印度尼西亚家畜布鲁氏菌病流行情况的荟萃分析。

IF 7.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945
Muhammad Rosyid Ridlo, Morsid Andityas, Roza Azizah Primatika, Handang Widantara, Shih Keng Loong, Dian Meididewi Nuraini
{"title":"印度尼西亚家畜布鲁氏菌病流行情况的荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad Rosyid Ridlo, Morsid Andityas, Roza Azizah Primatika, Handang Widantara, Shih Keng Loong, Dian Meididewi Nuraini","doi":"10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indonesia has a long history of livestock brucellosis, but the overall pooled prevalence remains unclear. This study aims to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of livestock brucellosis in Indonesia using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched and screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from included studies were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model in R 4.3.0 for pooled estimated prevalence, subgroup meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Publication bias and sensitivity tests were conducted using Egger's test, funnel plot, trim and fill plot, and leave-one-out. The screening process identified 46 included studies, representing 47,057 samples for brucellosis testing. The pooled estimated prevalence for livestock brucellosis was 3.25% (95% CI, 1.81%-5.78%) with high heterogeneity (<i>Q</i> = 2130.91, <i>p</i> = 0, <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>=98%). Subgroup meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the prevalence of livestock brucellosis across the main islands in Indonesia (<i>p</i> = 0.44) and across provinces in Sulawesi Island (<i>p</i> = 0.83), but significant differences were found among provinces in Java (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The subgroup meta-analysis based on animal type showed no significant difference between cattle, small ruminants, and pig brucellosis estimated prevalence (<i>p</i> = 0.26). Between serological tests, no significant difference was found (<i>p</i> = 0.77). Meta-regression showed no significant difference in brucellosis prevalence from 1988-2023. Egger's test and funnel plot showed publication bias. Trim and fill test indicated 21 studies should be added. As most studies were conducted in Java and Sulawesi Islands, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results, emphasizing the necessity of increasing the study of brucellosis in other regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51207,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis of livestock brucellosis prevalence in Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Rosyid Ridlo, Morsid Andityas, Roza Azizah Primatika, Handang Widantara, Shih Keng Loong, Dian Meididewi Nuraini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Indonesia has a long history of livestock brucellosis, but the overall pooled prevalence remains unclear. This study aims to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of livestock brucellosis in Indonesia using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched and screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from included studies were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model in R 4.3.0 for pooled estimated prevalence, subgroup meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Publication bias and sensitivity tests were conducted using Egger's test, funnel plot, trim and fill plot, and leave-one-out. The screening process identified 46 included studies, representing 47,057 samples for brucellosis testing. The pooled estimated prevalence for livestock brucellosis was 3.25% (95% CI, 1.81%-5.78%) with high heterogeneity (<i>Q</i> = 2130.91, <i>p</i> = 0, <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>=98%). Subgroup meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the prevalence of livestock brucellosis across the main islands in Indonesia (<i>p</i> = 0.44) and across provinces in Sulawesi Island (<i>p</i> = 0.83), but significant differences were found among provinces in Java (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The subgroup meta-analysis based on animal type showed no significant difference between cattle, small ruminants, and pig brucellosis estimated prevalence (<i>p</i> = 0.26). Between serological tests, no significant difference was found (<i>p</i> = 0.77). Meta-regression showed no significant difference in brucellosis prevalence from 1988-2023. Egger's test and funnel plot showed publication bias. Trim and fill test indicated 21 studies should be added. As most studies were conducted in Java and Sulawesi Islands, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results, emphasizing the necessity of increasing the study of brucellosis in other regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11338204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2024.2390945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度尼西亚的家畜布鲁氏菌病由来已久,但总体流行率仍不清楚。本研究旨在采用系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,确定印度尼西亚家畜布鲁氏菌病的总体估计流行率。采用预定义的纳入和排除标准对五个数据库进行了检索和筛选。使用 R 4.3.0 中的随机效应模型对纳入研究的数据进行提取和分析,以汇总估计流行率、亚组荟萃分析和荟萃回归。使用 Egger 检验、漏斗图、修剪和填充图以及 "leave-one-out "进行了发表偏倚和敏感性检验。筛选过程确定了 46 项纳入研究,代表了 47057 个布鲁氏菌病检测样本。牲畜布鲁氏菌病的总患病率估计为 3.25%(95% CI,1.81%-5.78%),异质性较高(Q = 2130.91,P = 0,I2=98%)。分组荟萃分析表明,印尼各主要岛屿(P = 0.44)和苏拉威西岛各省(P = 0.83)的家畜布鲁氏菌病流行率无显著差异,但爪哇岛各省之间存在显著差异(P = 0.26)。血清学检测之间没有发现显著差异(p = 0.77)。元回归结果表明,1988-2023 年间布鲁氏菌病流行率无明显差异。Egger 检验和漏斗图显示存在发表偏差。修剪和填充检验表明应增加 21 项研究。由于大多数研究都是在爪哇岛和苏拉威西岛进行的,因此在解释研究结果时应谨慎,并强调有必要增加对其他地区布鲁氏菌病的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analysis of livestock brucellosis prevalence in Indonesia.

Indonesia has a long history of livestock brucellosis, but the overall pooled prevalence remains unclear. This study aims to determine the pooled estimated prevalence of livestock brucellosis in Indonesia using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Five databases were searched and screened using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from included studies were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model in R 4.3.0 for pooled estimated prevalence, subgroup meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Publication bias and sensitivity tests were conducted using Egger's test, funnel plot, trim and fill plot, and leave-one-out. The screening process identified 46 included studies, representing 47,057 samples for brucellosis testing. The pooled estimated prevalence for livestock brucellosis was 3.25% (95% CI, 1.81%-5.78%) with high heterogeneity (Q = 2130.91, p = 0, I2=98%). Subgroup meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in the prevalence of livestock brucellosis across the main islands in Indonesia (p = 0.44) and across provinces in Sulawesi Island (p = 0.83), but significant differences were found among provinces in Java (p < 0.01). The subgroup meta-analysis based on animal type showed no significant difference between cattle, small ruminants, and pig brucellosis estimated prevalence (p = 0.26). Between serological tests, no significant difference was found (p = 0.77). Meta-regression showed no significant difference in brucellosis prevalence from 1988-2023. Egger's test and funnel plot showed publication bias. Trim and fill test indicated 21 studies should be added. As most studies were conducted in Java and Sulawesi Islands, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results, emphasizing the necessity of increasing the study of brucellosis in other regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Quarterly
Veterinary Quarterly VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Quarterly is an international open access journal which publishes high quality review articles and original research in the field of veterinary science and animal diseases. The journal publishes research on a range of different animal species and topics including: - Economically important species such as domesticated and non-domesticated farm animals, including avian and poultry diseases; - Companion animals (dogs, cats, horses, pocket pets and exotics); - Wildlife species; - Infectious diseases; - Diagnosis; - Treatment including pharmacology and vaccination
期刊最新文献
Investigation of the seroprevalence to equine coronavirus and SARS-CoV-2 in healthy adult horses recently imported to the United States. First detection of Omicron variant BA.4.1 lineage in dogs, Chile. Emerging zoonotic diseases in Southeast Asia in the period 2011-2022: a systematic literature review. Parasitic findings on threatened pudu deer from Central Chile accounts first genetic characterization of lice parasitizing P. puda in Chile and the first molecular report of Taenia hydatigena metacestodes in this species. Bovine anaplasmosis in Zimbabwe: spatio-temporal distribution and environmental drivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1