校外学习活动对学生成绩的短期和长期影响:混合研究综述

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100628
{"title":"校外学习活动对学生成绩的短期和长期影响:混合研究综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This mixed-research synthesis examined the short and long-term effects of out-of-school learning (OSL) activities on student achievement and factors affecting these practices. Initially, two meta-analytic reviews examined the short and long-term effects of OSL practices on student achievement under a random-effects model. Then, a thematic synthesis of primary qualitative studies explored the pedagogical factors affecting OSL practices. Finally, results from both phases were integrated through a cross-study synthesis. The study found that OSL significantly improves student achievement, <em>g</em> = 1.062, 95<em>%</em> CI [0.930, 1.194], and achievement retention, <em>g</em> = 1.033, 95<em>%</em> CI [0.759, 1.307]. However, there were considerable within and between-study heterogeneities. The moderator variables of country, discipline area, intervention length, and grade levels significantly contributed to effect size variability in one or both meta-analyses. The thematic synthesis revealed many pedagogical factors and implications that needed consideration when planning for, implementing, and finalizing OSL. Interventions matching the implications drawn from the primary qualitative studies had statistically significant effects on student outcomes in many cases. The study concluded by discussing major findings, conclusions, and implications for future research, teachers, and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short and long-term effects of out-of-school learning activities on student achievement: A mixed-research synthesis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This mixed-research synthesis examined the short and long-term effects of out-of-school learning (OSL) activities on student achievement and factors affecting these practices. Initially, two meta-analytic reviews examined the short and long-term effects of OSL practices on student achievement under a random-effects model. Then, a thematic synthesis of primary qualitative studies explored the pedagogical factors affecting OSL practices. Finally, results from both phases were integrated through a cross-study synthesis. The study found that OSL significantly improves student achievement, <em>g</em> = 1.062, 95<em>%</em> CI [0.930, 1.194], and achievement retention, <em>g</em> = 1.033, 95<em>%</em> CI [0.759, 1.307]. However, there were considerable within and between-study heterogeneities. The moderator variables of country, discipline area, intervention length, and grade levels significantly contributed to effect size variability in one or both meta-analyses. The thematic synthesis revealed many pedagogical factors and implications that needed consideration when planning for, implementing, and finalizing OSL. Interventions matching the implications drawn from the primary qualitative studies had statistically significant effects on student outcomes in many cases. The study concluded by discussing major findings, conclusions, and implications for future research, teachers, and policymakers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2400037X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X2400037X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项混合研究综述考察了校外学习(OSL)活动对学生成绩的短期和长期影响,以及影响这些活动的因素。首先,在随机效应模型下,两篇荟萃分析综述考察了校外学习活动对学生成绩的短期和长期影响。然后,对主要定性研究进行了专题综合,探讨了影响职业英语学习实践的教学因素。最后,通过交叉研究综述对两个阶段的结果进行了整合。研究发现,OSL 显著提高了学生的成绩(g = 1.062,95% CI [0.930,1.194])和成绩保持率(g = 1.033,95% CI [0.759,1.307])。然而,研究内部和研究之间存在相当大的异质性。在一项或两项荟萃分析中,国家、学科领域、干预时间长短和年级等调节变量对效应大小的变化有显著影响。专题综述揭示了在规划、实施和最终确定 OSL 时需要考虑的许多教学因素和影响。在许多情况下,与从主要定性研究中得出的影响相匹配的干预措施对学生的学习成绩有显著的统计学影响。研究最后讨论了主要发现、结论以及对未来研究、教师和政策制定者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Short and long-term effects of out-of-school learning activities on student achievement: A mixed-research synthesis

This mixed-research synthesis examined the short and long-term effects of out-of-school learning (OSL) activities on student achievement and factors affecting these practices. Initially, two meta-analytic reviews examined the short and long-term effects of OSL practices on student achievement under a random-effects model. Then, a thematic synthesis of primary qualitative studies explored the pedagogical factors affecting OSL practices. Finally, results from both phases were integrated through a cross-study synthesis. The study found that OSL significantly improves student achievement, g = 1.062, 95% CI [0.930, 1.194], and achievement retention, g = 1.033, 95% CI [0.759, 1.307]. However, there were considerable within and between-study heterogeneities. The moderator variables of country, discipline area, intervention length, and grade levels significantly contributed to effect size variability in one or both meta-analyses. The thematic synthesis revealed many pedagogical factors and implications that needed consideration when planning for, implementing, and finalizing OSL. Interventions matching the implications drawn from the primary qualitative studies had statistically significant effects on student outcomes in many cases. The study concluded by discussing major findings, conclusions, and implications for future research, teachers, and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between teacher talk and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis Self-regulated learning strategies in continuing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis The effect of teacher training programs on pre-service and in-service teachers’ global competence: A meta-analysis Editorial Board What can Implementation Science tell us about scaling interventions in school settings? A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1