在手部关节痛的持续评估项目中检测系统性自身免疫疾病。与炎症性和非炎症性关节病的比较分析。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.15292
Magri Sebastian, Mareco Jonatan, Ruta Alvaro, Ruta Santiago, Salvatori Facundo, Gomez Ramiro, Garcia-Salinas Rodrigo
{"title":"在手部关节痛的持续评估项目中检测系统性自身免疫疾病。与炎症性和非炎症性关节病的比较分析。","authors":"Magri Sebastian,&nbsp;Mareco Jonatan,&nbsp;Ruta Alvaro,&nbsp;Ruta Santiago,&nbsp;Salvatori Facundo,&nbsp;Gomez Ramiro,&nbsp;Garcia-Salinas Rodrigo","doi":"10.1111/1756-185X.15292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Arthralgias are prevalent in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), emphasizing the need for early recognition. This study aimed to estimate SARD frequency and compare clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings among SARD, non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), and RA in patients with hand arthralgias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective evaluation program included individuals aged ≥18 with hand arthralgias. Baseline assessments covered clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and radiography. Follow-up diagnoses categorized patients into SARD, NIA, and RA groups. Comparison between groups was performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Two multivariate logistic regression analyzes were performed using the final diagnosis of SARD as the dependent variable (NIA and RA). ROC curves were calculated in those variables that presented an independent association in the multivariate analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 1053 patients, 9.6% were SARD (SLE 47%). Comparing SARD with NIA revealed higher CRP levels, power Doppler, less rhizarthrosis in ultrasound, and more ANA positivity in SARD patients. Distinct differences were observed between SARD and RA patients in terms of pain levels, swollen joints, metacarpophalangeal involvement and morning symptoms. Diagnostic markers demonstrated specific sensitivities and specificities: ANA for SARD versus NIA (82%, 34%), US not finding rhizarthrosis for SARD versus NIA (66%, 85%), CRP (cut-off &gt;2.5 mg/L) sensitivity 52%, specificity 60%, AUC 0.62, RA antibodies (RF, 11 IU/mL) sensitivity 76%, specificity 74%, AUC 0.8, ACPA (1.25) sensitivity 50%, specificity 98%, AUC 0.7, ANA+ sensitivity 95%, specificity 32%, AUC 0.7, and US absence of synovitis sensitivity 82%, specificity 34%, AUC 0.75.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights distinct clinical, laboratory, and imaging features differentiating SARD-related hand arthralgia from non-SARD hand arthralgia and RA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of systemic autoimmune diseases in an ongoing assessment program for hand arthralgias. A comparative analysis with inflammatory and non-inflammatory arthropathies\",\"authors\":\"Magri Sebastian,&nbsp;Mareco Jonatan,&nbsp;Ruta Alvaro,&nbsp;Ruta Santiago,&nbsp;Salvatori Facundo,&nbsp;Gomez Ramiro,&nbsp;Garcia-Salinas Rodrigo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-185X.15292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Arthralgias are prevalent in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), emphasizing the need for early recognition. This study aimed to estimate SARD frequency and compare clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings among SARD, non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), and RA in patients with hand arthralgias.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A prospective evaluation program included individuals aged ≥18 with hand arthralgias. Baseline assessments covered clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and radiography. Follow-up diagnoses categorized patients into SARD, NIA, and RA groups. Comparison between groups was performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Two multivariate logistic regression analyzes were performed using the final diagnosis of SARD as the dependent variable (NIA and RA). ROC curves were calculated in those variables that presented an independent association in the multivariate analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 1053 patients, 9.6% were SARD (SLE 47%). Comparing SARD with NIA revealed higher CRP levels, power Doppler, less rhizarthrosis in ultrasound, and more ANA positivity in SARD patients. Distinct differences were observed between SARD and RA patients in terms of pain levels, swollen joints, metacarpophalangeal involvement and morning symptoms. Diagnostic markers demonstrated specific sensitivities and specificities: ANA for SARD versus NIA (82%, 34%), US not finding rhizarthrosis for SARD versus NIA (66%, 85%), CRP (cut-off &gt;2.5 mg/L) sensitivity 52%, specificity 60%, AUC 0.62, RA antibodies (RF, 11 IU/mL) sensitivity 76%, specificity 74%, AUC 0.8, ACPA (1.25) sensitivity 50%, specificity 98%, AUC 0.7, ANA+ sensitivity 95%, specificity 32%, AUC 0.7, and US absence of synovitis sensitivity 82%, specificity 34%, AUC 0.75.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study highlights distinct clinical, laboratory, and imaging features differentiating SARD-related hand arthralgia from non-SARD hand arthralgia and RA.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.15292\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.15292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:关节痛在全身性自身免疫性风湿病(SARD)中很常见,因此需要及早识别。本研究旨在估算SARD的发病频率,并比较手关节痛患者中SARD、非炎症性关节痛(NIA)和RA的临床、实验室和影像学结果:一项前瞻性评估项目纳入了年龄≥18 岁的手关节痛患者。基线评估包括临床、实验室、超声波和放射学检查。随访诊断将患者分为SARD组、NIA组和RA组。组间比较采用参数和非参数检验。以 SARD 的最终诊断为因变量(NIA 和 RA),进行了两次多变量逻辑回归分析。对在多变量分析中呈现独立关联的变量计算了ROC曲线:在1053名患者中,9.6%为SARD(系统性红斑狼疮占47%)。将 SARD 与 NIA 进行比较后发现,SARD 患者的 CRP 水平较高,多普勒功率较大,超声波检查中根状关节较少,ANA 阳性率较高。在疼痛程度、关节肿胀、掌指关节受累和晨间症状方面,SARD 和 RA 患者之间存在明显差异。诊断标记物显示出特定的敏感性和特异性:SARD与NIA相比,ANA的敏感性分别为82%和34%;SARD与NIA相比,US检查未发现根关节炎的敏感性分别为66%和85%;CRP(临界值>2.5 mg/L)的敏感性为52%,特异性为60%,AUC为0.62;RA抗体(RF,11 IU/mL)的敏感性为76%,特异性为74%,AUC为0.8;ACPA(1.25)灵敏度为 50%,特异性为 98%,AUC 为 0.7;ANA+ 灵敏度为 95%,特异性为 32%,AUC 为 0.7;US 无滑膜炎灵敏度为 82%,特异性为 34%,AUC 为 0.75:本研究强调了将 SARD 相关手关节痛与非 SARD 手关节痛和 RA 区分开来的独特临床、实验室和影像学特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of systemic autoimmune diseases in an ongoing assessment program for hand arthralgias. A comparative analysis with inflammatory and non-inflammatory arthropathies

