对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的双尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者,使用球囊扩张瓣膜或自扩张瓣膜的疗效和安全性具有可比性。

Yung-Tsai Lee, Wei-Hsian Yin, Tien-Ping Tsao, Kuo-Chen Lee, Huan-Chiu Lin, Chun-Ting Liu, Ming-Chon Hsiung, Jeng Wei
{"title":"对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术的双尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄患者,使用球囊扩张瓣膜或自扩张瓣膜的疗效和安全性具有可比性。","authors":"Yung-Tsai Lee, Wei-Hsian Yin, Tien-Ping Tsao, Kuo-Chen Lee, Huan-Chiu Lin, Chun-Ting Liu, Ming-Chon Hsiung, Jeng Wei","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate whether proper sizing can improve the procedural and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with new-generation self-expanding valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) for treating bicuspid aortic stenosis (BAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with Sapien 3 valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) or Evolut R/PRO valves (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for severe BAS from 2017 to 2022. The primary endpoints were device success rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs), including mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or disabling stroke, transcatheter heart valve failure, or clinically relevant valve thrombosis during follow-up. Our team used a complementary approach of supraannular sizing in addition to the conventional annular sizing method (Wei's method) to guide the TAVR procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited a total of 75 consecutive patients, of whom 43 (57%) were treated with BEVs from October 2017 to June 2021, and 32 (43%) were treated with SEVs from July 2021 to December 2022. Device success was similar between the BEV and SEV groups (93% vs 94%; p > 0.99), and no cases of annular rupture occurred in either group. Similar rates of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak were observed in the BEV and SEV groups (5% vs 6%, p > 0.99). At a median follow-up of 464 days, the MACCE rates were comparable between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the presence of previous percutaneous coronary interventions (hazard ratio: 5.43; p = 0.039) and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV heart failure at 30 days of follow-up after TAVR (hazard ratio: 9.90; p = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term MACCEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety for BAS patients undergoing TAVR using either BEVs or SEVs when using Wei's sizing method.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":"993-1001"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparable efficacy and safety for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves using Wei's sizing method.\",\"authors\":\"Yung-Tsai Lee, Wei-Hsian Yin, Tien-Ping Tsao, Kuo-Chen Lee, Huan-Chiu Lin, Chun-Ting Liu, Ming-Chon Hsiung, Jeng Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate whether proper sizing can improve the procedural and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with new-generation self-expanding valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) for treating bicuspid aortic stenosis (BAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with Sapien 3 valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) or Evolut R/PRO valves (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for severe BAS from 2017 to 2022. The primary endpoints were device success rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs), including mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or disabling stroke, transcatheter heart valve failure, or clinically relevant valve thrombosis during follow-up. Our team used a complementary approach of supraannular sizing in addition to the conventional annular sizing method (Wei's method) to guide the TAVR procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recruited a total of 75 consecutive patients, of whom 43 (57%) were treated with BEVs from October 2017 to June 2021, and 32 (43%) were treated with SEVs from July 2021 to December 2022. Device success was similar between the BEV and SEV groups (93% vs 94%; p > 0.99), and no cases of annular rupture occurred in either group. Similar rates of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak were observed in the BEV and SEV groups (5% vs 6%, p > 0.99). At a median follow-up of 464 days, the MACCE rates were comparable between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the presence of previous percutaneous coronary interventions (hazard ratio: 5.43; p = 0.039) and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV heart failure at 30 days of follow-up after TAVR (hazard ratio: 9.90; p = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term MACCEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety for BAS patients undergoing TAVR using either BEVs or SEVs when using Wei's sizing method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"993-1001\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨适当的尺寸是否能改善使用新一代自扩张瓣膜(SEVs)和球囊扩张瓣膜(BEVs)治疗双尖瓣主动脉瓣狭窄(BAS)的经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的手术和临床结果:我们回顾性评估了2017年至2022年连续接受TAVR的患者,这些患者因严重BAS而接受了Sapien 3瓣膜(Edwards Lifesciences,Irvine,CA)或Evolut R/PRO瓣膜(Medtronic,Minneapolis,MN)治疗。主要终点是设备成功率和主要心脑不良事件(MACCE),包括随访期间的死亡率、非致命性心肌梗死或致残性中风、经导管心脏瓣膜功能衰竭或临床相关的瓣膜血栓形成。除了传统的瓣环尺寸测量方法(魏氏方法),我们的团队还采用了瓣环上尺寸测量的补充方法来指导TAVR手术:我们共招募了 75 名连续患者,其中 43 人(57%)在 2017 年 10 月至 2021 年 6 月期间接受了 BEV 治疗,32 人(43%)在 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受了 SEV 治疗。BEV组和SEV组的装置成功率相似(93% vs. 94%; p > 0.99),两组均未发生瓣环破裂。BEV 组和 SEV 组的中重度瓣膜旁漏发生率相似(5% 对 6%,P > 0.99)。在 464 天的中位随访中,两组的 MACCE 发生率相当。在多变量分析中,既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(危险比:5.43;P = 0.039)和TAVR术后30天随访时纽约心脏协会功能分级III/IV级心衰(危险比:9.90;P = 0.037)与长期MACCEs独立相关:我们的研究结果表明,在使用魏氏尺寸法时,使用 BEV 或 SEV 进行 TAVR 的 BAS 患者的疗效和安全性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparable efficacy and safety for bicuspid aortic valve stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves using Wei's sizing method.

Background: The present study aimed to investigate whether proper sizing can improve the procedural and clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with new-generation self-expanding valves (SEVs) and balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) for treating bicuspid aortic stenosis (BAS).

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with Sapien 3 valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) or Evolut R/PRO valves (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for severe BAS from 2017 to 2022. The primary endpoints were device success rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs), including mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction or disabling stroke, transcatheter heart valve failure, or clinically relevant valve thrombosis during follow-up. Our team used a complementary approach of supraannular sizing in addition to the conventional annular sizing method (Wei's method) to guide the TAVR procedures.

Results: We recruited a total of 75 consecutive patients, of whom 43 (57%) were treated with BEVs from October 2017 to June 2021, and 32 (43%) were treated with SEVs from July 2021 to December 2022. Device success was similar between the BEV and SEV groups (93% vs 94%; p > 0.99), and no cases of annular rupture occurred in either group. Similar rates of moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak were observed in the BEV and SEV groups (5% vs 6%, p > 0.99). At a median follow-up of 464 days, the MACCE rates were comparable between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the presence of previous percutaneous coronary interventions (hazard ratio: 5.43; p = 0.039) and New York Heart Association functional class III/IV heart failure at 30 days of follow-up after TAVR (hazard ratio: 9.90; p = 0.037) were independently associated with long-term MACCEs.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety for BAS patients undergoing TAVR using either BEVs or SEVs when using Wei's sizing method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology and practice patterns of achalasia in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Real‑world therapeutic strategies and survival outcomes in advanced HER2-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Insufficient pretransplant induction therapy is associated with diffuse intrahepatic cholangiopathy in ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Two novel SNPs Rs1736952 and Rs17354984 are highly associated with uveitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Feasibility and safety of Taipei Veterans General Hospital Heavy Ion Therapy Center: The first carbon-ion irradiation facility in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1