Visitect 高级疾病护理点 CD4 平台的诊断性能:多站点验证、成本核算和定性分析的务实混合方法。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1097/QAI.0000000000003505
Elizabeth Nalintya, Preethiya Sekar, Olive L Namakula, Kiiza Kandole Tadeo, Richard Kwizera, Lucy Apeduno, Diana Rose Naluyima, Rachel Nanano, Lilian Mujungu, Alice Lehman, Tessa Adzemovic, Mathius Amperiize, Paul Kavuma, Viola Kasone, Ann Fieberg, Patricia Nerima, Biyue Dai, David B Meya, David R Boulware, Radha Rajasingham
{"title":"Visitect 高级疾病护理点 CD4 平台的诊断性能:多站点验证、成本核算和定性分析的务实混合方法。","authors":"Elizabeth Nalintya, Preethiya Sekar, Olive L Namakula, Kiiza Kandole Tadeo, Richard Kwizera, Lucy Apeduno, Diana Rose Naluyima, Rachel Nanano, Lilian Mujungu, Alice Lehman, Tessa Adzemovic, Mathius Amperiize, Paul Kavuma, Viola Kasone, Ann Fieberg, Patricia Nerima, Biyue Dai, David B Meya, David R Boulware, Radha Rajasingham","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease test (AccuBio, Alva, United Kingdom) is a rapid, semi-quantitative assay that estimates CD4 results above or below 200 cells/μL. We evaluated the performance of the Visitect CD4 assay in semi-urban laboratories in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pragmatic laboratory validation of the Visitect CD4 platform in four routine HIV clinics in Uganda, nested within a cluster randomized trial evaluating an enhanced package of screening and treatment for persons with advanced HIV disease (NCT05085171). As part of the clinical trial, samples processed on the Visitect CD4 platform were confirmed using another CD4 testing method. We compared the diagnostic performance of the Visitect CD4 platform against the confirmatory method by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1495 venous blood samples that were processed both by the Visitect CD4 test and another confirmatory CD4 platform at clinics in Kampala, Uganda, specificity was 81% (95% CI, 79%-84%) and the positive predictive value was 69% (95% CI, 66%-73%). There were no samples for which the Visitect test was >200 cells/μL and the confirmatory test was ≤200 cells/μL, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%. Among Visitect CD4 tests that were read as <200 cells/μL with confirmatory results >200 cells/μL, the median confirmatory CD4 result was 397 (IQR, 281-590) cells/μL. Specificity varied by clinic ranging from 63% to 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given variable specificity of the Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform, successful implementation will require consideration of clinic context and laboratory staffing.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic performance of the Visitect Advanced Disease point-of-care CD4 platform: a pragmatic mixed-methods multisite validation, costing, and qualitative analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Nalintya, Preethiya Sekar, Olive L Namakula, Kiiza Kandole Tadeo, Richard Kwizera, Lucy Apeduno, Diana Rose Naluyima, Rachel Nanano, Lilian Mujungu, Alice Lehman, Tessa Adzemovic, Mathius Amperiize, Paul Kavuma, Viola Kasone, Ann Fieberg, Patricia Nerima, Biyue Dai, David B Meya, David R Boulware, Radha Rajasingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease test (AccuBio, Alva, United Kingdom) is a rapid, semi-quantitative assay that estimates CD4 results above or below 200 cells/μL. We evaluated the performance of the Visitect CD4 assay in semi-urban laboratories in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a pragmatic laboratory validation of the Visitect CD4 platform in four routine HIV clinics in Uganda, nested within a cluster randomized trial evaluating an enhanced package of screening and treatment for persons with advanced HIV disease (NCT05085171). As part of the clinical trial, samples processed on the Visitect CD4 platform were confirmed using another CD4 testing method. We compared the diagnostic performance of the Visitect CD4 platform against the confirmatory method by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1495 venous blood samples that were processed both by the Visitect CD4 test and another confirmatory CD4 platform at clinics in Kampala, Uganda, specificity was 81% (95% CI, 79%-84%) and the positive predictive value was 69% (95% CI, 66%-73%). There were no samples for which the Visitect test was >200 cells/μL and the confirmatory test was ≤200 cells/μL, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%. Among Visitect CD4 tests that were read as <200 cells/μL with confirmatory results >200 cells/μL, the median confirmatory CD4 result was 397 (IQR, 281-590) cells/μL. Specificity varied by clinic ranging from 63% to 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given variable specificity of the Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform, successful implementation will require consideration of clinic context and laboratory staffing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003505\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Visitect CD4晚期疾病检测试剂盒(AccuBio,英国阿尔瓦)是一种快速、半定量检测试剂盒,可估算出高于或低于 200 cells/μL 的 CD4 检测结果。我们评估了 Visitect CD4 检测法在乌干达半城市实验室的性能:我们在乌干达的四个常规 HIV 诊所对 Visitect CD4 平台进行了务实的实验室验证,该验证嵌套在一项群集随机试验中,该试验评估了针对晚期 HIV 患者的增强型一揽子筛查和治疗方案(NCT05085171)。作为临床试验的一部分,在 Visitect CD4 平台上处理的样本使用另一种 CD4 检测方法进行确认。我们通过评估灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,比较了 Visitect CD4 平台与确证方法的诊断性能:在乌干达坎帕拉的诊所中,同时使用 Visitect CD4 检测仪和另一种 CD4 确证平台处理了 1495 份静脉血样本,其中特异性为 81%(95% CI,79%-84%),阳性预测值为 69%(95% CI,66%-73%)。没有样本的 Visitect 检测结果大于 200 cells/μL,而确证检测结果≤200 cells/μL,因此灵敏度为 100%。在读数为 200 个细胞/μL 的 Visitect CD4 检测中,CD4 确诊结果的中位数为 397(IQR,281-590)个细胞/μL。特异性因诊所而异,从 63% 到 99% 不等:鉴于 Visitect CD4 高级疾病平台的特异性不一,成功实施该平台需要考虑诊所的具体情况和实验室的人员配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnostic performance of the Visitect Advanced Disease point-of-care CD4 platform: a pragmatic mixed-methods multisite validation, costing, and qualitative analysis.

