COVID-19 大流行对利比亚冲突和卫生系统相关暴力事件的影响:间断时间序列分析

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Policy Open Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100126
Tracy Kuo Lin , Kalin Werner , Mariam M. Hamza , Christopher H. Herbst
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行对利比亚冲突和卫生系统相关暴力事件的影响:间断时间序列分析","authors":"Tracy Kuo Lin ,&nbsp;Kalin Werner ,&nbsp;Mariam M. Hamza ,&nbsp;Christopher H. Herbst","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution S/RES2532 (2020), requesting the cessation of hostilities. Despite ceasefire initiatives, evidence suggests that both conflict and violent events remained unabated—and, in some cases, escalated during the first months of the pandemic. This study uses interrupted time series analyses to examine the impact of the pandemic on violent and non-violent political events—including health system-related violence—in Libya, which has been experiencing a protracted conflict since 2014. We find a reduction of approximately 21 battles (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) only during the first month of the pandemic. However, overall, throughout the pandemic, there was an increase of roughly one battle per month (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The violence that affected healthcare workers decreased during the first year of the pandemic (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001); but by the second year the reduction in healthcare worker–related violence had dissipated. While the pandemic seems to have mitigated the level of violence experience by healthcare workers, the overall pattern of violence is a troubling one, particularly since they were observed while there is an international agreement for a ceasefire in place and a specific peace agreement occurring in Libya. The pattern suggests that policy to protect healthcare workers may need to be enhanced even more during crisis settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962400011X/pdfft?md5=5fc25f12eec83da1ece2b29aeddabb38&pid=1-s2.0-S259022962400011X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on conflict and health system–related violent events in Libya: An interrupted time series analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Kuo Lin ,&nbsp;Kalin Werner ,&nbsp;Mariam M. Hamza ,&nbsp;Christopher H. Herbst\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hpopen.2024.100126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution S/RES2532 (2020), requesting the cessation of hostilities. Despite ceasefire initiatives, evidence suggests that both conflict and violent events remained unabated—and, in some cases, escalated during the first months of the pandemic. This study uses interrupted time series analyses to examine the impact of the pandemic on violent and non-violent political events—including health system-related violence—in Libya, which has been experiencing a protracted conflict since 2014. We find a reduction of approximately 21 battles (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) only during the first month of the pandemic. However, overall, throughout the pandemic, there was an increase of roughly one battle per month (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The violence that affected healthcare workers decreased during the first year of the pandemic (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001); but by the second year the reduction in healthcare worker–related violence had dissipated. While the pandemic seems to have mitigated the level of violence experience by healthcare workers, the overall pattern of violence is a troubling one, particularly since they were observed while there is an international agreement for a ceasefire in place and a specific peace agreement occurring in Libya. The pattern suggests that policy to protect healthcare workers may need to be enhanced even more during crisis settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962400011X/pdfft?md5=5fc25f12eec83da1ece2b29aeddabb38&pid=1-s2.0-S259022962400011X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962400011X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259022962400011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为应对 COVID-19 大流行,联合国安理会通过了 S/RES2532(2020)号决议,要求停止敌对行动。尽管采取了停火举措,但有证据表明,冲突和暴力事件仍然有增无减,在某些情况下,疫情在疫情爆发的头几个月还出现了升级。利比亚自 2014 年以来一直经历着旷日持久的冲突,本研究采用间断时间序列分析法,考察了疫情对利比亚暴力和非暴力政治事件(包括与卫生系统相关的暴力事件)的影响。我们发现,仅在大流行的第一个月,暴力事件就减少了约 21 起(p < 0.001)。然而,总体而言,在整个大流行期间,每月大约增加了一场战斗(p < 0.001)。在大流行的第一年,影响医护人员的暴力事件有所减少(p <0.001);但到了第二年,与医护人员相关的暴力事件减少的趋势已经消失。虽然大流行病似乎减轻了医护人员遭受暴力的程度,但暴力的总体模式令人担忧,尤其是在国际停火协议和利比亚具体的和平协议正在实施的情况下。这种模式表明,在危机环境下,可能需要进一步加强保护医护人员的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on conflict and health system–related violent events in Libya: An interrupted time series analysis

As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution S/RES2532 (2020), requesting the cessation of hostilities. Despite ceasefire initiatives, evidence suggests that both conflict and violent events remained unabated—and, in some cases, escalated during the first months of the pandemic. This study uses interrupted time series analyses to examine the impact of the pandemic on violent and non-violent political events—including health system-related violence—in Libya, which has been experiencing a protracted conflict since 2014. We find a reduction of approximately 21 battles (p < 0.001) only during the first month of the pandemic. However, overall, throughout the pandemic, there was an increase of roughly one battle per month (p < 0.001). The violence that affected healthcare workers decreased during the first year of the pandemic (p < 0.001); but by the second year the reduction in healthcare worker–related violence had dissipated. While the pandemic seems to have mitigated the level of violence experience by healthcare workers, the overall pattern of violence is a troubling one, particularly since they were observed while there is an international agreement for a ceasefire in place and a specific peace agreement occurring in Libya. The pattern suggests that policy to protect healthcare workers may need to be enhanced even more during crisis settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Closing the equity gap: A call for policy and programmatic reforms to ensure inclusive and effective HIV prevention, treatment and care for persons with disabilities in Eastern and Southern Africa Patient’s willingness to pay for improved community health insurance in Tanzania Improving antibiotic prescribing – Recommendations for funding and pricing policies to enhance use of point-of-care tests From theory to practice: Harmonizing taxonomies of trustworthy AI How firearm legislation impacts firearm mortality internationally: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1