PAX1m/JAM3m 在非 16/18 型人类乳头瘤病毒阳性妇女宫颈癌机会性筛查中的分流效果:一项在中国进行的多中心前瞻性研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Clinical Epigenetics Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1186/s13148-024-01731-w
Xiaojing Chen, Xitong Jin, Linghua Kong, Yuligh Liou, Pei Liu, Zhe Dong, Sijun Zhou, Bingli Qi, Jing Fei, Xiaoyan Chen, Guangwu Xiong, Yuchong Hu, Shikai Liu, Jianwei Zhou, Huafeng Shou, Lei Li
{"title":"PAX1m/JAM3m 在非 16/18 型人类乳头瘤病毒阳性妇女宫颈癌机会性筛查中的分流效果:一项在中国进行的多中心前瞻性研究。","authors":"Xiaojing Chen, Xitong Jin, Linghua Kong, Yuligh Liou, Pei Liu, Zhe Dong, Sijun Zhou, Bingli Qi, Jing Fei, Xiaoyan Chen, Guangwu Xiong, Yuchong Hu, Shikai Liu, Jianwei Zhou, Huafeng Shou, Lei Li","doi":"10.1186/s13148-024-01731-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10366,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epigenetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triage performance of PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> in opportunistic cervical cancer screening of non‒16/18 human papillomavirus-positive women: a multicenter prospective study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojing Chen, Xitong Jin, Linghua Kong, Yuligh Liou, Pei Liu, Zhe Dong, Sijun Zhou, Bingli Qi, Jing Fei, Xiaoyan Chen, Guangwu Xiong, Yuchong Hu, Shikai Liu, Jianwei Zhou, Huafeng Shou, Lei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13148-024-01731-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup> was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1<sup>m</sup>/JAM3<sup>m</sup>(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330154/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epigenetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01731-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epigenetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-024-01731-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的在这项研究中,我们旨在验证PAX1和JAM3甲基化(PAX1m/JAM3m)检测作为一种分流工具在检测非16/18高危人乳头瘤病毒阳性(non-16/18 hrHPV +)患者宫颈上皮内瘤变3级或更差(CIN3 +)方面的性能:方法:比较液基细胞学(LBC)和PAX1m/JAM3m检测法检测CIN3 +的分流效果:结果:共有 1851 名参与者进行了宫颈组织学检查并纳入分析。LBC检测结果中意义未定或更差的非典型鳞状细胞(LBC≥ASCUS)和PAX1m/JAM3m检测结果的敏感性/特异性分别为90.1%/26.7%和84.8%/88.5%。在整个队列中,PAX1m/JAM3m( +)的诊断AUC最高(0.866,95%置信区间(CI)0.837-0.896)。PAX1m/JAM3m(+)检测出所有癌症(n = 20)。与 LBC ≥ ASCUS 相比,PAX1m/JAM3m(+) 使需要转诊进行阴道镜检查的患者人数减少了 57.21%(74.66% 对 17.45%)。通过LBC≥ASCUS和PAX1m/JAM3m(+)检测出CIN3 +的几率分别为3.3(95% CI 2.0-5.9)和42.6(27.1-69.6)(P m/JAM3m(+)略微提高了诊断灵敏度(98.0%,95% CI:95.8-100%)和转诊率(77.09%),但降低了诊断特异性(24.8%,22.7-26.8%):在非16/18 hrHPV(+)女性中,PAX1m/JAM3m在检测CIN3 +方面优于细胞学检查。与 LBC ≥ ASCUS 相比,PAX1m/JAM3m(+) 在不影响诊断灵敏度的情况下减少了大量转诊至阴道镜检查的人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Triage performance of PAX1m/JAM3m in opportunistic cervical cancer screening of non‒16/18 human papillomavirus-positive women: a multicenter prospective study in China.

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to validate the performance of the PAX1 and JAM3 methylation (PAX1m/JAM3m) test as a triage tool for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse (CIN3 +) in non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus-positive patients (non-16/18 hrHPV +).

Methods: The triage performance of liquid-based cytology (LBC) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test for detecting CIN3 + were compared.

Results: In total, 1851 participants had cervical histological outcomes and were included in the analysis. The sensitivity/specificity of the LBC test results with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (LBC ≥ ASCUS) and the PAX1m/JAM3m test were 90.1%/26.7% and 84.8%/88.5%, respectively. PAX1m/JAM3m( +) had the highest diagnostic AUC (0.866, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.837-0.896) in the whole cohort. All cancers (n = 20) were detected by PAX1m/JAM3m(+). Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of patients who needed referral for colposcopy by 57.21% (74.66% vs. 17.45%). The odds ratios for detecting CIN3 + by LBC ≥ ASCUS and PAX1m/JAM3m(+) were 3.3 (95% CI 2.0-5.9) and 42.6 (27.1-69.6), respectively (p < 0.001). The combination of LBC ≥ ASCUS or PAX1m/JAM3m(+) slightly increased the diagnostic sensitivity (98.0%, 95% CI: 95.8-100%) and referral rate (77.09%) but reduced the diagnostic specificity (24.8%, 22.7-26.8%).

Conclusions: In non-16/18 hrHPV(+) women, PAX1m/JAM3m was superior to cytology for detecting CIN3 + . Compared with LBC ≥ ASCUS, PAX1m/JAM3m(+) reduced the number of significant referrals to colposcopy without compromising diagnostic sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Clinical Epigenetics, the official journal of the Clinical Epigenetics Society, is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of epigenetic principles and mechanisms in relation to human disease, diagnosis and therapy. Clinical trials and research in disease model organisms are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Effects of multisuperovulation on the transcription and genomic methylation of oocytes and offspring. Causal effects of cardiovascular health on five epigenetic clocks. Causal association of epigenetic age acceleration and risk of subacute thyroiditis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study Technical and biological sources of unreliability of Infinium probes on Illumina methylation microarrays Methylation alterations of imprinted genes in different placental diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1