Brett R. Curtis MD, MS, Shuo Tian PhD, Sachita Shrestha MPH, Trevor Denton DPT, Blake Haller MD, Jonathan Sebolt MD, Michael Adams MD, Stephanie P. Taylor MD, MSc, David Paje MD, MPH
{"title":"一家学术医疗中心的住院医生医疗程序服务与运营效率的关联。","authors":"Brett R. Curtis MD, MS, Shuo Tian PhD, Sachita Shrestha MPH, Trevor Denton DPT, Blake Haller MD, Jonathan Sebolt MD, Michael Adams MD, Stephanie P. Taylor MD, MSc, David Paje MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examined the impact of a hospital medicine medical procedure service (MPS) on hospital length of stay (LOS), postprocedure LOS, and completion of procedures on weekends. We included 4952 patients admitted to our large academic hospital between July 1, 2021 and July 31, 2023 who underwent thoracentesis, paracentesis, or lumbar puncture (LP). MPS performed 30% (1499) of these procedures. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score, and procedure type, procedure performance by MPS was associated with a shorter total hospital LOS (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.99) and postprocedure LOS (IRR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76–0.88). Also, MPS-performed procedures were twice as likely to occur on weekends compared to non-MPS-performed procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.75–2.41). These findings support the beneficial impact of MPS on operational efficiency, an important outcome for both patients and hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"19 12","pages":"1155-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13484","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of hospitalist medical procedure service with operational efficiency at an academic medical center\",\"authors\":\"Brett R. Curtis MD, MS, Shuo Tian PhD, Sachita Shrestha MPH, Trevor Denton DPT, Blake Haller MD, Jonathan Sebolt MD, Michael Adams MD, Stephanie P. Taylor MD, MSc, David Paje MD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We examined the impact of a hospital medicine medical procedure service (MPS) on hospital length of stay (LOS), postprocedure LOS, and completion of procedures on weekends. We included 4952 patients admitted to our large academic hospital between July 1, 2021 and July 31, 2023 who underwent thoracentesis, paracentesis, or lumbar puncture (LP). MPS performed 30% (1499) of these procedures. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score, and procedure type, procedure performance by MPS was associated with a shorter total hospital LOS (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.99) and postprocedure LOS (IRR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76–0.88). Also, MPS-performed procedures were twice as likely to occur on weekends compared to non-MPS-performed procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.75–2.41). These findings support the beneficial impact of MPS on operational efficiency, an important outcome for both patients and hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"19 12\",\"pages\":\"1155-1159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13484\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13484\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13484","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The association of hospitalist medical procedure service with operational efficiency at an academic medical center
We examined the impact of a hospital medicine medical procedure service (MPS) on hospital length of stay (LOS), postprocedure LOS, and completion of procedures on weekends. We included 4952 patients admitted to our large academic hospital between July 1, 2021 and July 31, 2023 who underwent thoracentesis, paracentesis, or lumbar puncture (LP). MPS performed 30% (1499) of these procedures. After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity score, and procedure type, procedure performance by MPS was associated with a shorter total hospital LOS (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87–0.99) and postprocedure LOS (IRR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76–0.88). Also, MPS-performed procedures were twice as likely to occur on weekends compared to non-MPS-performed procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.75–2.41). These findings support the beneficial impact of MPS on operational efficiency, an important outcome for both patients and hospitals.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.