慢性腰背痛疾病的运动剂量(DOSE):剂量反应网络荟萃分析系统综述方案。

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108
Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy
{"title":"慢性腰背痛疾病的运动剂量(DOSE):剂量反应网络荟萃分析系统综述方案。","authors":"Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOSage of Exercise for chronic low back pain disorders (DOSE): protocol for a systematic review with dose-response network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331831/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性腰背疾病是造成全球直接和间接医疗负担的主要原因。运动训练可改善疼痛强度、心理健康和身体功能。然而,最佳处方变量尚不清楚。我们旨在比较各种运动剂量对慢性腰背疾病的疗效,以确定最佳处方变量。我们将检索六个数据库(Medline、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL)、试验登记处(ClinicalTrials.gov 和 WHO 国际临床试验登记平台)以及之前系统性综述的参考文献列表,并进行正向和反向引文追踪。我们将纳入以英语或德语发表的、经同行评审的随机对照试验(单项、分组或交叉试验),这些试验比较了运动训练与其他运动训练或非运动训练干预措施(保守、非手术、非药物、非侵入性治疗、安慰剂、假药、常规/标准护理、无治疗对照、候选对照)对慢性腰背痛成人患者的治疗效果。研究结果将包括疼痛强度、残疾程度、心理健康、不良事件、坚持率、辍学率和工作能力。将采用第二版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具。剂量将分为累积剂量(运动训练的总分钟数和每周分钟数)和个体剂量处方变量(干预持续时间、疗程持续时间、频率和强度)。将采用基于剂量-反应模型的网络荟萃分析来评估不同运动剂量的疗效比较,以确定剂量-反应关系。证据的确定性将采用 "建议评估、制定和评价分级法 "进行评估。有关最佳运动训练剂量的信息将有助于提高治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DOSage of Exercise for chronic low back pain disorders (DOSE): protocol for a systematic review with dose-response network meta-analysis.

Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiac health in breast cancer (CHiB): protocol for a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. It's about timing: how density can benefit future research on the optimal dosage of acute physical exercise breaks in esports. 24-hour Movement Behaviour study-Lithuanian protocol: a comprehensive overview of behaviours and health outcomes in adolescents. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of therapeutic exercise versus myofascial trigger point therapy in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathies: a randomised controlled trial. Correction: Differences in the technical performance of heading between men and women football players during FIFA World Cup 2022 and FIFA Women's World Cup 2023 matches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1