旋转血栓弹性测量法能否快速确定孤立性脑外伤的治疗目标?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14480
Abhiram D Hiwase, Christopher D Ovenden, Lola M Kaukas, Mark Finnis, Zeyu Zhang, Stephanie O'Connor, Ngee Foo, Benjamin Reddi, Adam J Wells, Daniel Y Ellis
{"title":"旋转血栓弹性测量法能否快速确定孤立性脑外伤的治疗目标?","authors":"Abhiram D Hiwase, Christopher D Ovenden, Lola M Kaukas, Mark Finnis, Zeyu Zhang, Stephanie O'Connor, Ngee Foo, Benjamin Reddi, Adam J Wells, Daniel Y Ellis","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Coagulation assessment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) typically relies upon laboratory-based standard coagulation tests (SCTs), including the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), INR and platelet count. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) sigma is an alternative point-of-care assay; however, its role in isolated TBI is under-evaluated. The present study aims to assess the prognostic utility of ROTEM sigma in isolated TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ROTEM sigma analysis was performed during the initial evaluation of patients presenting to the Royal Adelaide Hospital between February 2022 and 2023 with radiographically demonstrated traumatic intracranial haemorrhage and GCS ≤14. Patients with concomitant severe extracranial injury, or who received blood products or antifibrinolytic therapy prior to sample collection were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients had blood samples analysed with ROTEM, 25 of these patients were also evaluated with paired SCTs. Twenty-two per cent (8/36) of patients with isolated TBI had a hypocoaguable ROTEM profile, and this was associated with an increased incidence of head injury-related death (50% [4/8] vs 11% [3/28], P = 0.03). Median diagnostic turn-around-times were shorter for ROTEM parameters compared to SCT counterparts: EXTEM clotting time (CT) versus INR (20 vs 63 min, P < 0.01), and INTEM CT versus aPTT (21 vs 63 min, P < 0.01). EXTEM CT, FIBTEM CT and INR values had similar performance in predicting head injury-related death, area under the receiver operator curves were 0.8, 0.8 and 0.7, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ROTEM sigma expedites the detection of clinically significant coagulopathy in isolated TBI. EXTEM and FIBTEM CT values are more rapidly attainable than INR and comparable in predicting head injury-related death.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can rotational thromboelastometry rapidly identify theragnostic targets in isolated traumatic brain injury?\",\"authors\":\"Abhiram D Hiwase, Christopher D Ovenden, Lola M Kaukas, Mark Finnis, Zeyu Zhang, Stephanie O'Connor, Ngee Foo, Benjamin Reddi, Adam J Wells, Daniel Y Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.14480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Coagulation assessment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) typically relies upon laboratory-based standard coagulation tests (SCTs), including the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), INR and platelet count. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) sigma is an alternative point-of-care assay; however, its role in isolated TBI is under-evaluated. The present study aims to assess the prognostic utility of ROTEM sigma in isolated TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ROTEM sigma analysis was performed during the initial evaluation of patients presenting to the Royal Adelaide Hospital between February 2022 and 2023 with radiographically demonstrated traumatic intracranial haemorrhage and GCS ≤14. Patients with concomitant severe extracranial injury, or who received blood products or antifibrinolytic therapy prior to sample collection were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six patients had blood samples analysed with ROTEM, 25 of these patients were also evaluated with paired SCTs. Twenty-two per cent (8/36) of patients with isolated TBI had a hypocoaguable ROTEM profile, and this was associated with an increased incidence of head injury-related death (50% [4/8] vs 11% [3/28], P = 0.03). Median diagnostic turn-around-times were shorter for ROTEM parameters compared to SCT counterparts: EXTEM clotting time (CT) versus INR (20 vs 63 min, P < 0.01), and INTEM CT versus aPTT (21 vs 63 min, P < 0.01). EXTEM CT, FIBTEM CT and INR values had similar performance in predicting head injury-related death, area under the receiver operator curves were 0.8, 0.8 and 0.7, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ROTEM sigma expedites the detection of clinically significant coagulopathy in isolated TBI. EXTEM and FIBTEM CT values are more rapidly attainable than INR and comparable in predicting head injury-related death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.14480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的凝血评估通常依赖于实验室标准凝血检测(SCT),包括活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、INR 和血小板计数。旋转血栓弹性测定法(ROTEM)sigma 是一种替代性的床旁检测方法,但其在孤立性创伤性脑损伤中的作用尚未得到充分评估。本研究旨在评估 ROTEM sigma 在孤立性创伤性脑损伤中的预后作用:方法:在对 2022 年 2 月至 2023 年 2 月期间到皇家阿德莱德医院就诊的患者进行初步评估时,对影像学显示为创伤性颅内出血且 GCS ≤14 的患者进行 ROTEM sigma 分析。排除了同时伴有严重颅外损伤或在样本采集前接受过血液制品或抗纤维蛋白溶解治疗的患者:结果:36 名患者的血液样本接受了 ROTEM 分析,其中 25 名患者还接受了配对 SCT 评估。在孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者中,22%(8/36)的 ROTEM 分析结果呈低凝血状态,这与头部损伤相关死亡的发生率增加有关(50% [4/8] vs 11% [3/28],P = 0.03)。与 SCT 相比,ROTEM 参数的中位诊断周转时间更短:EXTEM凝血时间(CT)与 INR(20 分钟与 63 分钟,P 结论:ROTEM sigma 可加快诊断速度:ROTEM sigma 加快了对孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者临床重大凝血病的检测。与 INR 相比,EXTEM 和 FIBTEM CT 值更容易获得,在预测与头部损伤相关的死亡方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can rotational thromboelastometry rapidly identify theragnostic targets in isolated traumatic brain injury?

