强脉冲光治疗红斑痤疮的有效性和安全性:系统综述。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022
Cintia Cristina Santi Martignago, Mirian Bonifacio, Laura Takahashi Ascimann, Patricia Gabrielli Vassão, Julia Risso Parisi, Ana Paula Renno, Livia Assis Garcia, Daniel Araki Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno
{"title":"强脉冲光治疗红斑痤疮的有效性和安全性:系统综述。","authors":"Cintia Cristina Santi Martignago, Mirian Bonifacio, Laura Takahashi Ascimann, Patricia Gabrielli Vassão, Julia Risso Parisi, Ana Paula Renno, Livia Assis Garcia, Daniel Araki Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno","doi":"10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":50376,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Cintia Cristina Santi Martignago, Mirian Bonifacio, Laura Takahashi Ascimann, Patricia Gabrielli Vassão, Julia Risso Parisi, Ana Paula Renno, Livia Assis Garcia, Daniel Araki Ribeiro, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_1029_2022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 红斑痤疮是一种慢性皮肤炎症性疾病,以面部红斑、水肿、毛细血管扩张、丘疹、脓疱和结节为特征。目前,治疗酒糟鼻的有效方法还很少。强脉冲光(IPL)是一种将闪光灯安装在带反射镜的光学治疗设备(头部或尖端)上的方法,近来在治疗酒糟鼻方面越来越受欢迎。目的 本系统综述旨在评估 IPL 治疗酒糟鼻的疗效、安全性和不良反应。方法 本系统性综述按照《系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)进行。检索的电子数据库包括 Medline、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库。采用非随机干预研究偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)和随机试验偏倚风险工具(RoB-2)评估偏倚风险。结果 在 Medline、Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中检索到的 233 篇文章中,有 14 项研究符合最终分析条件。这些研究纳入了菲茨帕特里克Ⅰ型至Ⅳ型皮肤的患者,他们的年龄从 15 岁到 78 岁不等。虽然所纳入的研究在使用的参数方面存在异质性,但大多数研究都表明 IPL 治疗对红斑痤疮毛细血管扩张和红斑有积极的作用,而且所出现的不良反应是暂时的。局限性 纳入研究的方法质量不高。结论 尽管大多数研究显示强脉冲光对治疗酒糟鼻有疗效,但研究质量不高令人担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of intense pulsed light in rosacea: A systematic review.

Background Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin characterised by facial erythema, oedema, telangiectasias, papules, pustules and nodules. There is a paucity of effective therapeutic modalities for the management of rosacea. Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), a modality in which flash lamps installed in an optical treatment device (head or tip) with mirrors to reflect light, has in recent times gained popularity in the management of this condition. Aim This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety and adverse effects of IPL treatment for rosacea. Methods This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The electronic databases searched were Medline, PubMed and Scopus databases. The Risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) and risk-of-bias tools for randomised trials (RoB-2) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Of a total of 233 articles retrieved from Medline, Scopus and PubMed databases, 14 studies qualified for final analysis. The studies included patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I to IV, with ages ranging from 15 to 78 years. Although the included studies showed heterogeneity between the parameters used, most studies demonstrated positive effects of IPL treatment on telangiectasia and erythema in rosacea and that the adverse effects presented were transitory. Limitation The methodological quality of the included studies was poor. Conclusion Although most studies showed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of rosacea, the poor quality of the studies was of concern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists & Leprologists (IADVL) is the national association of Indian medical specialists who manage patients with skin disorders, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or leprosy. The current member strength of the association is about 3800. The association works for the betterment of the specialty by holding academic meetings, printing a journal and publishing a textbook. The IADVL has several state branches, each with their own office bearers, which function independently within the constitution of the IADVL. Established in 1940, the Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology (IJDVL, ISSN 0378-6323) is the official publication of the IADVL (Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists).
期刊最新文献
Neonatal lupus erythematosus presenting as raccoon eyes. Paradoxical eczema in psoriasis patients following treatment with secukinumab. High-frequency ultrasonography for the detection of subclinical arthritis in chronic plaque psoriasis patients - A cross-sectional study. Therapeutic agents for Hailey-Hailey disease: A narrative review. Acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis secondary to spider bite.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1