用户对人工智能工作场所数字心理健康平台 "mindline at work "功能的看法和使用情况。

IF 4.4 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Health & Care Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045
Sungwon Yoon, Hendra Goh, Xinyi Casuarine Low, Janice Huiqin Weng, Creighton Heaukulani
{"title":"用户对人工智能工作场所数字心理健康平台 \"mindline at work \"功能的看法和使用情况。","authors":"Sungwon Yoon, Hendra Goh, Xinyi Casuarine Low, Janice Huiqin Weng, Creighton Heaukulani","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The working population encounters unique work-related stressors. Despite these challenges, accessibility to mental healthcare remains limited. Digital technology-enabled mental wellness tools can offer much-needed access to mental healthcare. However, existing literature has given limited attention to their relevance and user engagement, particularly for the working population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess user perceptions and feature utilisation of <i>mindline at work</i>, a nationally developed AI-enabled digital platform designed to improve mental wellness in the working population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopted a mixed-methods design comprising a survey (n=399) and semistructured interviews (n=40) with office-based working adults. Participants were asked to use <i>mindline at work</i> for 4 weeks. We collected data about utilisation of the platform features, intention for sustained use and perceptions of specific features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants under 5 years of work experience reported lower utilisation of multimedia resources but higher utilisation of emotion self-assessment tools and the AI chatbot compared with their counterparts (p<0.001). The platform received a moderate level of satisfaction (57%) and positive intention for sustained use (58%). Participants regarded <i>mindline at work</i> as an 'essential' safeguard against workplace stress, valuing its secure and non-judgmental space and user anonymity. However, they wanted greater institutional support for office workers' mental wellness to enhance the uptake. The AI chatbot was perceived as useful for self-reflection and problem-solving, despite limited maturity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying the unique benefits of specific features for different segments of working adults can foster a personalised user experience and promote mental well-being. Increasing workplace awareness is essential for platform adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331828/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User perceptions and utilisation of features of an AI-enabled workplace digital mental wellness platform 'mindline at work<i>'</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Sungwon Yoon, Hendra Goh, Xinyi Casuarine Low, Janice Huiqin Weng, Creighton Heaukulani\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The working population encounters unique work-related stressors. Despite these challenges, accessibility to mental healthcare remains limited. Digital technology-enabled mental wellness tools can offer much-needed access to mental healthcare. However, existing literature has given limited attention to their relevance and user engagement, particularly for the working population.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess user perceptions and feature utilisation of <i>mindline at work</i>, a nationally developed AI-enabled digital platform designed to improve mental wellness in the working population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study adopted a mixed-methods design comprising a survey (n=399) and semistructured interviews (n=40) with office-based working adults. Participants were asked to use <i>mindline at work</i> for 4 weeks. We collected data about utilisation of the platform features, intention for sustained use and perceptions of specific features.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants under 5 years of work experience reported lower utilisation of multimedia resources but higher utilisation of emotion self-assessment tools and the AI chatbot compared with their counterparts (p<0.001). The platform received a moderate level of satisfaction (57%) and positive intention for sustained use (58%). Participants regarded <i>mindline at work</i> as an 'essential' safeguard against workplace stress, valuing its secure and non-judgmental space and user anonymity. However, they wanted greater institutional support for office workers' mental wellness to enhance the uptake. The AI chatbot was perceived as useful for self-reflection and problem-solving, despite limited maturity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying the unique benefits of specific features for different segments of working adults can foster a personalised user experience and promote mental well-being. Increasing workplace awareness is essential for platform adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331828/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Health & Care Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业人群会遇到与工作相关的独特压力。尽管存在这些挑战,但获得心理保健的机会仍然有限。借助数字技术的心理健康工具可以提供亟需的心理保健服务。目的:本研究旨在评估用户对 "工作中的心灵热线"(mindline at work)的看法和使用情况,这是一个由国家开发的人工智能数字平台,旨在改善工作人群的心理健康:本研究采用混合方法设计,包括对办公室工作的成年人进行问卷调查(n=399)和半结构式访谈(n=40)。参与者被要求在工作中使用心灵热线 4 周。我们收集了有关平台功能的使用情况、持续使用的意向以及对特定功能的看法等数据:工作经验在 5 年以下的参与者对多媒体资源的使用率较低,但对情绪自我评估工具和人工智能聊天机器人的使用率较高,而工作经验在 5 年以上的参与者对多媒体资源的使用率较低,但对情绪自我评估工具和人工智能聊天机器人的使用率较高。不过,他们希望得到更多机构对上班族心理健康的支持,以提高使用率。尽管人工智能聊天机器人的成熟度有限,但他们认为它有助于自我反思和解决问题:针对不同的上班族群体,确定特定功能的独特益处,可以促进个性化的用户体验,提高心理健康水平。提高工作场所的认识对于平台的采用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User perceptions and utilisation of features of an AI-enabled workplace digital mental wellness platform 'mindline at work'.

Background: The working population encounters unique work-related stressors. Despite these challenges, accessibility to mental healthcare remains limited. Digital technology-enabled mental wellness tools can offer much-needed access to mental healthcare. However, existing literature has given limited attention to their relevance and user engagement, particularly for the working population.

Aim: This study aims to assess user perceptions and feature utilisation of mindline at work, a nationally developed AI-enabled digital platform designed to improve mental wellness in the working population.

Methods: This study adopted a mixed-methods design comprising a survey (n=399) and semistructured interviews (n=40) with office-based working adults. Participants were asked to use mindline at work for 4 weeks. We collected data about utilisation of the platform features, intention for sustained use and perceptions of specific features.

Results: Participants under 5 years of work experience reported lower utilisation of multimedia resources but higher utilisation of emotion self-assessment tools and the AI chatbot compared with their counterparts (p<0.001). The platform received a moderate level of satisfaction (57%) and positive intention for sustained use (58%). Participants regarded mindline at work as an 'essential' safeguard against workplace stress, valuing its secure and non-judgmental space and user anonymity. However, they wanted greater institutional support for office workers' mental wellness to enhance the uptake. The AI chatbot was perceived as useful for self-reflection and problem-solving, despite limited maturity.

Conclusion: Identifying the unique benefits of specific features for different segments of working adults can foster a personalised user experience and promote mental well-being. Increasing workplace awareness is essential for platform adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
AI-generated clinical summaries: errors and susceptibility to speech and speaker variability. Omission and hallucination prevalence of clinical guidelines in diagnostic large language model outputs. Does the accuracy of medication administration documentation improve with electronic medication systems? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. i-MoMCARE: AI-enabled mobile app for maternal and child health care in Cambodia - a pilot implementation and evaluation study. Barriers associated with the implementation, adoption, scale-up and sustainability of mHealth in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review guided by the NASSS Framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1