals are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Changes Toward Reflective Practice: Documented Shifts in Speech-Language Pathologists' Evaluation Practices. Efficacy of Complexity-Based Target Selection for Treating Morphosyntactic Deficits in Children With Developmental Language Disorder and Children With Down Syndrome: A Single-Case Experimental Design. Self-Improved Language Production in Nonfluent Aphasia Through Automated Recursive Self-Feedback. The Effects of Functional Reading Activities to Motivate and Empower for Autistic Young Adults: A Single-Case Design Study. Applications of the R.A.I.S.E. Assessment Framework to Support the Process of Assessment in Primary Progressive Aphasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1