Cumhur Deniz Davulcu, Sertac Saruhan, Emre Bilgin, Eyup Cagatay Zengin
{"title":"在交换钉治疗股骨干不连接的过程中,植骨对骨结合的影响。","authors":"Cumhur Deniz Davulcu, Sertac Saruhan, Emre Bilgin, Eyup Cagatay Zengin","doi":"10.14744/nci.2023.43410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effect of bone grafting on the bone union in exchange nailing (EN) for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 26 patients (16 male) were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 36.1±9.3. Bone grafts were used in 8 patients (bone graft group), and EN was performed without bone grafting (no bone graft group) in 18 patients. Etiology, fracture type, location, and classification of the fractures at the time of initial injury were evaluated. The reduction type (open or closed) and locking status of the nails were also noted. Nonunion types were recorded. In the bone grafting group, iliac bone autografts were used in seven patients and a synthetic bone graft was used in one patient. Following EN, the presence and duration of bone union, and the increase in the nails' diameter were analyzed for each group and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Union rates were 100% and 94.4% in bone grafting and no bone grafting groups, respectively. The mean union period was not significant between the groups (22.5 and 16.5 months, respectively). The mean increase in the nail diameter was 1.88 mm in the bone graft group and 2.00 mm in the no bone graft group (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that high union rates can be achieved with EN by means of using larger diameter nails with or without bone grafting in the management of femoral shaft nonunions, and bone grafting had no significant effect on union rates and periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94347,"journal":{"name":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","volume":"11 4","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of bone grafting on bone union in exchange nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.\",\"authors\":\"Cumhur Deniz Davulcu, Sertac Saruhan, Emre Bilgin, Eyup Cagatay Zengin\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/nci.2023.43410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effect of bone grafting on the bone union in exchange nailing (EN) for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 26 patients (16 male) were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 36.1±9.3. Bone grafts were used in 8 patients (bone graft group), and EN was performed without bone grafting (no bone graft group) in 18 patients. Etiology, fracture type, location, and classification of the fractures at the time of initial injury were evaluated. The reduction type (open or closed) and locking status of the nails were also noted. Nonunion types were recorded. In the bone grafting group, iliac bone autografts were used in seven patients and a synthetic bone graft was used in one patient. Following EN, the presence and duration of bone union, and the increase in the nails' diameter were analyzed for each group and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Union rates were 100% and 94.4% in bone grafting and no bone grafting groups, respectively. The mean union period was not significant between the groups (22.5 and 16.5 months, respectively). The mean increase in the nail diameter was 1.88 mm in the bone graft group and 2.00 mm in the no bone graft group (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that high union rates can be achieved with EN by means of using larger diameter nails with or without bone grafting in the management of femoral shaft nonunions, and bone grafting had no significant effect on union rates and periods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Northern clinics of Istanbul\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"322-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Northern clinics of Istanbul\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.43410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northern clinics of Istanbul","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/nci.2023.43410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of bone grafting on bone union in exchange nailing for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
Objective: This study aims to investigate the effect of bone grafting on the bone union in exchange nailing (EN) for the treatment of femoral shaft nonunions.
Methods: A total of 26 patients (16 male) were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 36.1±9.3. Bone grafts were used in 8 patients (bone graft group), and EN was performed without bone grafting (no bone graft group) in 18 patients. Etiology, fracture type, location, and classification of the fractures at the time of initial injury were evaluated. The reduction type (open or closed) and locking status of the nails were also noted. Nonunion types were recorded. In the bone grafting group, iliac bone autografts were used in seven patients and a synthetic bone graft was used in one patient. Following EN, the presence and duration of bone union, and the increase in the nails' diameter were analyzed for each group and compared.
Results: Union rates were 100% and 94.4% in bone grafting and no bone grafting groups, respectively. The mean union period was not significant between the groups (22.5 and 16.5 months, respectively). The mean increase in the nail diameter was 1.88 mm in the bone graft group and 2.00 mm in the no bone graft group (p>0.05).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that high union rates can be achieved with EN by means of using larger diameter nails with or without bone grafting in the management of femoral shaft nonunions, and bone grafting had no significant effect on union rates and periods.