在演替过程中影响植被的全球驱动因素:因素和影响

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Journal of Vegetation Science Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1111/jvs.13297
Petra Janečková, Lubomír Tichý, Lawrence R. Walker, Karel Prach
{"title":"在演替过程中影响植被的全球驱动因素:因素和影响","authors":"Petra Janečková,&nbsp;Lubomír Tichý,&nbsp;Lawrence R. Walker,&nbsp;Karel Prach","doi":"10.1111/jvs.13297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Question</h3>\n \n <p>Following a significant disturbance, vegetation development may, or may not reach the desired target. Here, we examine which relevant global environmental factors have a substantial impact on the course of spontaneous vegetation succession, and what their relative relevance is in achieving the desired outcome.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Worldwide.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The outcome of vegetation changes in 528 studies describing spontaneous succession worldwide was classified at a simple, semi-quantitative scale: fully-successful, partly-successful, and unsuccessful, considering 10 different types of disturbances. Latitude, climatic factors (mean annual temperature, annual temperature range, mean annual precipitation, seasonality of precipitation), and biological factors (number of vascular plant species, and number of invasive alien species) were considered as explanatory variables. The ordination method (principal coordinate analysis) was used to visualize relationships among variables and their relationships to succession outcomes. For a detailed insight into the importance of the particular variables, we applied machine learning techniques, specifically one called “conditional random forest”. In addition, the effect of different types of initial disturbance was assessed using Generalized Linear Models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Globally, disturbance type emerged as the most influential factor in determining succession outcomes. The most successful were results from recovering vegetation after fire, whereas the most unsuccessful were those after volcano eruptions. For climatic factors, the success of succession decreased with a low annual temperature range and high temperature mean. Biological factors such as the number of invasive alien species and species richness had the least but significant influence on the succession success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The most relevant factor determining the outcome of spontaneous succession was disturbance type, followed by temperature variables. Notably, latitude emerged as a practical proxy for many ecologically relevant factors. Therefore, we conclude that latitude may be a valuable predictor of the success of succession and, consequently, of the success of ecological restoration projects that are based on spontaneous succession.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vegetation Science","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global drivers influencing vegetation during succession: Factors and implications\",\"authors\":\"Petra Janečková,&nbsp;Lubomír Tichý,&nbsp;Lawrence R. Walker,&nbsp;Karel Prach\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvs.13297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Question</h3>\\n \\n <p>Following a significant disturbance, vegetation development may, or may not reach the desired target. Here, we examine which relevant global environmental factors have a substantial impact on the course of spontaneous vegetation succession, and what their relative relevance is in achieving the desired outcome.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Location</h3>\\n \\n <p>Worldwide.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The outcome of vegetation changes in 528 studies describing spontaneous succession worldwide was classified at a simple, semi-quantitative scale: fully-successful, partly-successful, and unsuccessful, considering 10 different types of disturbances. Latitude, climatic factors (mean annual temperature, annual temperature range, mean annual precipitation, seasonality of precipitation), and biological factors (number of vascular plant species, and number of invasive alien species) were considered as explanatory variables. The ordination method (principal coordinate analysis) was used to visualize relationships among variables and their relationships to succession outcomes. For a detailed insight into the importance of the particular variables, we applied machine learning techniques, specifically one called “conditional random forest”. In addition, the effect of different types of initial disturbance was assessed using Generalized Linear Models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Globally, disturbance type emerged as the most influential factor in determining succession outcomes. The most successful were results from recovering vegetation after fire, whereas the most unsuccessful were those after volcano eruptions. For climatic factors, the success of succession decreased with a low annual temperature range and high temperature mean. Biological factors such as the number of invasive alien species and species richness had the least but significant influence on the succession success.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most relevant factor determining the outcome of spontaneous succession was disturbance type, followed by temperature variables. Notably, latitude emerged as a practical proxy for many ecologically relevant factors. Therefore, we conclude that latitude may be a valuable predictor of the success of succession and, consequently, of the success of ecological restoration projects that are based on spontaneous succession.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vegetation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvs.13297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题 在重大干扰之后,植被发展可能会,也可能不会达到预期目标。在此,我们将研究哪些相关的全球环境因素会对植被自发演替的过程产生重大影响,以及这些因素在实现预期结果方面的相对相关性。 地点 全球。 方法 对全球 528 项描述自发演替的研究中的植被变化结果进行了简单的半定量分类:完全成功、部分成功和不成功,并考虑了 10 种不同类型的干扰。纬度、气候因素(年平均气温、年温差、年平均降水量、降水季节性)和生物因素(维管束植物物种数量和外来入侵物种数量)被视为解释变量。采用主坐标分析法(ordination method)对变量之间的关系及其与演替结果的关系进行可视化分析。为了详细了解特定变量的重要性,我们采用了机器学习技术,特别是一种名为 "条件随机森林 "的技术。此外,我们还利用广义线性模型评估了不同类型初始干扰的影响。 结果 从全球来看,干扰类型是决定演替结果的最有影响力的因素。最成功的是火灾后植被恢复的结果,而最不成功的是火山爆发后植被恢复的结果。在气候因素方面,年平均气温越低,演替的成功率就越低。生物因素(如外来入侵物种的数量和物种丰富度)对演替成功与否的影响最小,但意义重大。 结论 决定自发演替结果的最相关因素是干扰类型,其次是温度变量。值得注意的是,纬度是许多生态相关因素的实用替代物。因此,我们得出结论,纬度可能是预测演替成功与否的一个重要因素,因此也是预测基于自发演替的生态恢复项目成功与否的一个重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Global drivers influencing vegetation during succession: Factors and implications

