Robby Markwart, Lena-Sophie Lehmann, Markus Krause, Paul Jung, Liliana Rost, Susanne Doepfmer, Lisa Kuempel, Doreen Kuschick, Kahina J Toutaoui, Christoph Heintze, Jutta Bleidorn, Florian Wolf
{"title":"初级保健实践中 CRP 护理点检测的使用情况和后果:一项针对德国 1,740 例患者的真实世界多中心观察研究。","authors":"Robby Markwart, Lena-Sophie Lehmann, Markus Krause, Paul Jung, Liliana Rost, Susanne Doepfmer, Lisa Kuempel, Doreen Kuschick, Kahina J Toutaoui, Christoph Heintze, Jutta Bleidorn, Florian Wolf","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C-reactive protein point-of-care tests (CRP-POCTs) can support GPs' clinical decision making but they are not widely used in German general practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the utilisation of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (from November 2022-April 2023).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use, with standardised data-collection sheets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs; 71.2% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs; 10.4%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5% of the cases (32.3% in favour versus 45.2% waiver). In GIs, CRP levels mainly affected decisions on further diagnostic procedures. GPs reported that CRP-POCTs were helpful in 88.6% of all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTIs. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision making and increases the GP's clinical confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilisation and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1740 patient cases in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Robby Markwart, Lena-Sophie Lehmann, Markus Krause, Paul Jung, Liliana Rost, Susanne Doepfmer, Lisa Kuempel, Doreen Kuschick, Kahina J Toutaoui, Christoph Heintze, Jutta Bleidorn, Florian Wolf\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>C-reactive protein point-of-care tests (CRP-POCTs) can support GPs' clinical decision making but they are not widely used in German general practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the utilisation of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (from November 2022-April 2023).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use, with standardised data-collection sheets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 1740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs; 71.2% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs; 10.4%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5% of the cases (32.3% in favour versus 45.2% waiver). In GIs, CRP levels mainly affected decisions on further diagnostic procedures. GPs reported that CRP-POCTs were helpful in 88.6% of all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTIs. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision making and increases the GP's clinical confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilisation and consequences of CRP point-of-care-testing in primary care practices: a real-world multicentre observational study with 1740 patient cases in Germany.
Background: C-reactive protein point-of-care tests (CRP-POCTs) can support GPs' clinical decision making but they are not widely used in German general practices.
Aim: To investigate the utilisation of semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs in routine primary care.
Design & setting: Prospective observational study in 49 general practices in Germany (from November 2022-April 2023).
Method: GPs were provided with CRP-POCTs and collected data for each CRP-POCT use, with standardised data-collection sheets.
Results: Data from 1740 CRP-POCT uses were recorded. GPs employed CRP-POCTs mainly for patients with respiratory tract infections (RTIs; 71.2% of all cases) and to a lesser extent for gastrointestinal infections (GIs; 10.4%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs were frequently used to distinguish between bacterial and viral aetiology (60.8%) and to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing (62.8%). In GIs, CRP-POCTs were mainly used to rule out severe disease progressions (53.2%) and for decisions on further diagnostic procedures (45.6%). In RTIs, CRP-POCTs influenced antibiotic prescribing in 77.5% of the cases (32.3% in favour versus 45.2% waiver). In GIs, CRP levels mainly affected decisions on further diagnostic procedures. GPs reported that CRP-POCTs were helpful in 88.6% of all cases.
Conclusion: When available, German GPs predominantly use semi-quantitative CRP-POCTs to guide decisions on antibiotic prescribing in patients with RTIs. CRP-POCT use improves clinical decision making and increases the GP's clinical confidence.