利用肺部超声波预测早产儿拔管失败:诊断准确性研究。

Arun Sett, Gillian Foo, Alvin Ngeow, Niranjan Thomas, Penny P L Kee, Amir Zayegh, Kate A Hodgson, Susan M Donath, David G Tingay, Peter G Davis, Brett J Manley, Sheryle R Rogerson
{"title":"利用肺部超声波预测早产儿拔管失败:诊断准确性研究。","authors":"Arun Sett, Gillian Foo, Alvin Ngeow, Niranjan Thomas, Penny P L Kee, Amir Zayegh, Kate A Hodgson, Susan M Donath, David G Tingay, Peter G Davis, Brett J Manley, Sheryle R Rogerson","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting extubation failure in preterm infants using lung ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.\",\"authors\":\"Arun Sett, Gillian Foo, Alvin Ngeow, Niranjan Thomas, Penny P L Kee, Amir Zayegh, Kate A Hodgson, Susan M Donath, David G Tingay, Peter G Davis, Brett J Manley, Sheryle R Rogerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two neonatal intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327172\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327172","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定拔管前肺部超声(LUS)预测早产儿再次插管的准确性 设计:前瞻性诊断准确性研究:前瞻性诊断准确性研究:两个新生儿重症监护室:方法:在拔管前进行前方和侧方 LUS。主要结果是 LUS 评分(范围 0-24)预测 72 小时内再次插管的准确性。次要结果是预测以下情况的准确性:(1) 7 天内再次插管;(2) 按产后年龄分层的再次插管;(3) 仅侧方成像的准确性(范围 0-12)。对极早产儿进行了预先指定的亚组分析 结果:研究对象为 100 名早产儿,平均(标清)胎龄为 27.4(2.2)周,出生体重为 1059(354)克。其中 13 名婴儿随后再次插管。拔管前 LUS 评分预测再插管的 AUC(95% CI)为 0.63(0.45-0.80)。极早产儿的准确性更高:AUC为0.70 (0.52-0.87),7天大婴儿的准确性更高。单独的侧面成像与扫描前部和侧面区域的准确性相似:与之前的研究不同,LUS 并不是早产儿再次插管的有力预测指标。极早产儿的准确性更高。未来的研究应重点关注拔管失败风险最高的婴儿,并考虑采用更简单的成像方案:试验注册号:澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12621001356853。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting extubation failure in preterm infants using lung ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Objective: To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation.

Design: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Setting: Two neonatal intensive care units.

Methods: Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs).

Results: One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions.

Conclusions: In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols.

Trial registration number: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
Response to: 'Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants' by Sharma et al. Clinical and neuroimaging patterns of perinatal intracranial haemorrhage in fetuses and term-born neonates: a prospective observational cohort study. Influence of clinical experience on newborn manikin mask ventilation performance using a respiratory function monitor. State of skin antiseptic choices in UK neonatal intensive care units in 2023. Associations between physical activity and development in preschool-aged children born <30 weeks' gestation: a cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1