抗凝不足和高尿酸血症导致血小板丰富血浆注射后膝关节疼痛:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1177/10225536241277604
Yang Chen, Hongxun Sang, Song Wu, Haobin Zhang, Yi Zhang, Hongxing Li
{"title":"抗凝不足和高尿酸血症导致血小板丰富血浆注射后膝关节疼痛:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Yang Chen, Hongxun Sang, Song Wu, Haobin Zhang, Yi Zhang, Hongxing Li","doi":"10.1177/10225536241277604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma treatment delays the need for total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, its use and preparation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma and post-treatment pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and identified other factors that may affect treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 225 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent knee platelet-rich plasma treatment from June 2021 to January 2022, were examined at three study centres. Patients were categorised, based on the type and amount of anticoagulant used during platelet-rich plasma preparation, into 4% sodium citrate (SC) 0.6 mL, 4% SC 1 mL, 4% SC 2 mL, heparin 0.1 mL, and heparin 0.2 mL groups. We analysed the patients' basic information, pain after treatment, and inflammatory markers (i.e., interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor-α, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein) in the joint fluid via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and joint fluid crystallisation. Additionally, we assessed the patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University scores and minimal clinically significant differences after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the 4% SC 0.6 mL and heparin 0.1 mL groups experienced less pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment than did patients in the high-dose anticoagulant group. The joint fluid of patients with pain in these groups had lower levels of inflammatory markers. Patients treated with SC had slightly better medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes than did patients treated with heparin. Patients with poorly controlled hyperuricemia also experienced pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that platelet-rich plasma prepared using high-dose anticoagulants or administered to patients with poorly controlled hyperuricaemia may lead to moderate-to-severe knee pain and joint effusion after joint puncture therapy. Platelet-rich plasma had a therapeutic effect on knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy gradually decreased over time. SC anticoagulant is more suitable for platelet-rich plasma preparation than is heparin. Further studies are needed to understand the safety and the various factors influencing platelet-rich plasma therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"32 2","pages":"10225536241277604"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inadequate anticoagulation and hyperuricemia cause knee pain after platelet-rich plasma injection: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Chen, Hongxun Sang, Song Wu, Haobin Zhang, Yi Zhang, Hongxing Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536241277604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Platelet-rich plasma treatment delays the need for total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, its use and preparation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma and post-treatment pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and identified other factors that may affect treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 225 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent knee platelet-rich plasma treatment from June 2021 to January 2022, were examined at three study centres. Patients were categorised, based on the type and amount of anticoagulant used during platelet-rich plasma preparation, into 4% sodium citrate (SC) 0.6 mL, 4% SC 1 mL, 4% SC 2 mL, heparin 0.1 mL, and heparin 0.2 mL groups. We analysed the patients' basic information, pain after treatment, and inflammatory markers (i.e., interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor-α, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein) in the joint fluid via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and joint fluid crystallisation. Additionally, we assessed the patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University scores and minimal clinically significant differences after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the 4% SC 0.6 mL and heparin 0.1 mL groups experienced less pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment than did patients in the high-dose anticoagulant group. The joint fluid of patients with pain in these groups had lower levels of inflammatory markers. Patients treated with SC had slightly better medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes than did patients treated with heparin. Patients with poorly controlled hyperuricemia also experienced pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggest that platelet-rich plasma prepared using high-dose anticoagulants or administered to patients with poorly controlled hyperuricaemia may lead to moderate-to-severe knee pain and joint effusion after joint puncture therapy. Platelet-rich plasma had a therapeutic effect on knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy gradually decreased over time. SC anticoagulant is more suitable for platelet-rich plasma preparation than is heparin. Further studies are needed to understand the safety and the various factors influencing platelet-rich plasma therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 2\",\"pages\":\"10225536241277604\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241277604\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536241277604","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:富血小板血浆治疗可延缓膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行全膝关节置换术的需要。然而,其使用和制备仍存在争议。本研究旨在调查富血小板血浆制备过程中抗凝剂的使用与膝骨关节炎患者治疗后疼痛之间的关系。此外,我们还探讨了富血小板血浆在中长期随访期间的疗效,并确定了可能影响治疗效果的其他因素:在这项回顾性研究中,三个研究中心对 2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月期间接受膝关节富血小板血浆治疗的 225 名膝关节骨关节炎患者进行了检查。根据制备富血小板血浆时使用的抗凝剂类型和用量,将患者分为 4% 枸橼酸钠(SC)0.6 mL 组、4% SC 1 mL 组、4% SC 2 mL 组、肝素 0.1 mL 组和肝素 0.2 mL 组。我们分析了患者的基本信息、治疗后的疼痛情况,并通过酶联免疫吸附试验和关节液结晶分析了关节液中的炎症标志物(即白细胞介素 6、肿瘤坏死因子-α 和超敏 C 反应蛋白)。此外,我们还评估了患者的西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学评分以及治疗后的最小临床显著差异:结果:与大剂量抗凝剂组相比,4% SC 0.6 mL 组和肝素 0.1 mL 组患者在富血小板血浆治疗后的疼痛程度较轻。这两组疼痛患者的关节液中炎症标志物水平较低。接受富血小板血浆治疗的患者的中长期疗效略好于接受肝素治疗的患者。高尿酸血症控制不佳的患者在接受富血小板血浆治疗后也会出现疼痛:结果表明,使用大剂量抗凝剂制备富血小板血浆或给高尿酸血症控制不佳的患者注射富血小板血浆,可能会导致关节穿刺治疗后出现中度至重度膝关节疼痛和关节积液。富血小板血浆对膝关节骨关节炎有一定的治疗效果,但随着时间的推移,其疗效逐渐下降。与肝素相比,SC 抗凝剂更适合用于制备富血小板血浆。要了解富血小板血浆疗法的安全性和各种影响因素,还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inadequate anticoagulation and hyperuricemia cause knee pain after platelet-rich plasma injection: A retrospective study.

