"影响根治性膀胱切除术后再入院模式的因素:对社会决定因素和出院结果的分析"。

Valentina Grajales M.D., M.S. , Jonathan Y. Lin M.S. , Danielle Sharbaugh M.P.H. , Maria Pere M.D. , Adam Sharbaugh M.D. , David T. Miller M.D. , Dan Pelzman M.D. , ZhaoJun Sun Ph.D., M.S. , Kirsten Y. Eom M.P.H. , Benjamin J. Davies M.D. , Jonathan G. Yabes Ph.D. , Lindsay M. Sabik Ph.D. , Bruce L. Jacobs M.D., M.P.H.
{"title":"\"影响根治性膀胱切除术后再入院模式的因素:对社会决定因素和出院结果的分析\"。","authors":"Valentina Grajales M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Jonathan Y. Lin M.S. ,&nbsp;Danielle Sharbaugh M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Maria Pere M.D. ,&nbsp;Adam Sharbaugh M.D. ,&nbsp;David T. Miller M.D. ,&nbsp;Dan Pelzman M.D. ,&nbsp;ZhaoJun Sun Ph.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Kirsten Y. Eom M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Davies M.D. ,&nbsp;Jonathan G. Yabes Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Sabik Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Bruce L. Jacobs M.D., M.P.H.","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Radical cystectomy readmission rates remain high, with around 25% of patients readmitted to index and nonindex hospitals in 30 days. Nonindex readmissions have been associated with poorer outcomes, including longer lengths of stay and higher mortality rates. This study aimed to examine the associations of social factors (e.g., sex, race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, and resident location) on readmission to index versus nonindex hospitals and discharge disposition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a population-based retrospective study using the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR) to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy in Pennsylvania between 2010 and 2018. Readmitted patients were identified using the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council data (PHC4). The primary outcome was readmission location (i.e., index or nonindex hospital) following radical cystectomy. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, multivariable logistic regression model to assess predictors of being readmitted to an index hospital and calculating the predicted probability of being admitted to an index hospital depending on discharge disposition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 517 patients were readmitted within 30-days after radical cystectomy. The majority of readmissions were index readmissions (83%). Median readmission hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4) for index and 5 days (IQR 7) for nonindex hospitals, <em>P</em> = 0.01. Patients readmitted to index hospitals had fewer comorbidities (median weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index 2 (IQR 2)) and lived in urban areas (89%). Discharge with home care was associated with a higher odds of index readmission (odds ratio, [OR] 2.40; 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.25–4.52).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients residing in urban areas and with fewer comorbidities were more likely to be readmitted to index hospitals than nonindex hospitals. Socioeconomic status and insurance type did not correlate with the type of readmission. Finally, being discharged with home health care was found to be a predictor of readmission to an index hospital.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":"42 12","pages":"Pages 449.e13-449.e19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing readmission patterns following radical cystectomy: An analysis of social determinants and discharge outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Grajales M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Jonathan Y. Lin M.S. ,&nbsp;Danielle Sharbaugh M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Maria Pere M.D. ,&nbsp;Adam Sharbaugh M.D. ,&nbsp;David T. Miller M.D. ,&nbsp;Dan Pelzman M.D. ,&nbsp;ZhaoJun Sun Ph.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Kirsten Y. Eom M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Davies M.D. ,&nbsp;Jonathan G. Yabes Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Lindsay M. Sabik Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Bruce L. Jacobs M.D., M.P.H.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><div>Radical cystectomy readmission rates remain high, with around 25% of patients readmitted to index and nonindex hospitals in 30 days. Nonindex readmissions have been associated with poorer outcomes, including longer lengths of stay and higher mortality rates. This study aimed to examine the associations of social factors (e.g., sex, race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, and resident location) on readmission to index versus nonindex hospitals and discharge disposition.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a population-based retrospective study using the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR) to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy in Pennsylvania between 2010 and 2018. Readmitted patients were identified using the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council data (PHC4). The primary outcome was readmission location (i.e., index or nonindex hospital) following radical cystectomy. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, multivariable logistic regression model to assess predictors of being readmitted to an index hospital and calculating the predicted probability of being admitted to an index hospital depending on discharge disposition.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 517 patients were readmitted within 30-days after radical cystectomy. The majority of readmissions were index readmissions (83%). Median readmission hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4) for index and 5 days (IQR 7) for nonindex hospitals, <em>P</em> = 0.01. Patients readmitted to index hospitals had fewer comorbidities (median weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index 2 (IQR 2)) and lived in urban areas (89%). Discharge with home care was associated with a higher odds of index readmission (odds ratio, [OR] 2.40; 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.25–4.52).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients residing in urban areas and with fewer comorbidities were more likely to be readmitted to index hospitals than nonindex hospitals. Socioeconomic status and insurance type did not correlate with the type of readmission. Finally, being discharged with home health care was found to be a predictor of readmission to an index hospital.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\"42 12\",\"pages\":\"Pages 449.e13-449.e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924005118\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078143924005118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目标:根治性膀胱切除术的再入院率仍然很高,约有 25% 的患者在 30 天内再次入院到指标医院和非指标医院。非指标再入院与较差的治疗效果有关,包括较长的住院时间和较高的死亡率。本研究旨在探讨社会因素(如性别、种族、社会经济地位、保险类型和居住地)与再入指标医院和非指标医院以及出院处置之间的关联:我们利用宾夕法尼亚州癌症登记处(PCR)开展了一项基于人群的回顾性研究,以确定2010年至2018年间在宾夕法尼亚州接受根治性膀胱切除术的非转移性肌浸润性膀胱癌患者。再入院患者通过宾夕法尼亚州医疗成本控制委员会数据(PHC4)确定。主要结果是根治性膀胱切除术后的再入院地点(即指数医院或非指数医院)。我们对分类变量采用卡方检验,对连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估再次入院的预测因素,并根据出院处置计算再次入院的预测概率:共有517名患者在根治性膀胱切除术后30天内再次入院。大多数再入院患者都是指数再入院(83%)。指标医院再入院住院时间中位数为 4 天(四分位数间距 [IQR] 4),非指标医院为 5 天(IQR 7),P = 0.01。再次入住指标医院的患者合并症较少(中位数加权Elixhauser合并症指数为2(IQR为2)),且居住在城市地区(89%)。出院时接受家庭护理的患者再次入院的几率更高(几率比[OR]2.40;95%置信区间[CI]1.25-4.52):结论:与非指标医院相比,居住在城市地区且合并症较少的患者更有可能再次入住指标医院。社会经济地位和保险类型与再入院类型无关。最后,出院时接受家庭医疗服务也是再次入住指数医院的一个预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing readmission patterns following radical cystectomy: An analysis of social determinants and discharge outcomes

