跟腱和髌腱僵硬度评估中腱力测定法的实证应用:系统回顾。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1097/JSM.0000000000001267
Lotte van Dam, Rosanne Fischer, Mireille Baart, Johannes Zwerver
{"title":"跟腱和髌腱僵硬度评估中腱力测定法的实证应用:系统回顾。","authors":"Lotte van Dam, Rosanne Fischer, Mireille Baart, Johannes Zwerver","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically describe the next relevant aspects of tendotonometry in (1) its validity and reliability, (2) differences between populations, (3) the effect of interventions, and (4) differences between healthy and symptomatic Achilles tendon (AT) and patellar tendon (PT).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Three online databases (PubMed, Embase, and EBSCOhost) were systematically searched on the 10th of October 2023. All scientific literature concerning the use of tendotonometry in assessing tendon stiffness was collected. Articles were eligible if tendotonometry with a myotonometer digital palpation device was used to assess PT or AT stiffness in adults.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were included, which were categorized into studies regarding the (1a) reliability and (1b) validity of tendotonometry, (2) differences in stiffness between populations, (3) changes in stiffness due to interventions, (4) stiffness of healthy compared with injured tendons, and (5) other observational studies. The inter-rater and intrarater reliability of tendotonometry appeared to be good in assessing AT and PT stiffness, with only moderate evidence for the AT and inconclusive evidence for the PT. There is high certainty evidence that tendotonometry can detect differences in AT and PT stiffness after training interventions. Inconsistent results were found for the adequacy of tendotonometry to detect differences in AT and PT stiffness between populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review shows a potential role for tendotonometry in measuring tendon stiffness. However, more research is needed for validating the use of tendotonometry in AT and PT and its exact clinical interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substantiating the Use of Tendotonometry for the Assessment of Achilles and Patellar Tendon Stiffness: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Lotte van Dam, Rosanne Fischer, Mireille Baart, Johannes Zwerver\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically describe the next relevant aspects of tendotonometry in (1) its validity and reliability, (2) differences between populations, (3) the effect of interventions, and (4) differences between healthy and symptomatic Achilles tendon (AT) and patellar tendon (PT).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Three online databases (PubMed, Embase, and EBSCOhost) were systematically searched on the 10th of October 2023. All scientific literature concerning the use of tendotonometry in assessing tendon stiffness was collected. Articles were eligible if tendotonometry with a myotonometer digital palpation device was used to assess PT or AT stiffness in adults.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Thirty-four studies were included, which were categorized into studies regarding the (1a) reliability and (1b) validity of tendotonometry, (2) differences in stiffness between populations, (3) changes in stiffness due to interventions, (4) stiffness of healthy compared with injured tendons, and (5) other observational studies. The inter-rater and intrarater reliability of tendotonometry appeared to be good in assessing AT and PT stiffness, with only moderate evidence for the AT and inconclusive evidence for the PT. There is high certainty evidence that tendotonometry can detect differences in AT and PT stiffness after training interventions. Inconsistent results were found for the adequacy of tendotonometry to detect differences in AT and PT stiffness between populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review shows a potential role for tendotonometry in measuring tendon stiffness. However, more research is needed for validating the use of tendotonometry in AT and PT and its exact clinical interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001267\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001267","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统描述腱测量法在以下方面的相关内容:(1) 有效性和可靠性;(2) 不同人群之间的差异;(3) 干预措施的效果;(4) 健康与有症状的跟腱(AT)和髌腱(PT)之间的差异:2023 年 10 月 10 日,对三个在线数据库(PubMed、Embase 和 EBSCOhost)进行了系统检索。收集了所有关于使用腱测量法评估肌腱硬度的科学文献。如果使用肌腱测量仪数字触诊装置来评估成人肌腱的僵硬度,则文章符合条件:主要结果:共纳入 34 项研究,这些研究分为:(1a) 肌腱硬度测量法的可靠性和 (1b) 有效性;(2) 不同人群之间肌腱硬度的差异;(3) 干预措施导致的肌腱硬度变化;(4) 健康肌腱与受伤肌腱的硬度比较;(5) 其他观察性研究。在评估AT和PT僵硬度时,腱测量法的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性似乎都不错,但对AT只有中等程度的证据,对PT则没有确定的证据。有高度确定性的证据表明,腱线测量法可以检测出训练干预后肌张力和肌张力僵硬度的差异。关于腱线测量法是否足以检测出不同人群间肌张力和肌张力僵硬度的差异,结果并不一致:本综述显示了腱测量法在测量肌腱僵硬度方面的潜在作用。然而,还需要更多的研究来验证肌腱测量法在肌腱活动度和肌腱活动度中的应用及其准确的临床解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Substantiating the Use of Tendotonometry for the Assessment of Achilles and Patellar Tendon Stiffness: A Systematic Review.

Objective: To systematically describe the next relevant aspects of tendotonometry in (1) its validity and reliability, (2) differences between populations, (3) the effect of interventions, and (4) differences between healthy and symptomatic Achilles tendon (AT) and patellar tendon (PT).

Data sources: Three online databases (PubMed, Embase, and EBSCOhost) were systematically searched on the 10th of October 2023. All scientific literature concerning the use of tendotonometry in assessing tendon stiffness was collected. Articles were eligible if tendotonometry with a myotonometer digital palpation device was used to assess PT or AT stiffness in adults.

Main results: Thirty-four studies were included, which were categorized into studies regarding the (1a) reliability and (1b) validity of tendotonometry, (2) differences in stiffness between populations, (3) changes in stiffness due to interventions, (4) stiffness of healthy compared with injured tendons, and (5) other observational studies. The inter-rater and intrarater reliability of tendotonometry appeared to be good in assessing AT and PT stiffness, with only moderate evidence for the AT and inconclusive evidence for the PT. There is high certainty evidence that tendotonometry can detect differences in AT and PT stiffness after training interventions. Inconsistent results were found for the adequacy of tendotonometry to detect differences in AT and PT stiffness between populations.

Conclusions: This review shows a potential role for tendotonometry in measuring tendon stiffness. However, more research is needed for validating the use of tendotonometry in AT and PT and its exact clinical interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
185
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.
期刊最新文献
Give It a Rest: The Impact of Rest Days on Musculoskeletal Injuries Among Starting Pitchers in Major League Baseball. The Effect of Bye Weeks on Injury Event Rates in the Canadian Football League. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ultrasonic Tenotomy for Refractory Patellar Tendinopathy in High-Level Athletes: A Case Series. Concussion Incidence, Mechanism, and Perspectives Among Australian Elite Surfers: Implications for Medical Support and Safety Protocols. Kiteboarding Injuries: Epidemiology, Common Treatment Strategies, and Time to Return to Kiteboarding Following Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1