Objective: Coagulation assessment in traumatic brain injury (TBI) typically relies upon laboratory-based standard coagulation tests (SCTs), including the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), INR and platelet count. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) sigma is an alternative point-of-care assay; however, its role in isolated TBI is under-evaluated. The present study aims to assess the prognostic utility of ROTEM sigma in isolated TBI.

Methods: ROTEM sigma analysis was performed during the initial evaluation of patients presenting to the Royal Adelaide Hospital between February 2022 and 2023 with radiographically demonstrated traumatic intracranial haemorrhage and GCS ≤14. Patients with concomitant severe extracranial injury, or who received blood products or antifibrinolytic therapy prior to sample collection were excluded.

Results: Thirty-six patients had blood samples analysed with ROTEM, 25 of these patients were also evaluated with paired SCTs. Twenty-two per cent (8/36) of patients with isolated TBI had a hypocoaguable ROTEM profile, and this was associated with an increased incidence of head injury-related death (50% [4/8] vs 11% [3/28], P = 0.03). Median diagnostic turn-around-times were shorter for ROTEM parameters compared to SCT counterparts: EXTEM clotting time (CT) versus INR (20 vs 63 min, P < 0.01), and INTEM CT versus aPTT (21 vs 63 min, P < 0.01). EXTEM CT, FIBTEM CT and INR values had similar performance in predicting head injury-related death, area under the receiver operator curves were 0.8, 0.8 and 0.7, respectively.

Conclusions: ROTEM sigma expedites the detection of clinically significant coagulopathy in isolated TBI. EXTEM and FIBTEM CT values are more rapidly attainable than INR and comparable in predicting head injury-related death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Impact of the XVII Pacific Games on the National Referral Hospital Emergency Department, Solomon Islands. Rethinking the pan scan in stable trauma: A comparison of whole-body computed tomography and selective imaging in clinically stable blunt force trauma. Somatic symptom and related disorders in a tertiary paediatric hospital: Characteristics of ED use prior to admission. Rate and yield of imaging for acute pyelonephritis in the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study. Research outputs after the Coursework Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1