社会动态与话语移动:近距离观察 Twitter 推动的专业学习空间。

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000567
Binbin Zheng, Gary Beck Dallaghan, Zilu Wang
{"title":"社会动态与话语移动:近距离观察 Twitter 推动的专业学习空间。","authors":"Binbin Zheng, Gary Beck Dallaghan, Zilu Wang","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Professionals use Twitter because of its potential to support easy and rapid communication among like-minded people. It is also used widely by educators to support the establishment of professional learning spaces. This study investigates social interactions and knowledge construction in synchronous online discussions using the Twitter hashtag #MedEdChat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three synchronous Twitter discussions on #MedEdChat during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed. Social network analysis was conducted to capture the social interactions among their participants and network dynamics. Content analysis was used to examine the nature of tweets posted on #MedEdChat, including social-related, cognitive-related, and moderation-related tweets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all three discussions, a small number of individuals dominated the interactions, while also serving as hubs for connections with others in more peripheral positions. Very few participants were isolated nodes who never interacted with others during the online discussions. Our content analysis suggested that parties to these discussions posted social-related posts the most, followed by cognitive-related ones. Social posts focused on others' messages, continuing threads, issuing compliments and greetings, and expressing emotions. Cognitive-related posts, on the other hand, mostly focused on information exchange/sharing or asking content-related questions to promote discussion (ie, triggering event).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By examining social dynamics and discourse moves in Twitter-supported online synchronous discussions using the #MedEdChat hashtag, this study found that Twitter has the potential to facilitate professional learning spaces in which a few highly active individuals serve as portals for connections and interactions among all discussants. In addition, in such communities, social-related and cognitive-related tweets could promote social interactions and knowledge construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Dynamics and Discourse Moves: A Closer Look Into a Twitter-Facilitated Professional Learning Space.\",\"authors\":\"Binbin Zheng, Gary Beck Dallaghan, Zilu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Professionals use Twitter because of its potential to support easy and rapid communication among like-minded people. It is also used widely by educators to support the establishment of professional learning spaces. This study investigates social interactions and knowledge construction in synchronous online discussions using the Twitter hashtag #MedEdChat.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three synchronous Twitter discussions on #MedEdChat during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed. Social network analysis was conducted to capture the social interactions among their participants and network dynamics. Content analysis was used to examine the nature of tweets posted on #MedEdChat, including social-related, cognitive-related, and moderation-related tweets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all three discussions, a small number of individuals dominated the interactions, while also serving as hubs for connections with others in more peripheral positions. Very few participants were isolated nodes who never interacted with others during the online discussions. Our content analysis suggested that parties to these discussions posted social-related posts the most, followed by cognitive-related ones. Social posts focused on others' messages, continuing threads, issuing compliments and greetings, and expressing emotions. Cognitive-related posts, on the other hand, mostly focused on information exchange/sharing or asking content-related questions to promote discussion (ie, triggering event).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>By examining social dynamics and discourse moves in Twitter-supported online synchronous discussions using the #MedEdChat hashtag, this study found that Twitter has the potential to facilitate professional learning spaces in which a few highly active individuals serve as portals for connections and interactions among all discussants. In addition, in such communities, social-related and cognitive-related tweets could promote social interactions and knowledge construction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000567\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000567","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介专业人士使用 Twitter,是因为它可以支持志同道合者之间方便快捷的交流。教育工作者也广泛使用 Twitter 来支持专业学习空间的建立。本研究调查了使用 Twitter 标签 #MedEdChat 进行同步在线讨论时的社会互动和知识建构情况:分析了 COVID-19 大流行初期在 #MedEdChat 上进行的三次同步 Twitter 讨论。进行了社会网络分析,以捕捉参与者之间的社会互动和网络动态。内容分析用于研究在 #MedEdChat 上发布的推文的性质,包括与社会相关、与认知相关和与节制相关的推文:在所有三场讨论中,少数人主导了互动,同时也是与其他处于更边缘位置的人建立联系的枢纽。极少数参与者是孤立的节点,在在线讨论中从未与他人互动。我们的内容分析显示,这些讨论的参与者发布的帖子中,与社交相关的帖子最多,其次是与认知相关的帖子。社交帖子的重点是他人的信息、延续话题、发表赞美和问候以及表达情感。而与认知相关的帖子则主要集中在信息交流/分享或提出与内容相关的问题以促进讨论(即触发事件):通过研究使用 #MedEdChat 标签的 Twitter 支持的在线同步讨论中的社会动态和话语移动,本研究发现,Twitter 有潜力促进专业学习空间的发展,在这些空间中,少数高度活跃的个体充当了所有讨论者之间联系和互动的门户。此外,在这类社区中,与社交和认知相关的推文可以促进社交互动和知识建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Dynamics and Discourse Moves: A Closer Look Into a Twitter-Facilitated Professional Learning Space.

Introduction: Professionals use Twitter because of its potential to support easy and rapid communication among like-minded people. It is also used widely by educators to support the establishment of professional learning spaces. This study investigates social interactions and knowledge construction in synchronous online discussions using the Twitter hashtag #MedEdChat.

Methods: Three synchronous Twitter discussions on #MedEdChat during the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed. Social network analysis was conducted to capture the social interactions among their participants and network dynamics. Content analysis was used to examine the nature of tweets posted on #MedEdChat, including social-related, cognitive-related, and moderation-related tweets.

Results: In all three discussions, a small number of individuals dominated the interactions, while also serving as hubs for connections with others in more peripheral positions. Very few participants were isolated nodes who never interacted with others during the online discussions. Our content analysis suggested that parties to these discussions posted social-related posts the most, followed by cognitive-related ones. Social posts focused on others' messages, continuing threads, issuing compliments and greetings, and expressing emotions. Cognitive-related posts, on the other hand, mostly focused on information exchange/sharing or asking content-related questions to promote discussion (ie, triggering event).

Discussion: By examining social dynamics and discourse moves in Twitter-supported online synchronous discussions using the #MedEdChat hashtag, this study found that Twitter has the potential to facilitate professional learning spaces in which a few highly active individuals serve as portals for connections and interactions among all discussants. In addition, in such communities, social-related and cognitive-related tweets could promote social interactions and knowledge construction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Reviewer Acknowledgment. Applying the Purpose, Autonomy, Confidence, Engrossment Model of Motivational Design to Support Motivation for Continuing Professional Development. The Professional Agency in Supervision of General Practitioners Before Their Supervisor Training Module: A Narrative Positioning Analysis. Assessing Physician Motivation to Engage in Continuing Professional Development on Artificial Intelligence. Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1