Introduction

Arthralgias are prevalent in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), emphasizing the need for early recognition. This study aimed to estimate SARD frequency and compare clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings among SARD, non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), and RA in patients with hand arthralgias.

Methods

A prospective evaluation program included individuals aged ≥18 with hand arthralgias. Baseline assessments covered clinical, laboratory, ultrasound, and radiography. Follow-up diagnoses categorized patients into SARD, NIA, and RA groups. Comparison between groups was performed using parametric and non-parametric tests. Two multivariate logistic regression analyzes were performed using the final diagnosis of SARD as the dependent variable (NIA and RA). ROC curves were calculated in those variables that presented an independent association in the multivariate analysis.

Results

Among 1053 patients, 9.6% were SARD (SLE 47%). Comparing SARD with NIA revealed higher CRP levels, power Doppler, less rhizarthrosis in ultrasound, and more ANA positivity in SARD patients. Distinct differences were observed between SARD and RA patients in terms of pain levels, swollen joints, metacarpophalangeal involvement and morning symptoms. Diagnostic markers demonstrated specific sensitivities and specificities: ANA for SARD versus NIA (82%, 34%), US not finding rhizarthrosis for SARD versus NIA (66%, 85%), CRP (cut-off >2.5 mg/L) sensitivity 52%, specificity 60%, AUC 0.62, RA antibodies (RF, 11 IU/mL) sensitivity 76%, specificity 74%, AUC 0.8, ACPA (1.25) sensitivity 50%, specificity 98%, AUC 0.7, ANA+ sensitivity 95%, specificity 32%, AUC 0.7, and US absence of synovitis sensitivity 82%, specificity 34%, AUC 0.75.

Conclusion

This study highlights distinct clinical, laboratory, and imaging features differentiating SARD-related hand arthralgia from non-SARD hand arthralgia and RA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Adamantiades-Behcet's disease: From the first known descriptions to the era of the biologic agents. Case report: Immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis mimicking rheumatoid arthritis. Chronic kidney disease in patients with lupus nephritis-Important but underrecognized. Comparative outcome of patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease affected by COVID-19 infection-An Asian perspective. Concurrent breast cancer and IgG4-related orbital pseudotumor in a man.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1