焦亚硫酸钠对盐碱地甜高粱青贮质量的影响:微生物多样性和元基因组分析

IF 2.3 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS agricultural science & technology Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0010410.1021/acsagscitech.4c00104
Li Wei*, Qian Lu, Hongshen Li, Dong Wei, Xinxin Zhang, Jia Ouyang, Chunying Li and Shizhong Li*, 
{"title":"焦亚硫酸钠对盐碱地甜高粱青贮质量的影响:微生物多样性和元基因组分析","authors":"Li Wei*,&nbsp;Qian Lu,&nbsp;Hongshen Li,&nbsp;Dong Wei,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang,&nbsp;Jia Ouyang,&nbsp;Chunying Li and Shizhong Li*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0010410.1021/acsagscitech.4c00104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study examined the impact of sodium pyrosulfite (Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) as a silage additive on the fermentation, quality, microbial diversity, and metabolic function of sweet sorghum silage in saline–alkali soil. Sweet sorghum grown in local saline–alkali soil was harvested, defoliated, and sprayed with a Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> solution (contained 400–2000 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>), vacuum-sealed, and fermented at 25 °C. Samples were stored for 0–64 days and analyzed for chemical composition and microbial diversity. After 8 days, the pH of all silages dropped below 3.8. The 16th day silage chemical analysis revealed Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> inhibiting ethanol and acetic acid production; S12 showed the best results: 5.497% total sugar, 2.357% lactic acid, 0.825% acetic acid, and 0.669% ethanol and achieved the highest silage quality scores (DB50/T 669-2016: 82, “Excellent”; DGL: 19, “Very Good”). Microbial analysis showed that Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> inhibited spoilage microbes, reduced sugar consumption by nonlactic acid bacteria (such as genus <i>Rehenlla1</i>), and promoted the fermentation of lactic acid bacteria, and the original pathogenic genus did not hinder lactic acid fermentation. Predominant genera like <i>Rehenlla1</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> contributed the most to the key metabolic pathways of silage in the best treatment period.</p>","PeriodicalId":93846,"journal":{"name":"ACS agricultural science & technology","volume":"4 8","pages":"791–805 791–805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Sodium Pyrosulfite on the Quality of Sweet Sorghum Silage in Saline–Alkali Soil: Microbial Diversity and Metagenomic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Li Wei*,&nbsp;Qian Lu,&nbsp;Hongshen Li,&nbsp;Dong Wei,&nbsp;Xinxin Zhang,&nbsp;Jia Ouyang,&nbsp;Chunying Li and Shizhong Li*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsagscitech.4c0010410.1021/acsagscitech.4c00104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study examined the impact of sodium pyrosulfite (Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) as a silage additive on the fermentation, quality, microbial diversity, and metabolic function of sweet sorghum silage in saline–alkali soil. Sweet sorghum grown in local saline–alkali soil was harvested, defoliated, and sprayed with a Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> solution (contained 400–2000 ppm SO<sub>2</sub>), vacuum-sealed, and fermented at 25 °C. Samples were stored for 0–64 days and analyzed for chemical composition and microbial diversity. After 8 days, the pH of all silages dropped below 3.8. The 16th day silage chemical analysis revealed Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> inhibiting ethanol and acetic acid production; S12 showed the best results: 5.497% total sugar, 2.357% lactic acid, 0.825% acetic acid, and 0.669% ethanol and achieved the highest silage quality scores (DB50/T 669-2016: 82, “Excellent”; DGL: 19, “Very Good”). Microbial analysis showed that Na<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> inhibited spoilage microbes, reduced sugar consumption by nonlactic acid bacteria (such as genus <i>Rehenlla1</i>), and promoted the fermentation of lactic acid bacteria, and the original pathogenic genus did not hinder lactic acid fermentation. Predominant genera like <i>Rehenlla1</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i> contributed the most to the key metabolic pathways of silage in the best treatment period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"volume\":\"4 8\",\"pages\":\"791–805 791–805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS agricultural science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS agricultural science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsagscitech.4c00104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了焦亚硫酸钠(Na2S2O5)作为青贮添加剂对盐碱土壤中甜高粱青贮发酵、质量、微生物多样性和代谢功能的影响。将生长在当地盐碱土壤中的甜高粱收割、落叶、喷洒 Na2S2O5 溶液(含 400-2000 ppm SO2)、真空密封并在 25 °C 下发酵。样品储存 0-64 天,分析其化学成分和微生物多样性。8 天后,所有青贮饲料的 pH 值均降至 3.8 以下。第 16 天的青贮化学分析显示,Na2S2O5 抑制了乙醇和乙酸的产生;S12 的结果最好:S12 的结果最好:总糖 5.497%、乳酸 2.357%、乙酸 0.825% 和乙醇 0.669%,青贮质量得分最高(DB50/T 669-2016:82,"优";DGL:19,"很好")。微生物分析表明,Na2S2O5 可抑制腐败微生物,减少非乳酸菌(如 Rehenlla1 属)的糖分消耗,促进乳酸菌的发酵,而原病原菌属并不妨碍乳酸发酵。在最佳处理期,Rehenlla1 和乳酸菌等主要菌属对青贮饲料的关键代谢途径贡献最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Sodium Pyrosulfite on the Quality of Sweet Sorghum Silage in Saline–Alkali Soil: Microbial Diversity and Metagenomic Analysis

This study examined the impact of sodium pyrosulfite (Na2S2O5) as a silage additive on the fermentation, quality, microbial diversity, and metabolic function of sweet sorghum silage in saline–alkali soil. Sweet sorghum grown in local saline–alkali soil was harvested, defoliated, and sprayed with a Na2S2O5 solution (contained 400–2000 ppm SO2), vacuum-sealed, and fermented at 25 °C. Samples were stored for 0–64 days and analyzed for chemical composition and microbial diversity. After 8 days, the pH of all silages dropped below 3.8. The 16th day silage chemical analysis revealed Na2S2O5 inhibiting ethanol and acetic acid production; S12 showed the best results: 5.497% total sugar, 2.357% lactic acid, 0.825% acetic acid, and 0.669% ethanol and achieved the highest silage quality scores (DB50/T 669-2016: 82, “Excellent”; DGL: 19, “Very Good”). Microbial analysis showed that Na2S2O5 inhibited spoilage microbes, reduced sugar consumption by nonlactic acid bacteria (such as genus Rehenlla1), and promoted the fermentation of lactic acid bacteria, and the original pathogenic genus did not hinder lactic acid fermentation. Predominant genera like Rehenlla1 and Lactobacillus contributed the most to the key metabolic pathways of silage in the best treatment period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Time-to-Failure Approach for Estimating the Shelf Life of Freeze-Dried Carotenoid-Enriched Apples: Forecasting the Deterioration of Quality Properties for Different Packaging Types and Storage Conditions Photo- and Thermo-Chemical Properties and Biological Activities of Saclipins, UV-Absorbing Compounds Derived from the Cyanobacterium Aphanothece sacrum Investigating the Effect of Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, and Ethylene Gases on Khasi Mandarin’ Orange Fruit during Storage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1