Objectives: Platelet-rich plasma treatment delays the need for total knee replacement in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, its use and preparation remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use in the preparation of platelet-rich plasma and post-treatment pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Additionally, we explored the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma over medium- and long-term follow-up periods and identified other factors that may affect treatment outcomes.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 225 patients with knee osteoarthritis, who underwent knee platelet-rich plasma treatment from June 2021 to January 2022, were examined at three study centres. Patients were categorised, based on the type and amount of anticoagulant used during platelet-rich plasma preparation, into 4% sodium citrate (SC) 0.6 mL, 4% SC 1 mL, 4% SC 2 mL, heparin 0.1 mL, and heparin 0.2 mL groups. We analysed the patients' basic information, pain after treatment, and inflammatory markers (i.e., interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor-α, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein) in the joint fluid via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and joint fluid crystallisation. Additionally, we assessed the patients' Western Ontario and McMaster University scores and minimal clinically significant differences after treatment.

Results: Patients in the 4% SC 0.6 mL and heparin 0.1 mL groups experienced less pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment than did patients in the high-dose anticoagulant group. The joint fluid of patients with pain in these groups had lower levels of inflammatory markers. Patients treated with SC had slightly better medium- and long-term therapeutic outcomes than did patients treated with heparin. Patients with poorly controlled hyperuricemia also experienced pain after platelet-rich plasma treatment.

Conclusions: The results suggest that platelet-rich plasma prepared using high-dose anticoagulants or administered to patients with poorly controlled hyperuricaemia may lead to moderate-to-severe knee pain and joint effusion after joint puncture therapy. Platelet-rich plasma had a therapeutic effect on knee osteoarthritis; however, its efficacy gradually decreased over time. SC anticoagulant is more suitable for platelet-rich plasma preparation than is heparin. Further studies are needed to understand the safety and the various factors influencing platelet-rich plasma therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis after one- and two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anxiety and depression as risk factors for postoperative complications and pain in lumbar spine surgery: A national database study Imaging evaluation of extraarticular posterior loose bodies in varus ankle osteoarthritis Oblique sliding ulna osteotomy to treat paediatric neglected monteggia fracture dislocation. Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1