Introduction and objectives

Radical cystectomy readmission rates remain high, with around 25% of patients readmitted to index and nonindex hospitals in 30 days. Nonindex readmissions have been associated with poorer outcomes, including longer lengths of stay and higher mortality rates. This study aimed to examine the associations of social factors (e.g., sex, race, socioeconomic status, insurance type, and resident location) on readmission to index versus nonindex hospitals and discharge disposition.

Methods

We conducted a population-based retrospective study using the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR) to identify patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy in Pennsylvania between 2010 and 2018. Readmitted patients were identified using the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council data (PHC4). The primary outcome was readmission location (i.e., index or nonindex hospital) following radical cystectomy. We used chi-square tests for categorical variables, Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables, multivariable logistic regression model to assess predictors of being readmitted to an index hospital and calculating the predicted probability of being admitted to an index hospital depending on discharge disposition.

Results

A total of 517 patients were readmitted within 30-days after radical cystectomy. The majority of readmissions were index readmissions (83%). Median readmission hospital stay was 4 days (interquartile range [IQR] 4) for index and 5 days (IQR 7) for nonindex hospitals, P = 0.01. Patients readmitted to index hospitals had fewer comorbidities (median weighted Elixhauser Comorbidity Index 2 (IQR 2)) and lived in urban areas (89%). Discharge with home care was associated with a higher odds of index readmission (odds ratio, [OR] 2.40; 95% confidence interval, [CI] 1.25–4.52).

Conclusions

Patients residing in urban areas and with fewer comorbidities were more likely to be readmitted to index hospitals than nonindex hospitals. Socioeconomic status and insurance type did not correlate with the type of readmission. Finally, being discharged with home health care was found to be a predictor of readmission to an index hospital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
期刊最新文献
State of the Art: The Microbiome in Bladder Cancer. Corrigendum to "A 2-center review of histopathology of variants of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and their impact on clinical outcomes" [Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations Volume 42 (2024) 333.e15-333.e20]. Laparoscopic suture-free partial nephrectomy using argon-beam-coagulator: Surgical technique and outcomes of a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1