Muhammad Umar Qayyum, Ahmed Ali Keerio, Ramsha Zaheer, Usman Mushtaq, Verda Baig, Raza Hussain, Muhammad Faisal
{"title":"头颈部癌症患者下颌骨皮瓣重建术的肿瘤安全性:扩展随访研究","authors":"Muhammad Umar Qayyum, Ahmed Ali Keerio, Ramsha Zaheer, Usman Mushtaq, Verda Baig, Raza Hussain, Muhammad Faisal","doi":"10.37029/jcas.v10i2.573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The oncological safety of a submental (SM) flap is thought to be controversial. The objective of our study was to validate our previous study regarding the oncological safety of SM flaps in oral cavity reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database was searched from 2015 to 2021 for all head-and-neck tumor patients, where reconstruction was performed using a SM flap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients, among whom 71 were males (81.8%), with a mean age of 55.3 years (range: 25-79 years), were retrieved from the database. The sites of involvement were 37 buccal mucosa, 27 lower alveolus, and 24 tongues. The mean follow-up was 33.5 months. The SM flap reconstruction was done for 88 patients; 3 had complete loss of flap, 17 had incomplete loss/partial necrosis, and 68 patients had uneventful recovery of the flap. We had 16 patients with local recurrence. Of these, 4 (4.5%) patients had clear margins and no lymphadenopathy at the level I at the final histopathology report.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides validation of the oncological safety of the SM flap and establishes that nodal positivity at level I alone does not contribute to recurrence at the primary site.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"10 2","pages":"573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Oncological Safety of Submental Flap Reconstruction in Head-and-Neck Cancers: An Extended Follow-up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Umar Qayyum, Ahmed Ali Keerio, Ramsha Zaheer, Usman Mushtaq, Verda Baig, Raza Hussain, Muhammad Faisal\",\"doi\":\"10.37029/jcas.v10i2.573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The oncological safety of a submental (SM) flap is thought to be controversial. The objective of our study was to validate our previous study regarding the oncological safety of SM flaps in oral cavity reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database was searched from 2015 to 2021 for all head-and-neck tumor patients, where reconstruction was performed using a SM flap.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients, among whom 71 were males (81.8%), with a mean age of 55.3 years (range: 25-79 years), were retrieved from the database. The sites of involvement were 37 buccal mucosa, 27 lower alveolus, and 24 tongues. The mean follow-up was 33.5 months. The SM flap reconstruction was done for 88 patients; 3 had complete loss of flap, 17 had incomplete loss/partial necrosis, and 68 patients had uneventful recovery of the flap. We had 16 patients with local recurrence. Of these, 4 (4.5%) patients had clear margins and no lymphadenopathy at the level I at the final histopathology report.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides validation of the oncological safety of the SM flap and establishes that nodal positivity at level I alone does not contribute to recurrence at the primary site.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer & allied specialties\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer & allied specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v10i2.573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v10i2.573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介人们认为下颌骨(SM)皮瓣的肿瘤安全性存在争议。我们的研究旨在验证我们之前关于SM皮瓣在口腔重建中的肿瘤安全性的研究:在电子数据库中搜索了2015年至2021年所有使用SM皮瓣进行重建的头颈部肿瘤患者:从数据库中检索到88例口腔鳞状细胞癌患者,其中71例为男性(81.8%),平均年龄为55.3岁(范围:25-79岁)。受累部位包括 37 个口腔黏膜、27 个下齿槽和 24 个舌头。平均随访时间为 33.5 个月。88例患者进行了SM皮瓣重建,其中3例皮瓣完全缺失,17例皮瓣不完全缺失/部分坏死,68例患者的皮瓣恢复顺利。有 16 名患者出现局部复发。其中,4 例(4.5%)患者的边缘清晰,最终组织病理学报告显示 I 级无淋巴结肿大:这项研究验证了 SM 皮瓣在肿瘤学上的安全性,并确定了 I 层结节阳性本身不会导致原发部位的复发。
The Oncological Safety of Submental Flap Reconstruction in Head-and-Neck Cancers: An Extended Follow-up Study.
Introduction: The oncological safety of a submental (SM) flap is thought to be controversial. The objective of our study was to validate our previous study regarding the oncological safety of SM flaps in oral cavity reconstruction.
Materials and methods: An electronic database was searched from 2015 to 2021 for all head-and-neck tumor patients, where reconstruction was performed using a SM flap.
Results: Eighty-eight oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients, among whom 71 were males (81.8%), with a mean age of 55.3 years (range: 25-79 years), were retrieved from the database. The sites of involvement were 37 buccal mucosa, 27 lower alveolus, and 24 tongues. The mean follow-up was 33.5 months. The SM flap reconstruction was done for 88 patients; 3 had complete loss of flap, 17 had incomplete loss/partial necrosis, and 68 patients had uneventful recovery of the flap. We had 16 patients with local recurrence. Of these, 4 (4.5%) patients had clear margins and no lymphadenopathy at the level I at the final histopathology report.
Conclusion: This study provides validation of the oncological safety of the SM flap and establishes that nodal positivity at level I alone does not contribute to recurrence at the primary site.