系统性红斑狼疮患者皮下注射贝利木单抗和一个周期利妥昔单抗序贯疗法的疗效和安全性:3 期随机安慰剂对照 BLISS-BELIEVE 研究。

IF 20.3 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1136/ard-2024-225686
Cynthia Aranow, Cornelia F Allaart, Zahir Amoura, Ian N Bruce, Patricia C Cagnoli, Walter W Chatham, Kenneth L Clark, Richard Furie, James Groark, Murray B Urowitz, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Mark Daniels, Norma Lynn Fox, Yun Irene Gregan, Robert B Henderson, André van Maurik, Josephine C Ocran-Appiah, Mary Oldham, David A Roth, Don Shanahan, Paul P Tak, Yk Onno Teng
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮患者皮下注射贝利木单抗和一个周期利妥昔单抗序贯疗法的疗效和安全性:3 期随机安慰剂对照 BLISS-BELIEVE 研究。","authors":"Cynthia Aranow, Cornelia F Allaart, Zahir Amoura, Ian N Bruce, Patricia C Cagnoli, Walter W Chatham, Kenneth L Clark, Richard Furie, James Groark, Murray B Urowitz, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Mark Daniels, Norma Lynn Fox, Yun Irene Gregan, Robert B Henderson, André van Maurik, Josephine C Ocran-Appiah, Mary Oldham, David A Roth, Don Shanahan, Paul P Tak, Yk Onno Teng","doi":"10.1136/ard-2024-225686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03312907.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1502-1512"},"PeriodicalIF":20.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study.\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Aranow, Cornelia F Allaart, Zahir Amoura, Ian N Bruce, Patricia C Cagnoli, Walter W Chatham, Kenneth L Clark, Richard Furie, James Groark, Murray B Urowitz, Ronald van Vollenhoven, Mark Daniels, Norma Lynn Fox, Yun Irene Gregan, Robert B Henderson, André van Maurik, Josephine C Ocran-Appiah, Mary Oldham, David A Roth, Don Shanahan, Paul P Tak, Yk Onno Teng\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ard-2024-225686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included.</p><p><strong>Primary endpoint: </strong>proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03312907.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1502-1512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503042/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-225686\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2024-225686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者停用皮质类固醇激素和免疫抑制剂后,疾病活动控制是治疗目标之一。我们评估了连续皮下注射贝利木单抗(BEL)和一个周期的利妥昔单抗(RTX)能否达到这一目标:在这项3期双盲BLISS-BELIEVE试验(葛兰素史克研究205646)中,活动性系统性红斑狼疮患者开始皮下注射贝利木单抗200毫克/周,疗程52周,在第4周和第6周随机接受静脉注射安慰剂(BEL/PBO)或静脉注射RTX 1000毫克(BEL/RTX),同时停止同时使用免疫抑制剂/皮质类固醇激素;标准治疗104周(BEL/ST;参照组)也包括在内。主要终点:第52周时,BEL/RTX与BEL/PBO相比,达到疾病控制(系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数-2000(SLEDAI-2K)≤2;无免疫抑制剂;泼尼松当量≤5毫克/天)的患者比例。主要(α对照)次要终点:临床缓解患者比例(第64周;临床SLEDAI-2K=0,无免疫抑制剂/皮质类固醇);疾病控制患者比例(第104周)。其他评估:疾病控制持续时间、抗dsDNA抗体、C3/C4和B细胞/B细胞亚群:修改后的意向治疗人群包括 263 名患者。总体而言,在第52周时,16.7%的BEL/PBO患者(12/72)和19.4%的BEL/RTX患者(28/144)达到了疾病控制(OR(95% CI)为1.27(0.60至2.71);P=0.5342)。在主要次要终点方面,BEL/RTX 和 BEL/PBO 之间的差异无统计学意义。BEL/RTX与BEL/PBO相比,抗dsDNA抗体和大多数评估的B细胞/B细胞亚群较低。BEL/RTX与BEL/PBO相比,52周的平均疾病控制时间明显更长:结论:就大多数终点分析而言,BEL/RTX并不比BEL/PBO更有优势;但与BEL/PBO相比,BEL/RTX能明显改善疾病活动性指标。有必要对联合治疗进行进一步研究:NCT03312907。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of sequential therapy with subcutaneous belimumab and one cycle of rituximab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled BLISS-BELIEVE study.

Objectives: Disease activity control in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with corticosteroid and immunosuppressant withdrawal is a treatment goal. We evaluated whether this could be attained with sequential subcutaneous belimumab (BEL) and one cycle of rituximab (RTX).

Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind BLISS-BELIEVE trial (GSK Study 205646), patients with active SLE initiating subcutaneous BEL 200 mg/week for 52 weeks were randomised to intravenous placebo (BEL/PBO) or intravenous RTX 1000 mg (BEL/RTX) at weeks 4 and 6 while stopping concomitant immunosuppressants/tapering corticosteroids; standard therapy for 104 weeks (BEL/ST; reference arm) was included.

Primary endpoint: proportion of patients achieving disease control (SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≤2; without immunosuppressants; prednisone equivalent ≤5 mg/day) at week 52 with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Major (alpha-controlled) secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with clinical remission (week 64; clinical SLEDAI-2K=0, without immunosuppressants/corticosteroids); proportion of patients with disease control (week 104). Other assessments: disease control duration, anti-dsDNA antibody, C3/C4 and B cells/B-cell subsets.

Results: The modified intention-to-treat population included 263 patients. Overall, 16.7% (12/72) of BEL/PBO and 19.4% (28/144) of BEL/RTX patients achieved disease control (OR (95% CI) 1.27 (0.60 to 2.71); p=0.5342) at week 52. For major secondary endpoints, differences between BEL/RTX and BEL/PBO were not statistically significant. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and most assessed B cells/B-cell subsets were lower with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO. Mean disease control duration through 52 weeks was significantly greater with BEL/RTX versus BEL/PBO.

Conclusions: BEL/RTX showed no superiority over BEL/PBO for most endpoints analysed; however, it led to significant improvements in disease activity markers compared with BEL/PBO. Further investigation of combination treatment is warranted.

Trial registration number: NCT03312907.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
期刊最新文献
Real-life use of the PEXIVAS reduced-dose glucocorticoid regimen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis. Psoriatic arthritis phenotype clusters and their association with treatment response: a real-world longitudinal cohort study from the psoriatic arthritis research consortium. Acod1-mediated inhibition of aerobic glycolysis suppresses osteoclast differentiation and attenuates bone erosion in arthritis. Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials. Early identification of rheumatoid arthritis: does it induce treatment-related cost savings?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1