Xiaoqin Gan MD, Ziliang Ye MD, Yuanyuan Zhang MD, Panpan He MD, Mengyi Liu MD, Chun Zhou MD, Yanjun Zhang MD, Sisi Yang MD, Yu Huang MD, Hao Xiang MD, Xianhui Qin MD
{"title":"甜饮料与糖尿病前期或糖尿病患者的心房颤动。","authors":"Xiaoqin Gan MD, Ziliang Ye MD, Yuanyuan Zhang MD, Panpan He MD, Mengyi Liu MD, Chun Zhou MD, Yanjun Zhang MD, Sisi Yang MD, Yu Huang MD, Hao Xiang MD, Xianhui Qin MD","doi":"10.1111/dom.15859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"26 11","pages":"5147-5156"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sweetened beverages and atrial fibrillation in people with prediabetes or diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqin Gan MD, Ziliang Ye MD, Yuanyuan Zhang MD, Panpan He MD, Mengyi Liu MD, Chun Zhou MD, Yanjun Zhang MD, Sisi Yang MD, Yu Huang MD, Hao Xiang MD, Xianhui Qin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.15859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"26 11\",\"pages\":\"5147-5156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.15859\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.15859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sweetened beverages and atrial fibrillation in people with prediabetes or diabetes
Aim
To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.
Methods
A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.
Results
During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).
Conclusions
Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.