从医学影像中提取的模拟骨质疏松脊柱骨模型中椎弓根螺钉插入的患者特异性力学分析。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.31616/asj.2024.0121
Norihiro Nishida, Hidenori Suzuki, Hanvey Tetsu, Yuki Morishita, Yogesh Kumaran, Fei Jiang, Masahiro Funaba, Kazuhiro Fujimoto, Yusuke Ichihara, Takashi Sakai, Junji Ohgi
{"title":"从医学影像中提取的模拟骨质疏松脊柱骨模型中椎弓根螺钉插入的患者特异性力学分析。","authors":"Norihiro Nishida, Hidenori Suzuki, Hanvey Tetsu, Yuki Morishita, Yogesh Kumaran, Fei Jiang, Masahiro Funaba, Kazuhiro Fujimoto, Yusuke Ichihara, Takashi Sakai, Junji Ohgi","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the mechanical characteristics of bone models created from medical images.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have affected its application in surgery. However, a notable gap exists in the analyses of how patient's dimorphism and variations in vertebral body anatomy influence the maximum insertional torque (MIT) and pullout strength (POS) of pedicle screws (PS) in osteoporotic vertebral bone models derived from medical images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male and female patients with computed tomography data were selected. Dimensions of the first thoracic (T1), fourth lumbar (L4), and fifth lumbar (L5) vertebrae were measured, and bone models consisting of the cancellous and cortical bones made from polyurethane foam were created. PS with diameters of 4.5 mm, 5.5 mm, and 6.5 mm were used. T1 PS were 25 mm long, and L4 and L5 PS were 40 mm long. The bone models were secured with cement, and the MIT was measured using a calibrated torque wrench. After MIT testing, the PS head was attached to the machine's crosshead. POS was then calculated at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The L4 and L5 were notably larger in female bone models, whereas the T1 vertebra was larger in male bone models. Consequently, the MIT and POS for L4 and L5 were higher in female bone models across all PS diameters than in male bone models. Conversely, the MIT for T1 was higher in male bone models across all PS; however, no significant differences were observed in the POS values for T1 between sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mechanical properties of the proposed bone models can vary based on the vertebral structure and size. For accurate 3D surgical and mechanical simulations in the creation of custom-made medical devices, bone models must be constructed from patientspecific medical images.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images.\",\"authors\":\"Norihiro Nishida, Hidenori Suzuki, Hanvey Tetsu, Yuki Morishita, Yogesh Kumaran, Fei Jiang, Masahiro Funaba, Kazuhiro Fujimoto, Yusuke Ichihara, Takashi Sakai, Junji Ohgi\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Biomechanical study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the mechanical characteristics of bone models created from medical images.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have affected its application in surgery. However, a notable gap exists in the analyses of how patient's dimorphism and variations in vertebral body anatomy influence the maximum insertional torque (MIT) and pullout strength (POS) of pedicle screws (PS) in osteoporotic vertebral bone models derived from medical images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Male and female patients with computed tomography data were selected. Dimensions of the first thoracic (T1), fourth lumbar (L4), and fifth lumbar (L5) vertebrae were measured, and bone models consisting of the cancellous and cortical bones made from polyurethane foam were created. PS with diameters of 4.5 mm, 5.5 mm, and 6.5 mm were used. T1 PS were 25 mm long, and L4 and L5 PS were 40 mm long. The bone models were secured with cement, and the MIT was measured using a calibrated torque wrench. After MIT testing, the PS head was attached to the machine's crosshead. POS was then calculated at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The L4 and L5 were notably larger in female bone models, whereas the T1 vertebra was larger in male bone models. Consequently, the MIT and POS for L4 and L5 were higher in female bone models across all PS diameters than in male bone models. Conversely, the MIT for T1 was higher in male bone models across all PS; however, no significant differences were observed in the POS values for T1 between sexes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mechanical properties of the proposed bone models can vary based on the vertebral structure and size. For accurate 3D surgical and mechanical simulations in the creation of custom-made medical devices, bone models must be constructed from patientspecific medical images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:目的:研究根据医学影像创建的骨骼模型的机械特性:三维(3D)打印技术的最新进展影响了其在外科手术中的应用。然而,在分析患者的畸形和椎体解剖结构的变化如何影响椎弓根螺钉(PS)的最大插入扭矩(MIT)和拔出强度(POS)方面存在明显的差距:方法:选取有计算机断层扫描数据的男性和女性患者。测量了第一胸椎(T1)、第四腰椎(L4)和第五腰椎(L5)的尺寸,并用聚氨酯泡沫制作了由松质骨和皮质骨组成的骨模型。使用的 PS 直径分别为 4.5 毫米、5.5 毫米和 6.5 毫米。T1 PS 长 25 毫米,L4 和 L5 PS 长 40 毫米。骨模型用水泥固定,并使用校准过的扭矩扳手测量 MIT。MIT 测试完成后,将 PS 头连接到机器的十字头上。然后以 5 毫米/分钟的十字头速度计算 POS,直至失效:结果:女性骨骼模型中的 L4 和 L5 椎体明显较大,而男性骨骼模型中的 T1 椎体较大。因此,在所有 PS 直径上,女性骨骼模型 L4 和 L5 的 MIT 和 POS 均高于男性骨骼模型。相反,在所有 PS 中,男性骨模型中 T1 的 MIT 值较高,但 T1 的 POS 值在性别间未观察到显著差异:结论:根据椎体结构和尺寸的不同,拟议骨骼模型的机械性能也会不同。为了在创建定制医疗设备时进行精确的三维手术和机械模拟,必须根据特定患者的医学图像构建骨骼模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images.

Study design: Biomechanical study.

Purpose: To investigate the mechanical characteristics of bone models created from medical images.

Overview of literature: Recent advancements in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have affected its application in surgery. However, a notable gap exists in the analyses of how patient's dimorphism and variations in vertebral body anatomy influence the maximum insertional torque (MIT) and pullout strength (POS) of pedicle screws (PS) in osteoporotic vertebral bone models derived from medical images.

Methods: Male and female patients with computed tomography data were selected. Dimensions of the first thoracic (T1), fourth lumbar (L4), and fifth lumbar (L5) vertebrae were measured, and bone models consisting of the cancellous and cortical bones made from polyurethane foam were created. PS with diameters of 4.5 mm, 5.5 mm, and 6.5 mm were used. T1 PS were 25 mm long, and L4 and L5 PS were 40 mm long. The bone models were secured with cement, and the MIT was measured using a calibrated torque wrench. After MIT testing, the PS head was attached to the machine's crosshead. POS was then calculated at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min until failure.

Results: The L4 and L5 were notably larger in female bone models, whereas the T1 vertebra was larger in male bone models. Consequently, the MIT and POS for L4 and L5 were higher in female bone models across all PS diameters than in male bone models. Conversely, the MIT for T1 was higher in male bone models across all PS; however, no significant differences were observed in the POS values for T1 between sexes.

Conclusions: The mechanical properties of the proposed bone models can vary based on the vertebral structure and size. For accurate 3D surgical and mechanical simulations in the creation of custom-made medical devices, bone models must be constructed from patientspecific medical images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
A novel technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion to obtain a good local lordosis angle: anterior-release posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Adjacent segment degeneration at a minimum 2-year follow-up after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: the impact of sagittal spinal proportion: a retrospective case series. Patient-specific mechanical analysis of pedicle screw insertion in simulated osteoporotic spinal bone models derived from medical images. A machine learning-based approach for individualized prediction of short-term outcomes after anterior cervical corpectomy. Exploring the atlantic part of the vertebral artery in the South Indian population and its implications in spine surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1