Background: The Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease test (AccuBio, Alva, United Kingdom) is a rapid, semi-quantitative assay that estimates CD4 results above or below 200 cells/μL. We evaluated the performance of the Visitect CD4 assay in semi-urban laboratories in Uganda.

Methods: We performed a pragmatic laboratory validation of the Visitect CD4 platform in four routine HIV clinics in Uganda, nested within a cluster randomized trial evaluating an enhanced package of screening and treatment for persons with advanced HIV disease (NCT05085171). As part of the clinical trial, samples processed on the Visitect CD4 platform were confirmed using another CD4 testing method. We compared the diagnostic performance of the Visitect CD4 platform against the confirmatory method by evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

Results: Of 1495 venous blood samples that were processed both by the Visitect CD4 test and another confirmatory CD4 platform at clinics in Kampala, Uganda, specificity was 81% (95% CI, 79%-84%) and the positive predictive value was 69% (95% CI, 66%-73%). There were no samples for which the Visitect test was >200 cells/μL and the confirmatory test was ≤200 cells/μL, resulting in a sensitivity of 100%. Among Visitect CD4 tests that were read as <200 cells/μL with confirmatory results >200 cells/μL, the median confirmatory CD4 result was 397 (IQR, 281-590) cells/μL. Specificity varied by clinic ranging from 63% to 99%.

Conclusions: Given variable specificity of the Visitect CD4 Advanced Disease platform, successful implementation will require consideration of clinic context and laboratory staffing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
490
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes​ seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine Prophylaxis Has No Effect on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Mineral Content in African Breastfeeding Women Receiving Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV. Using machine learning techniques to predict viral suppression among people with HIV. Non-liver malignancies as main cause of mortality after HCV eradication among people living with HIV. Predictors of Injection Visit Adherence in Those Receiving Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine. Real-world comparative Analysis of Liposomal Doxorubicin versus Paclitaxel as First-Line Therapy for Kaposi Sarcoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1