Reba L Colin, Jessica L Sperber, Kassidy K Buse, Paul J Kononoff, Andrea K Watson, Galen E Erickson
{"title":"藻类饲料添加剂对减少牛的肠道甲烷排放的影响。","authors":"Reba L Colin, Jessica L Sperber, Kassidy K Buse, Paul J Kononoff, Andrea K Watson, Galen E Erickson","doi":"10.1093/tas/txae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alga 1.0, a product containing bromoform, was fed to cattle to evaluate its effects on methane (<b>CH</b> <sub><b>4</b></sub> ) and carbon dioxide (<b>CO</b> <sub><b>2</b></sub> ) emissions and diet digestibility. Twelve nonlactating, nonpregnant Jersey cows (490 ± 19 kg body weight) were used in four replicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with three periods, each consisting of 21 d. Cows were blocked by feed intake (averaged intakes over 4 wk prior to trial) and assigned randomly to one of three treatments. Treatments included Alga 1.0 fed at 0, 69, and 103 g/d in a 0.454 kg/d dry matter (<b>DM</b>) top-dress daily in a modified distillers grains plus solubles (<b>MDGS</b>) carrier. Diet consisted of 60% dry-rolled corn, 20% corn silage, 15% modified distillers grains, and 5% supplement (DM basis). Headbox-style indirect calorimeters were utilized to evaluate gas production from individual cows with two nonconsecutive 23-h collections in each period. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with cow within square as experimental unit and as a random effect, and treatment and period as fixed effects. Linear and quadratic contrasts were used to compare treatments. Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced dry matter intake (<b>DMI</b>, <i>P</i> < 0.01) by 10.1% for 69 g/d inclusion and 13.3% for 103 g/d inclusion compared to the control. Nutrient intakes decreased linearly (<i>P</i> < 0.01) due to lower DMI, but nutrient digestibility was not impacted (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.28). Inclusion of Alga 1.0 did not impact gross energy or digestible energy concentration of the diets expressed as Mcal/kg DM (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.22) but did linearly reduce energy intake (Mcal/d; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions measured as g/kg DMI (<i>P</i> < 0.01) by 39 and 64% for 69 g/d and 103 g/d inclusion, respectively. Linear reductions (<i>P</i> < 0.01) of 64% to 65% were also observed in enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions when expressed per kilogram of DM or organic matter digested. Respired CO<sub>2</sub> as g/d linearly decreased (<i>P</i> = 0.03) for cattle fed Alga 1.0 but did not differ when expressed as g/kg of DMI (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.23). Oxygen consumption did not differ between treatments for g/d and g/kg DMI (<i>P </i>≥ 0.19). In conclusion, feeding Alga 1.0 reduced DMI up to 13.3%, did not impact digestibility, and significantly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions up to 63%.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"8 ","pages":"txae109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of an algae feed additive on reducing enteric methane emissions from cattle.\",\"authors\":\"Reba L Colin, Jessica L Sperber, Kassidy K Buse, Paul J Kononoff, Andrea K Watson, Galen E Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txae109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Alga 1.0, a product containing bromoform, was fed to cattle to evaluate its effects on methane (<b>CH</b> <sub><b>4</b></sub> ) and carbon dioxide (<b>CO</b> <sub><b>2</b></sub> ) emissions and diet digestibility. Twelve nonlactating, nonpregnant Jersey cows (490 ± 19 kg body weight) were used in four replicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with three periods, each consisting of 21 d. Cows were blocked by feed intake (averaged intakes over 4 wk prior to trial) and assigned randomly to one of three treatments. Treatments included Alga 1.0 fed at 0, 69, and 103 g/d in a 0.454 kg/d dry matter (<b>DM</b>) top-dress daily in a modified distillers grains plus solubles (<b>MDGS</b>) carrier. Diet consisted of 60% dry-rolled corn, 20% corn silage, 15% modified distillers grains, and 5% supplement (DM basis). Headbox-style indirect calorimeters were utilized to evaluate gas production from individual cows with two nonconsecutive 23-h collections in each period. