单一益生菌和复合益生菌对生长育肥猪和猪堆肥的影响。

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Animal Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI:10.5187/jast.2024.e88
Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho
{"title":"单一益生菌和复合益生菌对生长育肥猪和猪堆肥的影响。","authors":"Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho","doi":"10.5187/jast.2024.e88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 3) T2, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 4) T3, spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 5) T4: spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 6) T5, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 5 g + <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 5 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 7) T6, spray <i>Saccharomyces subtilis</i> 20 g + <i>S. cerevisiae</i> 20 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup> and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of single and complex probiotics in growing-finishing pigs and swine compost.\",\"authors\":\"Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5187/jast.2024.e88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 3) T2, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 4) T3, spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 5) T4: spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 6) T5, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 5 g + <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 5 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 7) T6, spray <i>Saccharomyces subtilis</i> 20 g + <i>S. cerevisiae</i> 20 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup> and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e88\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e88","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究补充了单一益生菌和复合益生菌,以调查其对生长育肥猪和堆肥的影响。在实验 1 中,64 头初始体重为 18.75 ± 0.33 千克、出生天数为 63 天的杂交猪([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc)根据初始体重被分配到完全随机的 4 个处理组(每组 4 头猪,每个处理组 4 个重复栏)。在 13 周的时间里,猪只接受了以下日粮处理:1)对照组(CON;基础日粮);2)T1(CON + 0.2%枯草芽孢杆菌);3)T2(CON + 0.2%酵母菌);4)T3(CON + 0.2%枯草芽孢杆菌 + 0.2%酵母菌)。实验 2 的猪粪来自忠北国立大学(韩国清州)猪场。在为期 12 周的实验中,对猪粪进行了以下补充处理1) CON,不添加堆肥;2) T1,每 3.306 平方米喷施枯草芽孢杆菌 10 克;3) T2,每 3.306 平方米喷施枯草芽孢杆菌 40 克;4) T3,每 3.306 平方米喷施酵母菌 10 克;5) T4:每 3.306 平方米喷施酵母菌 40 克;6) T5:每 3.306 平方米喷施酵母菌 10 克;7) T6:每 3.306 平方米喷施酵母菌 40 克。306平方米;6)T5,每3.306平方米喷施枯草芽孢杆菌5克+酵母菌5克;7)T6,每3.306平方米喷施枯草芽孢杆菌20克+酵母菌20克,每个处理设6个重复。在试验 1 中,在整个试验期间,与其他组相比,T3 组的饲料转化率和平均日增重均有显著提高(p < 0.05)。在平均成熟度方面,T3 组明显高于其他组(P < 0.05)。与未添加复合益生菌组相比,添加复合益生菌组的 H2S 排放量和粪便微生物菌群得到改善(p < 0.05)。在实验 2 中,添加益生菌组与未添加益生菌组相比,在 9 周和 12 周时对水分含量没有影响(p > 0.05)。与其他组相比,T6 组在所有时期的平均成熟度评分以及 1 周和 4 周的氨气排放量都有明显改善(p < 0.05)。总之,补充复合益生菌对猪和堆肥都有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of single and complex probiotics in growing-finishing pigs and swine compost.

This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% Bacillus subtilis), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% Saccharomyces cerevisiae), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% Bacillus subtilis + 0.2% Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray Bacillus subtilis 10 g per 3.306 m2; 3) T2, spray Bacillus subtilis 40 g per 3.306 m2; 4) T3, spray Saccharomyces cerevisiae 10 g per 3.306 m2; 5) T4: spray Saccharomyces cerevisiae 40 g per 3.306 m2; 6) T5, spray Bacillus subtilis 5 g + Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5 g per 3.306 m2; 7) T6, spray Saccharomyces subtilis 20 g + S. cerevisiae 20 g per 3.306 m2 and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (p < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (p < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (p > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (p < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
Journal of Animal Science and Technology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science. Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare. Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication. The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).
期刊最新文献
Comparison various level ascorbic acid and lycopene additions in semen diluent enhanced sperm quality of Sapudi ram. Comparative study on the bioavailability of peptide extracts from Jeju black pigs and three-way crossbred pigs. Complete genome sequence of Treponema pedis GNW45 isolated from dairy cattle with active bovine digital dermatitis in Korea. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-adipogenesis activities and proximate composition of Hermetia illucens larvae reared on food waste enriched with different wastes. Exploring the multifaceted factors affecting pork meat quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1