前十字韧带损伤后恢复到受伤前的水平。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00660
Kendall Hamilton, J Christian Peterson, Taylor Buuck, Travis Menge
{"title":"前十字韧带损伤后恢复到受伤前的水平。","authors":"Kendall Hamilton, J Christian Peterson, Taylor Buuck, Travis Menge","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury . Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to determine the appropriateness of return to play to pre-injury level after an ACL injury. The AUC for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following ACL Injury were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients wishing to return to play after an ACL injury. These indications were most often clinically significant parameters, including symptoms and diagnostic findings. In addition, \"patient-level variables\" (eg, activity level or demographics) can be considered. A total of 576 patient scenarios and 3 procedure recommendations were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, a separate multidisciplinary rating panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as \"appropriate\" (median rating, 7 to 9), \"may be appropriate\" (median rating, 4 to 6), or \"rarely appropriate\" (median rating, 1 to 3).</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1214-e1217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Kendall Hamilton, J Christian Peterson, Taylor Buuck, Travis Menge\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury . Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to determine the appropriateness of return to play to pre-injury level after an ACL injury. The AUC for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following ACL Injury were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients wishing to return to play after an ACL injury. These indications were most often clinically significant parameters, including symptoms and diagnostic findings. In addition, \\\"patient-level variables\\\" (eg, activity level or demographics) can be considered. A total of 576 patient scenarios and 3 procedure recommendations were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, a separate multidisciplinary rating panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as \\\"appropriate\\\" (median rating, 7 to 9), \\\"may be appropriate\\\" (median rating, 4 to 6), or \\\"rarely appropriate\\\" (median rating, 1 to 3).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1214-e1217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00660\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国矫形外科医师学会制定了《前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤后恢复到受伤前水平的适当使用标准》(AUC)。该标准以证据为基础,结合医生的临床专业知识,用于确定前交叉韧带损伤后恢复到受伤前水平是否合适。前交叉韧带损伤后恢复到受伤前水平的 AUC 是通过确定希望在前交叉韧带损伤后恢复比赛的患者的典型临床指征而得出的。这些指标通常是具有临床意义的参数,包括症状和诊断结果。此外,还可以考虑 "患者水平变量"(如活动水平或人口统计学特征)。由AUC这一主题的临床专家组成的编写小组共制定了576种患者情况和3种手术建议。接下来,一个由专家和非专家组成的独立多学科评分小组采用 9 级评分法对每种患者情况的治疗适宜性进行评分,将治疗定为 "适宜"(中位数为 7 到 9 分)、"可能适宜"(中位数为 4 到 6 分)或 "很少适宜"(中位数为 1 到 3 分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has developed Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injury . Evidence-based information, in conjunction with the clinical expertise of physicians, was used to develop the criteria to determine the appropriateness of return to play to pre-injury level after an ACL injury. The AUC for the Return to Play to Pre-Injury Level Following ACL Injury were derived by identifying clinical indications typical of patients wishing to return to play after an ACL injury. These indications were most often clinically significant parameters, including symptoms and diagnostic findings. In addition, "patient-level variables" (eg, activity level or demographics) can be considered. A total of 576 patient scenarios and 3 procedure recommendations were developed by the writing panel, a group of clinicians who are specialists in this AUC topic. Next, a separate multidisciplinary rating panel (made up of specialists and nonspecialists) rated the appropriateness of treatment of each patient scenario using a 9-point scale to designate a treatment as "appropriate" (median rating, 7 to 9), "may be appropriate" (median rating, 4 to 6), or "rarely appropriate" (median rating, 1 to 3).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Kappa Delta and OREF Awards. The 2024 Kappa Delta Young Investigator Award: Leveraging Insights From Development to Improve Adult Repair: Hedgehog Signaling as a Master Regulator of Enthesis Fibrocartilage Formation. The Role of Amino Acid Supplementation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Erratum. Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before "Two Midnights" in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1