婚姻状况在胆囊癌中的作用:真实世界竞争风险分析。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y
Haimin Jin, Danwei Du, Yangyang Xie, Haijuan Jin, Jinfei Tong, Binbin Li, Weijian Chu
{"title":"婚姻状况在胆囊癌中的作用:真实世界竞争风险分析。","authors":"Haimin Jin, Danwei Du, Yangyang Xie, Haijuan Jin, Jinfei Tong, Binbin Li, Weijian Chu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between marital status and gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to verify the relationship between marital status and GBC and construct a prognostic nomogram to predict the impact of marital status on GBC patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GBC patients were divided into married and unmarried groups using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We employed competing risk analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The relationship between marital status and GBC was then verified, and the predicted nomogram was constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3913 GBC patients were obtained from the SEER database, and an additional 76 GBC patients from Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the external validation group. The competing risk analysis revealed a significant disparity in the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (59.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the multivariate competing hazards regression analysis identified a significant association (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31; p = 0.007) between marital status and CSD. To assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD, a comprehensive competing event nomogram was constructed using factors derived from the multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year training cohorts were 0.806, 0.785, and 0.776, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, these values were 0.798, 0.790, and 0.790, while the external validation cohort exhibited AUC values of 0.748, 0.835, and 0.883 for the corresponding time intervals. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated a commendable level of concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Marriage was a protective factor for GBC patients after taking competing risk into consideration. The proposed nomogram demonstrated exceptional predictive power.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"24 1","pages":"276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of marital status in gallbladder cancer: a real-world competing risk analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haimin Jin, Danwei Du, Yangyang Xie, Haijuan Jin, Jinfei Tong, Binbin Li, Weijian Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between marital status and gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to verify the relationship between marital status and GBC and construct a prognostic nomogram to predict the impact of marital status on GBC patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GBC patients were divided into married and unmarried groups using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We employed competing risk analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The relationship between marital status and GBC was then verified, and the predicted nomogram was constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3913 GBC patients were obtained from the SEER database, and an additional 76 GBC patients from Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the external validation group. The competing risk analysis revealed a significant disparity in the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (59.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the multivariate competing hazards regression analysis identified a significant association (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31; p = 0.007) between marital status and CSD. To assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD, a comprehensive competing event nomogram was constructed using factors derived from the multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year training cohorts were 0.806, 0.785, and 0.776, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, these values were 0.798, 0.790, and 0.790, while the external validation cohort exhibited AUC values of 0.748, 0.835, and 0.883 for the corresponding time intervals. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated a commendable level of concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CSD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Marriage was a protective factor for GBC patients after taking competing risk into consideration. The proposed nomogram demonstrated exceptional predictive power.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334324/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-024-03364-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:婚姻状况与胆囊癌(GBC)之间的关系仍不确定。本研究旨在验证婚姻状况与胆囊癌之间的关系,并构建一个预后提名图来预测婚姻状况对胆囊癌患者的影响:方法:利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中的数据,将 GBC 患者分为已婚组和未婚组。我们采用了竞争风险分析、倾向得分匹配(PSM)和卡普兰-梅耶生存分析。然后验证了婚姻状况与 GBC 之间的关系,并构建了预测提名图:从 SEER 数据库中获得了 3913 例 GBC 患者,并从杭州市中医院选取了 76 例 GBC 患者作为外部验证组。竞争风险分析显示,两组患者的癌症特异性死亡(CSD)5年累积发生率存在显著差异(59.1% vs. 65.2%,P = 0.003)。此外,多变量竞争危险回归分析发现,婚姻状况与 CSD 之间存在显著关联(HR,1.17;95% CI,1.04-1.31;p = 0.007)。为了评估 CSD 的 1 年、3 年和 5 年风险,利用多变量分析得出的因素构建了一个综合竞争事件提名图。1年、3年和5年训练队列的接收器操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值分别为0.806、0.785和0.776。内部验证队列的 AUC 值分别为 0.798、0.790 和 0.790,而外部验证队列在相应时间间隔内的 AUC 值分别为 0.748、0.835 和 0.883。此外,校准曲线显示,观察到的 CSD 概率与预测的 CSD 概率之间的吻合程度值得称赞:结论:考虑到竞争风险,婚姻是 GBC 患者的一个保护因素。所提出的提名图显示了卓越的预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of marital status in gallbladder cancer: a real-world competing risk analysis.

Background: The association between marital status and gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to verify the relationship between marital status and GBC and construct a prognostic nomogram to predict the impact of marital status on GBC patients.

Method: GBC patients were divided into married and unmarried groups using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We employed competing risk analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The relationship between marital status and GBC was then verified, and the predicted nomogram was constructed.

Results: A total of 3913 GBC patients were obtained from the SEER database, and an additional 76 GBC patients from Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the external validation group. The competing risk analysis revealed a significant disparity in the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (59.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the multivariate competing hazards regression analysis identified a significant association (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31; p = 0.007) between marital status and CSD. To assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD, a comprehensive competing event nomogram was constructed using factors derived from the multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year training cohorts were 0.806, 0.785, and 0.776, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, these values were 0.798, 0.790, and 0.790, while the external validation cohort exhibited AUC values of 0.748, 0.835, and 0.883 for the corresponding time intervals. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated a commendable level of concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CSD.

Conclusion: Marriage was a protective factor for GBC patients after taking competing risk into consideration. The proposed nomogram demonstrated exceptional predictive power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1