Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy
{"title":"慢性腰背痛疾病的运动剂量(DOSE):剂量反应网络荟萃分析系统综述方案。","authors":"Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e002108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DOSage of Exercise for chronic low back pain disorders (DOSE): protocol for a systematic review with dose-response network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Kumar Arora, Lars Donath, Patrick J Owen, Clint T Miller, Svenja Kaczorowski, Tobias Saueressig, Hugo Pedder, Niamh L Mundell, Scott D Tagliaferri, Ashish Diwan, Xiaolong Chen, Xiaohui Zhao, Eva-Maria Huessler, Katja Ehrenbrusthoff, Jon J Ford, Andrew J Hahne, Ludwig Hammel, Heike Norda, Daniel L Belavy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"e002108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331831/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
慢性腰背疾病是造成全球直接和间接医疗负担的主要原因。运动训练可改善疼痛强度、心理健康和身体功能。然而,最佳处方变量尚不清楚。我们旨在比较各种运动剂量对慢性腰背疾病的疗效,以确定最佳处方变量。我们将检索六个数据库(Medline、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL)、试验登记处(ClinicalTrials.gov 和 WHO 国际临床试验登记平台)以及之前系统性综述的参考文献列表,并进行正向和反向引文追踪。我们将纳入以英语或德语发表的、经同行评审的随机对照试验(单项、分组或交叉试验),这些试验比较了运动训练与其他运动训练或非运动训练干预措施(保守、非手术、非药物、非侵入性治疗、安慰剂、假药、常规/标准护理、无治疗对照、候选对照)对慢性腰背痛成人患者的治疗效果。研究结果将包括疼痛强度、残疾程度、心理健康、不良事件、坚持率、辍学率和工作能力。将采用第二版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具。剂量将分为累积剂量(运动训练的总分钟数和每周分钟数)和个体剂量处方变量(干预持续时间、疗程持续时间、频率和强度)。将采用基于剂量-反应模型的网络荟萃分析来评估不同运动剂量的疗效比较,以确定剂量-反应关系。证据的确定性将采用 "建议评估、制定和评价分级法 "进行评估。有关最佳运动训练剂量的信息将有助于提高治疗效果。
DOSage of Exercise for chronic low back pain disorders (DOSE): protocol for a systematic review with dose-response network meta-analysis.
Chronic low back disorders are the leading cause of direct and indirect healthcare burden globally. Exercise training improves pain intensity, mental health and physical function. However, the optimal prescription variables are unknown. We aim to compare the efficacy of various exercise dosages for chronic low back disorders to identify the optimal prescription variables. Six databases (Medline, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CENTRAL), trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) and reference lists of prior systematic reviews will be searched, and we will conduct forward and backward citation tracking. We will include peer-reviewed randomised controlled trials (individual, cluster or cross-over trials) published in English or German language comparing exercise training to other exercise training or non-exercise training interventions (conservative, non-surgical, non-pharmacological, non-invasive treatments, placebo, sham, usual/standard care, no-treatment control, waitlist control) in adults with chronic low back disorders. Outcomes will include pain intensity, disability, mental health, adverse events, adherence rate, dropout rate and work capacity. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be employed. The dose will be categorised as cumulative dose (total and weekly minutes of exercise training) and individual dose prescription variables (intervention duration, session duration, frequency and intensity). Dose-response model-based network meta-analysis will be used to assess the comparative efficacy of different exercise doses to determine a dose-response relationship. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Information about optimal exercise training dosage will help in enhancing treatment outcomes.