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with cow within square as experimental unit and as a random effect, and treatment and period as fixed effects. Linear and quadratic contrasts were used to compare treatments. Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced dry matter intake (<b>DMI</b>, <i>P</i> < 0.01) by 10.1% for 69 g/d inclusion and 13.3% for 103 g/d inclusion compared to the control. Nutrient intakes decreased linearly (<i>P</i> < 0.01) due to lower DMI, but nutrient digestibility was not impacted (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.28). Inclusion of Alga 1.0 did not impact gross energy or digestible energy concentration of the diets expressed as Mcal/kg DM (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.22) but did linearly reduce energy intake (Mcal/d; <i>P</i> < 0.01). Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions measured as g/kg DMI (<i>P</i> < 0.01) by 39 and 64% for 69 g/d and 103 g/d inclusion, respectively. Linear reductions (<i>P</i> < 0.01) of 64% to 65% were also observed in enteric CH<sub>4</sub> emissions when expressed per kilogram of DM or organic matter digested. Respired CO<sub>2</sub> as g/d linearly decreased (<i>P</i> = 0.03) for cattle fed Alga 1.0 but did not differ when expressed as g/kg of DMI (<i>P</i> ≥ 0.23). Oxygen consumption did not differ between treatments for g/d and g/kg DMI (<i>P </i>≥ 0.19). In conclusion, feeding Alga 1.0 reduced DMI up to 13.3%, did not impact digestibility, and significantly reduced CH<sub>4</sub> emissions up to 63%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"txae109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329799/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of an algae feed additive on reducing enteric methane emissions from cattle.
Alga 1.0, a product containing bromoform, was fed to cattle to evaluate its effects on methane (CH4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions and diet digestibility. Twelve nonlactating, nonpregnant Jersey cows (490 ± 19 kg body weight) were used in four replicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with three periods, each consisting of 21 d. Cows were blocked by feed intake (averaged intakes over 4 wk prior to trial) and assigned randomly to one of three treatments. Treatments included Alga 1.0 fed at 0, 69, and 103 g/d in a 0.454 kg/d dry matter (DM) top-dress daily in a modified distillers grains plus solubles (MDGS) carrier. Diet consisted of 60% dry-rolled corn, 20% corn silage, 15% modified distillers grains, and 5% supplement (DM basis). Headbox-style indirect calorimeters were utilized to evaluate gas production from individual cows with two nonconsecutive 23-h collections in each period. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with cow within square as experimental unit and as a random effect, and treatment and period as fixed effects. Linear and quadratic contrasts were used to compare treatments. Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced dry matter intake (DMI, P < 0.01) by 10.1% for 69 g/d inclusion and 13.3% for 103 g/d inclusion compared to the control. Nutrient intakes decreased linearly (P < 0.01) due to lower DMI, but nutrient digestibility was not impacted (P ≥ 0.28). Inclusion of Alga 1.0 did not impact gross energy or digestible energy concentration of the diets expressed as Mcal/kg DM (P ≥ 0.22) but did linearly reduce energy intake (Mcal/d; P < 0.01). Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced enteric CH4 emissions measured as g/kg DMI (P < 0.01) by 39 and 64% for 69 g/d and 103 g/d inclusion, respectively. Linear reductions (P < 0.01) of 64% to 65% were also observed in enteric CH4 emissions when expressed per kilogram of DM or organic matter digested. Respired CO2 as g/d linearly decreased (P = 0.03) for cattle fed Alga 1.0 but did not differ when expressed as g/kg of DMI (P ≥ 0.23). Oxygen consumption did not differ between treatments for g/d and g/kg DMI (P ≥ 0.19). In conclusion, feeding Alga 1.0 reduced DMI up to 13.3%, did not impact digestibility, and significantly reduced CH4 emissions up to 63%.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.