Question

Following a significant disturbance, vegetation development may, or may not reach the desired target. Here, we examine which relevant global environmental factors have a substantial impact on the course of spontaneous vegetation succession, and what their relative relevance is in achieving the desired outcome.

Location

Worldwide.

Methods

The outcome of vegetation changes in 528 studies describing spontaneous succession worldwide was classified at a simple, semi-quantitative scale: fully-successful, partly-successful, and unsuccessful, considering 10 different types of disturbances. Latitude, climatic factors (mean annual temperature, annual temperature range, mean annual precipitation, seasonality of precipitation), and biological factors (number of vascular plant species, and number of invasive alien species) were considered as explanatory variables. The ordination method (principal coordinate analysis) was used to visualize relationships among variables and their relationships to succession outcomes. For a detailed insight into the importance of the particular variables, we applied machine learning techniques, specifically one called “conditional random forest”. In addition, the effect of different types of initial disturbance was assessed using Generalized Linear Models.

Results

Globally, disturbance type emerged as the most influential factor in determining succession outcomes. The most successful were results from recovering vegetation after fire, whereas the most unsuccessful were those after volcano eruptions. For climatic factors, the success of succession decreased with a low annual temperature range and high temperature mean. Biological factors such as the number of invasive alien species and species richness had the least but significant influence on the succession success.

Conclusions

The most relevant factor determining the outcome of spontaneous succession was disturbance type, followed by temperature variables. Notably, latitude emerged as a practical proxy for many ecologically relevant factors. Therefore, we conclude that latitude may be a valuable predictor of the success of succession and, consequently, of the success of ecological restoration projects that are based on spontaneous succession.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vegetation Science
Journal of Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
60
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vegetation Science publishes papers on all aspects of plant community ecology, with particular emphasis on papers that develop new concepts or methods, test theory, identify general patterns, or that are otherwise likely to interest a broad international readership. Papers may focus on any aspect of vegetation science, e.g. community structure (including community assembly and plant functional types), biodiversity (including species richness and composition), spatial patterns (including plant geography and landscape ecology), temporal changes (including demography, community dynamics and palaeoecology) and processes (including ecophysiology), provided the focus is on increasing our understanding of plant communities. The Journal publishes papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities. Papers that apply ecological concepts, theories and methods to the vegetation management, conservation and restoration, and papers on vegetation survey should be directed to our associate journal, Applied Vegetation Science journal.
期刊最新文献
Role of Plant Specialists in Fine-Scale Diversity–Area Relationships (DARs) in Southern European Atlantic Coastal Dunes Willow above, changes below: Seedless tree invader impacts riparian seed bank in the Patagonian ecotone Repeat photography reveals long-term climate change impacts on sub-Antarctic tundra vegetation Mammalian herbivory alters structure, composition and edaphic conditions of a grey-dune community Short-term vegetation shifts in an alpine grassland under current and simulated climate change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1