全班网络中错误认识与分享观点意愿的相互作用:以对同性恋的看法为例

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Social Networks Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2024.08.003
Nick Wuestenenk , Tom Nijs , Tobias H. Stark , Frank van Tubergen , Naomi Ellemers
{"title":"全班网络中错误认识与分享观点意愿的相互作用:以对同性恋的看法为例","authors":"Nick Wuestenenk ,&nbsp;Tom Nijs ,&nbsp;Tobias H. Stark ,&nbsp;Frank van Tubergen ,&nbsp;Naomi Ellemers","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social norms influence homophobic behavior, yet these norms are often misperceived. We study the extent to which friendship ties and group memberships are related to misperceptions of opinions towards homosexuality, and how these misperceptions are sustained in social networks through opinion sharing. We find that misperceptions lead individuals to be less willing to share their opinions with ethno-religious ingroup members, non-friends or with individuals whom they perceive to hold different opinions. Although differences observed in the context of this study are relatively small, they may add up over time. These results offer scope for interventions that try to reduce norm misperceptions between groups - as a way to stimulate social change towards a more tolerant society.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"80 ","pages":"Pages 25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000467/pdfft?md5=9f0ecdc3473c5edb29055b380c6ba8cc&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interplay of misperceptions and willingness to share opinions in full classroom networks: The case of opinions towards homosexuality\",\"authors\":\"Nick Wuestenenk ,&nbsp;Tom Nijs ,&nbsp;Tobias H. Stark ,&nbsp;Frank van Tubergen ,&nbsp;Naomi Ellemers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socnet.2024.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social norms influence homophobic behavior, yet these norms are often misperceived. We study the extent to which friendship ties and group memberships are related to misperceptions of opinions towards homosexuality, and how these misperceptions are sustained in social networks through opinion sharing. We find that misperceptions lead individuals to be less willing to share their opinions with ethno-religious ingroup members, non-friends or with individuals whom they perceive to hold different opinions. Although differences observed in the context of this study are relatively small, they may add up over time. These results offer scope for interventions that try to reduce norm misperceptions between groups - as a way to stimulate social change towards a more tolerant society.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Networks\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 25-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000467/pdfft?md5=9f0ecdc3473c5edb29055b380c6ba8cc&pid=1-s2.0-S0378873324000467-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000467\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873324000467","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会规范会影响恐同行为,但这些规范往往被误解。我们研究了友谊关系和群体成员身份与对同性恋看法的误解之间的关系,以及这些误解如何通过意见分享在社交网络中得以维持。我们发现,误解导致人们不太愿意与民族宗教内群体成员、非朋友或他们认为持有不同观点的人分享自己的观点。虽然在本研究中观察到的差异相对较小,但随着时间的推移,这些差异可能会逐渐增大。这些结果为试图减少群体间规范误解的干预措施提供了空间--以此推动社会变革,建立一个更加宽容的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The interplay of misperceptions and willingness to share opinions in full classroom networks: The case of opinions towards homosexuality

Social norms influence homophobic behavior, yet these norms are often misperceived. We study the extent to which friendship ties and group memberships are related to misperceptions of opinions towards homosexuality, and how these misperceptions are sustained in social networks through opinion sharing. We find that misperceptions lead individuals to be less willing to share their opinions with ethno-religious ingroup members, non-friends or with individuals whom they perceive to hold different opinions. Although differences observed in the context of this study are relatively small, they may add up over time. These results offer scope for interventions that try to reduce norm misperceptions between groups - as a way to stimulate social change towards a more tolerant society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
期刊最新文献
Why distinctiveness centrality is distinctive Editorial Board How many friends do youth nominate? A meta-analysis of gender, age, and geographic differences in average outdegree centrality A stopping rule for randomly sampling bipartite networks with fixed degree sequences Multilevel integrated healthcare: The evaluation of Project ECHO® networks to integrate children’s healthcare in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1